[en] Circular building design is a concept that is gaining great interest from architects, construction professionals, and their clients but is still rarely adopted in practice. One of the earliest design decisions architects and developers should make to design a circular building is to determine the building’s construction system. The choice of constructive and structural systems, such as columns, beams, and slabs, is crucial to upgrade the reuse cycles in the future. Flexible construction systems can make it easier to dismantle the structures and recover, upgrade, modify, or transform building materials. Therefore, this paper assesses the carbon emission impacts of two construction systems for an office building in Belgium using life cycle assessment (LCA) and circularity criteria. One-Click LCA software was used for the calculations. Parametric analysis took place for two construction systems scenarios involving a steel structure and a timber structure. Life Cycle Assessment and comparisons of the various construction systems are made based on ISO 14040, 14044, and CEN/TC 350 standards with a focus on carbon neutrality. The results show that using local plant-based materials such as wood can drastically reduce office buildings’ carbon footprint. Based on the sensitivity analysis results, the overall global warming potential impact is mostly sensitive to the construction material’s weight and reuse and dismantling ability. This paper provides a better understanding of building structural systems; to inform architects about the circularity potential of different construction systems.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Attia, S. (2018). Regenerative and positive impact architecture: Learning from case studies. Springer International Publishing, New York, USA. ISBN 978-2930909004, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66718-8
Heisel F. and Rau-Oberhuber S. 2020 Calculation and evaluation of circularity indicators for the built environment using the case studies of UMAR and Madaster Journal of Cleaner Production 243 118482
Cottafava, Dario, Ritzen and Michiel 2021 Circularity indicator for residential buildings: Addressing the gap between embodied impacts and design aspects Resources Conservation and Recycling 164 105120
E. M. F. (EMF), Circularity indicators: An approach to measuring circularity, https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/insight/Circularity-Indicators_Project-Overview_May2015.pdf, 2015. Online; accessed 19 March 2020
Tallini A. and Cedola L. 2018 A review of the properties of recycled and waste materials for energy refurbishment of existing buildings towards the requirements of NZEB Energy Procedia 148 868-75 Aug
Passer A, Lasvaux S, Allacker K, De Lathauwer D, Spirinckx C, Wittstock B et al 2015 Environmental product declarations entering the building sector: critical reflections based on 5 to 10 years experience in different European countries Int J Life Cycle Assess 20 1199-1212
Cambier C., Galle W and De Temmerman N. 2020 Research and Development Directions for Design Support Tools for Circular Building Buildings 10 142
Durmisevic, E. Reversible Building Design: Reversible Building design guidelines [Internet]. University of Twente; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 26]. Available from: https://www.bamb2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Reversible-Building-Design-guidelines-and-protocol.pdf
Antonini E., Boeri A, Lauria M and Giglio F. 2020 Reversibility and durability as potential indicators for Circular building Technologies Sustainability 12 7659
Attia S. and Al-Obaidy M. 2021 Crossing Boundaries Parkstad (Parkstadt, The Netherlands: Zuyd Uninversity) Design criteria for circular building
Grover, R. (2020). Towards Zero Carbon Buildings: Reducing the embodied carbon footprint of a construction (Master thesis); TU Delft. Available from: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A98e2c46c-7321-4eab-9f88-c3d10912003a Accessed: 28.02.2021
Huberman N. and Pearlmutter D. 2008 A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert Energy and Buildings 40 837-848
ISO I 14040 (2006): environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. London: British Standards Institution
ISO I 14044 (2006): environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization
Vogtländer, J. G. (2010). A practical guide to LCA for students, designers and business managers: cradle-to-grave and cradle-to-cradle. VSSD
EN 15978. Sustainability of construction works-Assessment of environmental performance of buildings-Calculation method. BrussBelgEurComm Stand. 2011
One Click LCA. Calculate your environmental impacts in minutes. Available from: https://www.oneclicklca.com/ Accessed: 15.11.2020
One Click LCA. 90,000+ data points: up-to-date, verified and localised. Available from: https://www.oneclicklca.com/support/faq-and-guidance/documentation/database/ Accessed: 15.02.2021
Engineeringclicks. Density of wood in kg/m3, g/cm3, lb/ft3-the ultimate guide. Availablel from: https://www.engineeringclicks.com/density-of-wood/ Accessed: 05.11.2020
Maiak. Calculator for Beams-HEB (IPB). Availablel from: https://www.maiak-m.bg/en/calculator/i15/Beams-HEB-(IPB).html Accessed: 05.11.2020
Vlaanderen is energie. E-peil: eisvoorniet-residentiëlegebouwen (2021). Available from: https://www.energiesparen.be/EPB-pedia/E-peil/eis-niet-residentieel-2021 Accessed: 27.11.2020
Attia S. 2018 Net zero energy buildings (nzeb) 1 (Cambridge, MA: Elsevier)
Sturgis, S. (2017). Embodied and whole life carbon assessment for architects. Riba Publishing. Available from: https://www.architecture.com/-/media/gathercontent/whole-life-carbon-assessment-for-architects/additional-documents/11241wholelifecarbonguidancev7pdf.pdf
Kamp C. circulairbouwen;'t Centrum. Available from: https://www.kampc.be/tcentrum/circulair-bouwen-t-centrum Accessed: 20.09.2020
Pombo O., Rivela B and Neila J. 2019 Life cycle thinking toward sustainable development policy-making: The case of energy retrofits J Clean Prod. 206 267-81 Jan
Attia S., Santos M C, Al-Obaidy M and Baskar M. 2021 Crossing Boundaries Parkstad (Parkstadt, The Netherlands: Zuyd Uninversity) Leadership of EU member States in building carbon footprint regulations and their role in promoting circular building design
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.