Article (Scientific journals)
What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates
Mottram, R.; Hansen, N.; Kittel, Christoph et al.
2021In The Cryosphere, 15, p. 3751–3784
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
tc-15-3751-2021.pdf
Publisher postprint (8.74 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] We compare the performance of five different regional climate models (RCMs) (COSMO-CLM2, HIRHAM5, MAR3.10, MetUM, and RACMO2.3p2), forced by ERA-Interim reanalysis, in simulating the near-surface climate and surface mass balance (SMB) of Antarctica. All models simulate Antarctic climate well when compared with daily observed temperature and pressure, with nudged models matching daily observations slightly better than free-running models. The ensemble mean annual SMB over the Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) including ice shelves is 2329±94 Gt yr−1 over the common 1987–2015 period covered by all models. There is large interannual variability, consistent between models due to variability in the driving ERA-Interim reanalysis. Mean annual SMB is sensitive to the chosen period; over our 30-year climatological mean period (1980 to 2010), the ensemble mean is 2483 Gt yr−1. However, individual model estimates vary from 1961±70 to 2519±118 Gt yr−1. The largest spatial differences between model SMB estimates are in West Antarctica, the Antarctic Peninsula, and around the Transantarctic Mountains. We find no significant trend in Antarctic SMB over either period. Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) mass loss is currently equivalent to around 0.5 mm yr−1 of global mean sea level rise (Shepherd et al., 2020), but our results indicate some uncertainty in the SMB contribution based on RCMs. We compare modelled SMB with a large dataset of observations, which, though biased by undersampling, indicates that many of the biases in SMB are common between models. A drifting-snow scheme improves modelled SMB on ice sheet surface slopes with an elevation between 1000 and 2000 m, where strong katabatic winds form. Different ice masks have a substantial impact on the integrated total SMB and along with model resolution are factored into our analysis. Targeting undersampled regions with high precipitation for observational campaigns will be key to improving future estimates of SMB in Antarctica.
Research center :
Sphères - SPHERES
Disciplines :
Earth sciences & physical geography
Author, co-author :
Mottram, R.
Hansen, N.
Kittel, Christoph  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Climatologie et Topoclimatologie
van Wessem, M.
Agosta, C.
Amory, Charles 
Boberg, F.
van de Berg, W.J.
Fettweis, Xavier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Climatologie et Topoclimatologie
Gossart, A.
van Lipzig, N.
van Meijgaard, E.
Orr, A.
Phillips, T.
Webster, S.
Simonsen, S.
Souverijns, N.
More authors (7 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
What is the surface mass balance of Antarctica? An intercomparison of regional climate model estimates
Publication date :
17 August 2021
Journal title :
The Cryosphere
ISSN :
1994-0416
eISSN :
1994-0424
Publisher :
Copernicus, Katlenberg-Lindau, Germany
Volume :
15
Pages :
3751–3784
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Tags :
CÉCI : Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]
CÉCI - Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif [BE]
Available on ORBi :
since 20 August 2021

Statistics


Number of views
63 (5 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
40 (4 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
57
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
34
OpenCitations
 
25

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi