Download

Full Text

See more details

X (1)

Mendeley (2)

10

CITATIONS

10 Total citations

5 Recent citations

2.46 Field Citation Ratio

n/a Relative Citation Ratio

publications

12

supporting

0

mentioning

5

contrasting

0

Smart Citations

12

0

5

0

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

• Antoine, X., Barucq, H., Bendali, A., Bayliss–Turkel-like radiation conditions on surfaces of arbitrary shape. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 229:1 (1999), 184–211.
• Antoine, X., Darbas, M., Alternative integral equations for the iterative solution of acoustic scattering problems. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 58:1 (2005), 107–128.
• Antoine, X., Darbas, M., Generalized combined field integral equations for the iterative solution of the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation. Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 41:1 (2007), 147–167.
• Antoine, X., Darbas, M., Lu, Y.Y., An improved surface radiation condition for high-frequency acoustic scattering problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195:33–36 (2006), 4060–4074.
• Bachelot, A., Lange, V., Time dependent integral method for Maxwell's system with impedance boundary condition. WIT Trans. Model. Simul., 11, 1995.
• Bayliss, A., Gunzburger, M., Turkel, E., Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of elliptic equations in exterior regions. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 42:2 (1982), 430–451.
• Bendali, A., Boubendir, Y., Fares, M.B., A FETI-like domain decomposition method for coupling finite elements and boundary elements in large-size problems of acoustic scattering. Comput. Struct. 85:9 (2007), 526–535.
• Bérenger, J.-P., A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Comput. Phys. 114:2 (1994), 185–200.
• Bergmann, P.G., The wave equation in a medium with a variable index of refraction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 17:4 (1946), 329–333.
• Bermúdez, A., Hervella-Nieto, L., Prieto, A., Rodríguez, R., Perfectly matched layers for time-harmonic second order elliptic problems. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 17:1 (2010), 77–107.
• Börm, S., Efficient Numerical Methods for Non-Local Operators: H2-Matrix Compression, Algorithms and Analysis, vol. 14. 2010, European Mathematical Society.
• Boubendir, Y., Antoine, X., Geuzaine, C., A quasi-optimal non-overlapping domain decomposition algorithm for the Helmholtz equation. J. Comput. Phys. 231:2 (2012), 262–280.
• Boubendir, Y., Bendali, A., Fares, M.B., Coupling of a non-overlapping domain decomposition method for a nodal finite element method with a boundary element method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 73:11 (2008), 1624–1650.
• Boubendir, Y., Jerez-Hanckes, C., Pérez-Arancibia, C., Turc, C., Domain decomposition methods based on quasi-optimal transmission operators for the solution of Helmholtz transmission problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02694, 2017.
• Brezzi, F., Johnson, C., On the coupling of boundary integral and finite element methods. Calcolo 16:2 (1979), 189–201.
• Caudron, B., Couplages FEM-BEM faibles et optimisés pour des problèmes de diffraction harmoniques en acoustique et en électromagnétisme. PhD thesis, 2018, Université de Lorraine, France, and Université de Liège, Belgique.
• Colton, D., Kress, R., Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory. 2013, SIAM.
• Costabel, M., Symmetric methods for the coupling of finite elements and boundary elements (invited contribution). Mathematical and Computational Aspects, 1987, Springer, 411–420.
• de La Bourdonnaye, A., Some formulations coupling finite element and integral equation methods for Helmholtz equation and electromagnetism. Numer. Math. 69:3 (1995), 257–268.
• Després, B., Méthodes de décomposition de domaine pour les problèmes de propagation d'ondes en régime harmonique. Le théorème de Borg pour l'équation de Hill vectorielle. PhD thesis, 1991.
• Dolean, V., Jolivet, P., Nataf, F., An Introduction to Domain Decomposition Methods: Algorithms, Theory, and Parallel Implementation. 2015, SIAM.
• Dular, P., Geuzaine, C., Henrotte, F., Legros, W., A general environment for the treatment of discrete problems and its application to the finite element method. IEEE Trans. Magn. 34:5 (1998), 3395–3398.
• Engquist, B., Majda, A., Absorbing boundary conditions for numerical simulation of waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5 (1977), 1765–1766.
• Ernst, O.G., Gander, M.J., Why it is difficult to solve Helmholtz problems with classical iterative methods. Numer. Anal. Multiscale Probl. 83 (2012), 325–363.
• Gander, M.J., Magoulès, F., Nataf, F., Optimized Schwarz methods without overlap for the Helmholtz equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24:1 (2002), 38–60.
• Gatica, G.N., Variational formulations of transmission problems via FEM, BEM and DtN mappings. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 182:3–4 (2000), 341–354.
• Greengard, L., Rokhlin, V., A new version of the fast multipole method for the Laplace equation in three dimensions. Acta Numer. 6 (1997), 229–269.
• Hackbusch, W., Hierarchical Matrices: Algorithms and Analysis, vol. 49. 2015, Springer.
• Ihlenburg, F., Babuska, I., Dispersion analysis and error estimation of Galerkin finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 38 (1995), 3745–3774.
• Johnson, C., Nédélec, J.-C., On the coupling of boundary integral and finite element methods. Math. Comput. 35:152 (1980), 1063–1079.
• Lahaye, D., Tang, J., Vuik, K., Modern Solvers for Helmholtz Problems. 2017, Springer.
• Langer, U., Steinbach, O., Coupled boundary and finite element tearing and interconnecting methods. Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering, 2005, 83–97.
• Lions, P.-L., On the Schwarz alternating method III: a variant for non overlapping subdomains. Third International Symposium on Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Houston, Texas, 1989, 20–22.
• Modave, A., Geuzaine, C., Antoine, X., Corner treatments for high-order local absorbing boundary conditions in high-frequency acoustic scattering. J. Comput. Phys., 401, 2020, 109029.
• Modave, A., Royer, A., Antoine, X., Geuzaine, C., A non-overlapping domain decomposition method with high-order transmission conditions and cross-point treatment for Helmholtz problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 368, 2020, 1131622020.
• Nédélec, J.-C., Acoustic and Electromagnetic Equations: Integral Representations for Harmonic Problems, vol. 144. 2001, Springer-Verlag.
• Of, G., Steinbach, O., Is the one-equation coupling of finite and boundary element methods always stable?. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 93:6–7 (2013), 476–484.
• Śmigaj, W., Betcke, T., Arridge, S., Phillips, J., Schweiger, M., Solving boundary integral problems with BEM++. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 41:2 (2015), 6:1–6:40.
• Solin, P., Segeth, K., Dolezel, I., Higher-Order Finite Element Methods. 2003, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
• Toselli, A., Widlund, O.B., Domain Decomposition Methods: Algorithms and Theory, vol. 34. 2005, Springer.
• Turkel, E., Yefet, A., Absorbing PML boundary layers for wave-like equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 27:4 (1998), 533–557.
• Zienkiewicz, O.C., Kelly, D.W., Bettess, P., The coupling of the finite element method and boundary solution procedures. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 11:2 (1977), 355–375.