Article (Scientific journals)
How Stable are the Major Performance Measures?
Bodson, Laurent; Coën, Alain; Hübner, Georges
2008In Journal of Performance Measurement, (Fall), p. 21-30
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Published.pdf
Publisher postprint (64.89 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] In this paper, the authors compare three usual performance measures of actively managed portfolios: Jensen’s Alpha, the Information Ratio (IR), and the newly proposed Generalized Treynor Ratio (GTR) introduced by Hübner (2005). They focus on model specification, sensitivity, and persistence for a large sample of mutual funds from January 1996 to December 2006. Their results reveal that fund classification made with the GTR displays a higher stability while the IR exhibits a greater capacity to reveal persistence in performance. The value of alpha is clearly contingent on model specifications and thus needs to be considered with greater caution to perform ranking of portfolio managers.
Disciplines :
Finance
Author, co-author :
Bodson, Laurent ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC - École de gestion de l'ULiège > Gestion financière
Coën, Alain ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC - École de gestion de l'ULiège > Gestion de l'industrie des fonds d'investissement
Hübner, Georges  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC - École de gestion de l'ULiège > Gestion financière
Language :
English
Title :
How Stable are the Major Performance Measures?
Publication date :
November 2008
Journal title :
Journal of Performance Measurement
ISSN :
1522-8746
Publisher :
Spaulding Group
Issue :
Fall
Pages :
21-30
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 17 December 2008

Statistics


Number of views
282 (33 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
21 (11 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi