Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of sinus floor elevation using the lateral window technique versus the hydrodynamic transalveolar approach: a preliminary randomized controlled trial
d‐BRU - Dental Biomaterials Research Unit - ULiège [BE]
Disciplines :
Dentistry & oral medicine
Author, co-author :
BACEVIC, Miljana ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de dentisterie > Service parodontologie, chir. bucco-dentaire et implantaire
Compeyron, Yoann
LECLOUX, Geoffrey ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de dentisterie > Service parodontologie, chir. bucco-dentaire et implantaire
Rompen, Eric ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences dentaires > Chirurgie bucco-dentaire et parodontologie
LAMBERT, France ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de dentisterie > Service parodontologie, chir. bucco-dentaire et implantaire
Language :
English
Title :
Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of sinus floor elevation using the lateral window technique versus the hydrodynamic transalveolar approach: a preliminary randomized controlled trial
Barone A, Covani U (2019) Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(10):2039–2046 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0278239107006143 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.017
Lambert F, Lecloux G, Rompen E (2010) One-step approach for implant placement and subantral bone regeneration using bovine hydroxyapatite: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(3):598–606
Sharma A, Rahul GR (2012) Zygomatic implants/fixture: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol 39(2):215–224 https://www.joionline.org/doi/full/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00055 DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00055
Starch-Jensen T, Jensen JD (2019) Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of selected treatment modalities. J Oral Maxillofac Res 8(3) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676313/
Fan T, Li Y, Deng W-W, Wu T, Zhang W (2017) Short implants (5 to 8 mm) versus longer implants (>8 mm) with sinus lifting in atrophic posterior maxilla: a meta-analysis of RCTs: short implants (5 to 8 mm) versus longer implants (>8 mm). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 19(1):207–215 http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cid.12432 DOI: 10.1111/cid.12432
Boyne PJ, James RA (1980) Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 38(8):613–616
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2008) A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 35(8 Suppl):216–240 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
Summers RB (1994) A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compend Newtown Pa 15(2):152 154–6, 158 passim; quiz 162
Fugazzotto PA (2001) The modified trephine/osteotome sinus augmentation technique: technical considerations and discussion of indications. Implant Dent 10(4):259–264 DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200110000-00009
Chen L, Cha J (2005) An 8-year retrospective study: 1,100 patients receiving 1,557 implants using the minimally invasive hydraulic sinus condensing technique. J Periodontol 76(3):482–491 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.482 DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.482
Sforza NM, Marzadori M, Zucchelli G (2008) Simplified osteotome sinus augmentation technique with simultaneous implant placement: a clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 28(3):291–299
Lindhe J, Lang NP, Berglundh T, Giannobile WV, Sanz M (eds) (2015) Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry, 6th edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, Chichester, West Sussex; Ames, Iowa
Pal US, Sharma NK, Singh RK, Mahammad S, Mehrotra D, Singh N et al (2012) Direct vs. indirect sinus lift procedure: a comparison. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 3(1):31–37 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513806/ DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.102148
Troedhan A, Schlichting I, Kurrek A, Wainwright M (2014) Primary implant stability in augmented sinuslift-sites after completed bone regeneration: a randomized controlled clinical study comparing four subantrally inserted biomaterials. Sci Rep 4:5877 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep05877 DOI: 10.1038/srep05877
Stelzle F, Benner K-U (2011) Evaluation of different methods of indirect sinus floor elevation for elevation heights of 10mm: an experimental ex vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 13(2):124–133 DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00190.x
Troedhan A, Kurrek A, Wainwright M (2012) Biological principles and physiology of bone regeneration under the Schneiderian membrane after sinus lift surgery: a radiological study in 14 patients treated with the transcrestal hydrodynamic ultrasonic cavitational sinus lift (intralift). Int J Dent 576238:2012 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3382962/
Troedhan A, Kurrek A, Wainwright M, Schlichting I, Fischak-Treitl B, Ladentrog M (2013) The transcrestal hydrodynamic ultrasonic cavitational sinuslift: results of a 2-year prospective multicentre study on 404 patients, 446 sinuslift sites and 637 inserted implants. Open J Stomatol 03:471 http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=41113&#abstract DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2013.39078
Temmerman A, Dessel JV, Cortellini S, Jacobs R, Teughels W, Quirynen M (2017) Volumetric changes of grafted volumes and the Schneiderian membrane after transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation procedures: a clinical, pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 44(6):660–671 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcpe.12728 DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12728
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ et al (2010) CONSORT 2010 Explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63(8):e1–e37 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0895435610001034
Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E (2004) The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 75(4):511–516 DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511
Shlomi B, Horowitz I, Kahn A, Dobriyan A, Chaushu G (2004) The effect of sinus membrane perforation and repair with Lambone on the outcome of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19(4):559–562
Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C (2008) Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(1):91–98 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01372.x
Khoury F (1999) Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(4):557–564
Stricker A, Voss PJ, Gutwald R, Schramm A, Schmelzeisen R (2003) Maxillary sinus floor augmention with autogenous bone grafts to enable placement of SLA-surfaced implants: preliminary results after 15–40 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 14(2):207–212 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140211.x DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140211.x
Reiser GM, Rabinovitz Z, Bruno J, Damoulis PD, Griffin TJ (2001) Evaluation of maxillary sinus membrane response following elevation with the crestal osteotome technique in human cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16(6):833–840
Ardekian L, Oved-Peleg E, Mactei EE, Peled M (2006) The clinical significance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(2):277–282 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.031
Viña-Almunia J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2009) Influence of perforation of the sinus membrane on the survival rate of implants placed after direct sinus lift. Literature update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 14(3):E133–E136
Aimetti M, Romagnoli R, Ricci G, Massei G (2001) Maxillary sinus elevation: the effect of macrolacerations and microlacerations of the sinus membrane as determined by endoscopy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 21(6):581–589
Pikos MA (1999) Maxillary sinus membrane repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent 8(1):29–34 DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199901000-00003
Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C (2008) Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 19:91–98 http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01372.x
Testori T, Weinstein RL, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M (2012) Risk factor analysis following maxillary sinus augmentation: a retrospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27(5):1170–1176
Velázquez-Cayón R, Romero-Ruiz MM, Torres-Lagares D, Pérez-Dorao B, Wainwright M, Abalos-Labruzzi C et al (2012) Hydrodynamic ultrasonic maxillary sinus lift: review of a new technique and presentation of a clinical case. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 17(2):e271–e275 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448305/ DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17430
Afrashtehfar KI, Katsoulis J, Koka S, Igarashi K (2020) Single versus splinted short implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg:S2468–S7855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.08.013
Younes F, Eghbali A, Goemaere T, De Bruyckere T, Cosyn J (2018) Patient-reported outcomes after lateral wall sinus floor elevation: a systematic review. Implant Dent 27(2):236–245 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29319545/ DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000717
