Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia

Authelet, Manon; Subervie, J.; Meyfroidt, P.; Asquith, N.; Ezzine-de-Blas, D.

doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487

Article (Scientific journals)

Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia

Authelet, Manon; Subervie, J.; Meyfroidt, P. et al.

2021 • In World Development: the Multi-Disciplinary International Journal Devoted to the Study and Promotion of World Development, 145 (Septembre), p. 105487

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/261080

DOI
10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Economic-prosocial-proenvironmental-factors-BoliviaWorld-Development.pdf

Publisher postprint (4.19 MB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Bolivia; Forest conservation; Incentive-based conservation program; Motivations; Participation; South America

Abstract :

[en] The effectiveness of incentive-based conservation programs depends on how they influence and interact with multiple motivations of the participants. Here, we studied an incentive-based program for forest conservation in Bolivia – called “Reciprocal Watershared Agreements” – that mixes material compensations with pro-social and pro-environmental motivations as a way to reduce crowding-out of intrinsic motivations and to increase participation. Based on a sample of 470 households who were offered the program, we studied household characteristics that influenced (i) the probability of participation in the program, (ii) the intensity of the participation, measured as the area allocated in the agreement, and (iii) the modality of participation, measured as the probability of participation in the different types of agreements. We found that owning property titles, having large forested land with low conservation opportunity cost, agricultural equipment and off-farm incomes seem to favour participation. In addition, the probability of participation increases with some pro-social factors, such as a deeper or older integration into social networks, and greater compliance to social norms of reciprocity. We also found that a lack of trust in public institutions can increase both the likelihood and the intensity of participation, as can certain pro-environmental factors, such as awareness of environmental problems, knowledge about potential solutions to solve them and perception of the gains associated with the conservation of ecosystem services. Finally, we found that feeling some individual responsibility for environmental issues and some difficulty in performing pro-environmental options may increase participation into more restrictive agreements. Our results thus highlight the factors that could increase uptake and factors on which programs might focus in order to have a greater impact on pro-environmental behaviours. They also suggest that incentive-based program can be designed to take advantage of pro-social and pro-environmental motivations as strongly as of economic ones. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd

Disciplines :

Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...)

Author, co-author :

Authelet, Manon ; Université de Liège - ULiège

Subervie, J.; CEE-M. Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France

Meyfroidt, P.; Earth and Life Institute (ELI), UCLouvain, Belgium and XX. F.R.S.-FNRS, Belgium

Asquith, N.; Cuencas SustentablesBolivia, Bolivia, Harvard Forest and Sustainability Science Program, Kennedy School of Government (KSG), Harvard University

Ezzine-de-Blas, D.; Internal Research Unit on Forests and Societies (UPR F&S), French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Montpellier University, Montpellier, France

Language :

English

Title :

Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia

Publication date :

2021

Journal title :

World Development: the Multi-Disciplinary International Journal Devoted to the Study and Promotion of World Development

ISSN :

0305-750X

Publisher :

Elsevier, United Kingdom

Volume :

145

Issue :

Septembre

Pages :

105487

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]

Available on ORBi :

since 17 June 2021

Statistics

Number of views

46 (8 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Angelsen, A., Wunder, S., Exploring the forest—poverty link. CIFOR occasional paper, 2003, 1–20.
Arriagada, R.A., Sills, E.O., Pattanayak, S.K., Ferraro, P.J., Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica's program of payments for environmental services. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28:3-5 (2009), 343–367.
Armitage, Christopher, Conner, Mark, Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology, 2001, 10.1348/014466601164939.
Asquith, N. (2016). Watershared: adaptation, mitigation, watershed protection and economic development in Latin America. Inside stories on climate compatible development.
Balthazar, V., Vanacker, V., Molina, A., Lambin, E.F., Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains. Ecological indicators 48 (2015), 63–75.
Bamberg, S., Möser, G., Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27:1 (2007), 14–25.
Bandura, A., Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 37:2 (1982), 122–147.
Bandura, A., Locke, E.A., Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 88:1 (2003), 87–99.
Bathurst, J.C., Amezaga, J., Cisneros, F., Gaviño Novillo, M., Iroumé, A., Lenzi, M.A., Urciuolo, A., Forests and floods in Latin America: Science, management, policy and the EPIC FORCE project: In memoriam: Ian Rainy Calder (1945–2009). Water International 35:2 (2010), 114–131.
Beierle, T.C., Cayford, J., Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. 2002, RFF Press, Washington, DC.
Benabou, R., Tirole, J., Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies 70:3 (2003), 489–520.
Bonnesoeur, V., Locatelli, B., Guariguata, M.R., Ochoa-Tocachi, B.F., Vanacker, V., Mao, Z., Mathez-Stiefel, S.-L., Impacts of forests and forestation on hydrological services in the Andes: A systematic review. Forest Ecology and Management 433 (2019), 569–584.
Börner, J., Baylis, K., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey-Rosés, J., Persson, U.M., Wunder, S., The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Development 96 (2017), 359–374.
Bottazzi, P., Wiik, E., Crespo, D., Jones, J.P.G., Payment for environmental “self-service”: Exploring the Links between farmers' motivation and additionality in a conservation incentive programme in the Bolivian Andes. Ecological Economics 150 (2018), 11–23.
Bourdieu, P., The forms of capital. Richardson, J.G., (eds.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 1986, Greenwood Press, New York, 241–258.
Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal 112:483 (2002), F419–F436.
Bowles, S., Polanía-Reyes, S., Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements?. Journal of Economic Literature 50:2 (2012), 368–425.
Bremer, L.L., Farley, K.A., Lopez-Carr, D., What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program. Land Use Policy 36 (2014), 122–133.
Cavendish, W., How do forests support, insure and improve the livelihoods of the rural poor?. 2003, A research note. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
Célleri, R., Feyen, J., The hydrology of tropical Andean ecosystems: Importance, knowledge status, and perspectives. Mountain Research and Development 29:4 (2009), 350–355.
Chen, X., Lupi, F., An, L.i., Sheely, R., Viña, A., Liu, J., Agent-based modeling of the effects of social norms on enrollment in payments for ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling 229 (2012), 16–24.
Clayton, S., Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature, 2003, 45–65.
Clayton, S., Opotow, S., Introduction: Identity and the natural environment, 2003, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1–24.
Cramb, R.A., Social capital and soil conservation: Evidence from the Philippines. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 49:2 (2005), 211–226.
Cranford, M., Mourato, S., Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 71 (2011), 89–98.
Crilly, D., Schneider, S.C., Zollo, M., Psychological antecedents to socially responsible behaviour. European Management Review 5:3 (2008), 175–190.
De Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E., Progress in the modeling of rural households’ behaviour under market failures. Poverty, inequality and development, 2006, Springer, Boston, MA, 155–181.
Ellison, D., Morris, C.E., Locatelli, B., Sheil, D., Cohen, J., Murdiyarso, D., Sullivan, C.A., Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world. Global Environmental Change 43 (2017), 51–61.
Engel, S., Palmer, C., Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: The case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics 65:4 (2008), 799–809.
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Corbera, E., Lapeyre, R., Payments for environmental services and motivation crowding: Towards a conceptual framework. Ecological Economics 156 (2019), 434–443.
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Wunder, S., Ruiz-Pérez, M., del Pilar Moreno-Sanchez, R., Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services. PloS One, 11(3), 2016.
Farley, J., Costanza, R., Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics 69:11 (2010), 2060–2068.
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behaviour 25:2 (2004), 63–87.
Figueroa, F., Caro-Borrero, Á., Revollo-Fernández, D., Merino, L., Almeida-Leñero, L., Paré, L., Mazari-Hiriart, M., “I like to conserve the forest, but I also like the cash”. Socioeconomic factors influencing the motivation to be engaged in the Mexican Payment for Environmental Services Programme. Journal of Forest Economics 22 (2016), 36–51.
Fox J., Friendly M., Monette G. (2018). heplots: Visualizing Tests in Multivariate Linear Models. R package version 1.3-5. URL: < https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=heplots>.
Fraser, J., Clayton, S., Sickler, J., Taylor, A., Belonging at the zoo: Retired volunteers, conservation activism and collective identity. Ageing & Society 29:3 (2009), 351–368.
Frey, B.S., Oberholzer-Gee, F., The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review 87:4 (1997), 746–755.
García-Amado, L.R., Ruiz Pérez, M., Barrasa García, S., Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 89 (2013), 92–100.
Global Forest Watch. “Land cover in Bolivia”. From < www.globalforestwatch.org>; (Accessed on 04/03/2019).
Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., Wunder, S., How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development 33:9 (2005), 1511–1527.
Grillos, T., Bottazzi, P., Crespo, D., Asquith, N., Jones, J.P.G., In-kind conservation payments crowd in environmental values and increase support for government intervention: A randomized trial in Bolivia. Ecological Economics, 166, 2019, 106404, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106404.
Grillos, T., Economic vs non-material incentives for participation in an in-kind payments for ecosystem services program in Bolivia. Ecological Economics 131 (2017), 178–190.
Grima, N., Singh, S.J., Smetschka, B., Ringhofer, L., Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosystem Services 17 (2016), 24–32.
Groothuis, Peter, Miller, Gail, The Role of Social Distrust in Risk-Benefit Analysis: A Study of the Siting of a Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15 (1997), 241–257, 10.1023/A:1007757326382.
Guns, M., Vanacker, V., Forest cover change trajectories and their impact on landslide occurrence in the tropical Andes. Environmental Earth Sciences 70:7 (2013), 2941–2952.
Hansen, et al. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science, 2013, 10.1126/science.1244693.
Hayes, T.M., Payment for ecosystem services, sustained behavioural change, and adaptive management: Peasant perspectives in the Colombian Andes. Environmental Conservation 39:2 (2012), 144–153.
Hay, Robert, Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18:1 (1998), 5–29, 10.1006/jevp.1997.0060.
Henningsen, A., Toomet, O., maxLik: A package for maximum likelihood estimation in R. Computational Statistics 26:3 (2011), 443–458.
Henningsen, A. (2017). censReg: Censored Regression (Tobit) Models. R package version 0.5. < http://CRAN.R-Project.org/package=censReg>.
Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R., Tomera, A.N., Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behaviour: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education 18:2 (1987), 1–8.
Ibisch, P.L., Beck, S.G., Gerkmann, B., Carretero, A., La diversidad biológica. Ibisch, P.L., Mérida, G., (eds.) Biodiversidad: La Riqueza de Bolivia. Estado de conocimiento y conservación. Ministerio de Desarrollo sostenible, 2003, Editorial Fundación Amigos de la Naturaleza, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, 47–88.
Jin, M., Does social capital promote pro-environmental behaviours? Implications for collaborative governance. International Journal of Public Administration 36:6 (2013), 397–407.
Jones, N., Investigating the influence of social costs and benefits of environmental policies through social capital theory. Policy Sciences 43:3 (2010), 229–244.
Jones, N., Halvadakis, C.P., Sophoulis, C.M., Social capital and household solid waste management policies: A case study in Mytilene, Greece. Environmental Politics 20:2 (2011), 264–283.
Jones, N., Malesios, C., Botetzagias, I., The influence of social capital on willingness to pay for the environment among European citizens. European Societies 11:4 (2009), 511–530.
Jones, N., Sophoulis, C.M., Iosifides, T., Botetzagias, I., Evangelinos, K., The influence of social capital on environmental policy instruments. Environmental Politics 18:4 (2009), 595–611.
Jorgensen, Bradley, Stedman, Richard, Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21:3 (2001), 233–248, 10.1006/jevp.2001.0226.
Kaplan, D., Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. 2008, Sage Publications.
Kim, J., Kaplan, R., Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and behaviour 36:3 (2004), 313–340.
Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J., Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour?. Environmental education research 8:3 (2002), 239–260.
Norgaard, Kari Marie, Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life, 2011, The MIT Press.
Landell-Mills, N., & Porras, I. T. (2002). Silver bullet or fools' gold?: a global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor.
Lamarque, Pénélope, Meyfroidt, Patrick, Nettier, Baptiste, Lavorel, Sandra, How Ecosystem Services Knowledge and Values Influence Farmers’ Decision-Making. Plos One, 2014, 10.1371/journal.pone.0107572.
Lee, E., & Mahanty, S. S. (2009). Payments for environmental services and poverty reduction: risks and opportunities.
Levine, J., Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T., From rational actor to efficient complexity manager: Exorcising the ghost of Homo economicus with a unified synthesis of cognition research. Ecological Economics 114 (2015), 22–32.
Manzo, L.C., Devine-Wright, P., Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications. 2013, Routledge.
Meinhold, J.L., Malkus, A.J., Adolescent environmental behaviours: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference?. Environment and Behaviour 37:4 (2005), 511–532.
Meyfroidt, Patrick, Environmental Cognitions, Land Change and Social-Ecological Feedbacks: Local Case Studies of Forest Transition in Vietnam. Human Ecology, 2013, 367–392, 10.1007/s10745-012-9560-x.
Miranda, M., Porras, I. T., & Moreno, M. L. (2003). The social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: a quantitative field survey and analysis of the Virilla watershed, No. 1. IIED.
Moros, L., Vélez, M.A., Corbera, E., Payments for ecosystem services and motivational crowding in Colombia's Amazon Piedmont. Ecological Economics 156 (2019), 468–488.
Muradian, R., Payments for ecosystem services as incentives for collective action. Society & Natural Resources 26:10 (2013), 1155–1169.
Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., May, P.H., Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69:6 (2010), 1202–1208.
Neuteleers, S., Engelen, B., Talking money: How market-based valuation can undermine environmental protection. Ecological Economics 117 (2015), 253–260.
Ostrom, E., A behavioural approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review 92:1 (1998), 1–22.
Ostrom, E., Ahn, T.K., The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. Handbook of Social Capital, 2009, Edward Elgar Publishing, 17–35.
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., Platais, G., Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 33:2 (2005), 237–253.
Pattanayak, S.K., Wunder, S., Ferraro, P.J., Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4:2 (2010), 254–274.
Petts, J., Trust and waste management information expectation versus observation. Journal of Risk Research 1:4 (1998), 307–320.
Pretty, J., Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:5652 (2003), 1912–1914.
Pretty, J., Ward, H., Social capital and the environment. World Development 29:2 (2001), 209–227.
Proshansky, Harold, Fabian, Abbe, Kaminoff, Robert, Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3:1 (1983), 57–83, 10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8.
Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.Y., Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. 1994, Princeton University Press.
Rode, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Krause, T., Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics 117 (2015), 270–282.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL < https://www.R-project.org/>.
Ryan, Richard, Deci, Edward, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55:1 (2000), 68–78, 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 https://psycnet.apa.org.
Sanchez-Azofeifa, Arturo, Pfaff, Alexander, Robalino, Juan Andres, Boomhover, Judson, Costa Rica's Payment for Environmental Services Program: Intention, Implementation, and Impact. Conservation Biology 21 (2007), 1165–1173, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00751.x.
Selman, P., Social capital, sustainability and environmental planning. Planning Theory & Practice 2:1 (2001), 13–30.
Shove, E., Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A 42:6 (2010), 1273–1285.
Seroa da Motta, Ronaldo, Ortiz, Ramon Arigoni, Costs and Perceptions Conditioning Willingness to Accept Payments for Ecosystem Services in a Brazilian Case. Ecological Economics 147 (2018), 333–342, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.032.
Shove, E. (2012). Habits and their creatures.
Southgate, D., Wunder, S., Paying for watershed services in Latin America: A review of current initiatives. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28:3-5 (2009), 497–524.
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., Pidgeon, N.F., Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change 1:1 (2011), 46–49.
Stedman, R.C., Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behaviour from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behaviour 34:5 (2002), 561–581.
Stern, P.C., New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues 56:3 (2000), 407–424.
Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., White, K.M., The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology 38:3 (1999), 225–244.
Thøgersen, J., Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26:4 (2006), 247–261.
Tuan, Yi-Fu, Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. 1977, University of Minnesota Press.
van der Werff, E., Steg, L., Keizer, K., The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34 (2013), 55–63.
Van Hecken, G., Bastiaensen, J., Payments for ecosystem services in Nicaragua: Do market-based approaches work?. Development and Change 41:3 (2010), 421–444.
Vatn, A., An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69:6 (2010), 1245–1252.
Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Bojö, J., Sjaastad, E., Kobugabe Berg, G., Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy and Economics 9:7 (2007), 869–879.
Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D., Modern applied statistics with S. 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Wakefield, S.E.L., Elliott, S.J., Eyles, J.D., Cole, D.C., Taking environmental action: The role of local composition, context, and collective. Environmental Management 37:1 (2006), 40–53.
Wickham, H., ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2016, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Wiik, E., D'Annunzio, R., Pynegar, E.L., Crespo, D., Asquith, N.M., Jones, J.P.G., Experimental evaluation of the impact of a payment for environmental services program on deforestation. Conservation Science and Practice, 2019 e8.
Wiik, E., Jones, J.P.G., Pynegar, E., Bottazzi, P., Asquith, N., Gibbons, J., Kontoleon, A., Exploring mechanisms and impacts of an incentive-based conservation program with evidence from a Randomized Control Trial. Conservation Biology 34:5 (2020), 1076–1088.
Woolcock, M., Narayan, D., Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer 15:2 (2000), 225–249.
Wunder, S., Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics?. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 2006.
Wunder, S., Payments for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics 13:3 (2008), 279–297.
Wunder, S., Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 117 (2015), 234–243.
Wunder, S., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Forests, livelihoods, and conservation: Broadening the empirical base. World Development 64:S1 (2014), S1–S11.
Wunder, S., Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65:4 (2008), 834–852.
Zbinden, S., Lee, D.R., Paying for environmental services: An analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA program. World Development 33:2 (2005), 255–272.