Health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury: deriving value sets for the QOLIBRI-OS for Italy, The Netherlands and The United Kingdom

Voormolen, D. C.; Polinder, S.; von Steinbuechel, N.; Feng, Y.; Wilson, L.; Oppe, M.; Haagsma, J. A.; Åkerlund, C.; Adams, H.; Amrein, K.; Andelic, N.; Andreassen, L.; Anke, A.; Antoni, A.; Audibert, G.; Azouvi, P.; Azzolini, M. L.; Bartels, R.; Barzó, P.; Beauvais, R.; Beer, R.; Bellander, B.-M.; Belli, A.; Benali, H.; Berardino, M.; Beretta, L.; Blaabjerg, M.; Bragge, P.; Brazinova, A.; Brinck, V.; Brooker, J.; Brorsson, C.; Buki, A.; Bullinger, M.; Cabeleira, M.; Caccioppola, A.; Calappi, E.; Calvi, M. R.; Cameron, P.; Lozano, G. C.; Carbonara, M.; Castaño-León, A. M.; Chevallard, G.; Chieregato, A.; Citerio, G.; Cnossen, M.; Coburn, M.; Coles, J.; Cooper, J. D.; Correia, M.; Čović, A.; Curry, N.; Czeiter, E.; Czosnyka, M.; Dahyot-Fizelier, C.; Dawes, H.; De Keyser, Véronique; Degos, V.; Corte, F. D.; Boogert, H.; Depreitere, B.; Đilvesi, Đ.; Dixit, A.; Donoghue, E.; Dreier, J.; Dulière, G.-L.; Ercole, A.; Esser, P.; Ezer, E.; Fabricius, M.; Feigin, V. L.; Foks, K.; Frisvold, S.; Furmanov, A.; Gagliardo, P.; Galanaud, D.; Gantner, D.; Gao, G.; George, P; Ghuysen, Alexandre; Giga, L.; Glocker, B.; Golubovic, J.; Gomez, P. A.; Gratz, J.; Gravesteijn, B.; Grossi, F.; L.Gruen, R.; Gupta, D.; Haitsma, I.; Helbok, R.; Helseth, E.; Horton, L.; Huijben, J.; Hutchinson, P. J.; Jacobs, B.; Jankowski, S.; Jarrett, M.; Jiang, J.-Y.; Jones, K.; Karan–, M.; Kolias, A. G.; Kompanje, E.; Kondziella, D.; Koskinen, L.-O.; Kovács, N.; Lagares, A.; Lanyon, L.; Laureys, Steven; Lecky, F.; Lefering, R.; Legrand, Victor; Lejeune, Aurélie; Levi, L.; Lightfoot, R.; Lingsma, H.; Maas, A. I. R.; Maegele, M.; Majdan, M.; Manara, A.; Manley, G.; Martino, C.; Maréchal, H.; Mattern, J.; McFadyen, C.; McMahon, C.; Melegh, B.; Menon, D.; Menovsky, T.; Mulazzi, D.; Muraleedharan, V.; Murray, L.; Nair, N.; Negru, A.; Nelson, D.; Newcombe, V.; Nieboer, D.; Noirhomme, Quentin; Nyirádi, J.; Olubukola, O.; Oresic, M.; Ortolano, F.; Palotie, A.; Parizel, P. M.; Payen, J.-F.; Perera, N.; Perlbarg, V.; Persona, P.; Peul, W.; Piippo-Karjalainen, A.; Pirinen, M.; Ples, H.; Pomposo, I.; Posti, J. P.; Puybasset, L.; Radoi, A.; Ragauskas, A.; Raj, R.; Rambadagalla, M.; Real, R.; Rhodes, J.; Richardson, S.; Richter, S.; Ripatti, S.; Rocka, S.; Roe, C.; Roise, O.; Rosand, J.; Rosenfeld, J. V.; Rosenlund, C.; Rosenthal, G.; Rossaint, R.; Rossi, S.; Rueckert, D.; Rusnák, M.; Sahuquillo, J.; Sakowitz, O.; Sanchez-Porras, R.; Sandor, J.; Schäfer, N.; Schmidt, S.; Schoechl, H.; Schoonman, G.; Schou, R. F.; Schwendenwein, E.; Sewalt, C.; Skandsen, T.; Smielewski, P.; Sorinola, A.; Stamatakis, E.; Stanworth, S.; Stevanovic, A.; Stevens, R.; Stewart, W.; Steyerberg, E. W.; Stocchetti, N.; Sundström, N.; Synnot, A.; Takala, R.; Tamás, V.; Tamosuitis, T.; Taylor, M. S.; Ao, B. T.; Tenovuo, O.; Theadom, A.; Thomas, M.; Tibboel, D.; Timmers, M.; Tolias, C.; Trapani, T.; Tudora, C. M.; Vajkoczy, P.; Vallance, S.; Valeinis, E.; Vámos, Z.; Van der Steen, G.; van der Naalt, J.; van Dijck, J. T. J. M.; van Essen, T.; Van Hecke, W.; van Heugten, C.; Van Praag, D.; Vyvere, T. V.; Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey; van Wijk, R. P. J.; Vargiolu, A.; Vega, E.; Velt, K.; Verheyden, J.; Vespa, P. M.; Vik, A.; Vilcinis, R.; Volovici, V.; von Steinbüchel, N.; Voormolen, D.; Vulekovic, P.; Wang, K. K. W.; Wiegers, E.; Williams, G.; Wolf, S.; Yang, Z.; Ylén, P.; Younsi, A.; Zeiler, F. A.; Zelinkova, V.; Ziverte, A.; Zoerle, T.; the CENTER-TBI participants and investigators

doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02583-6

Article (Scientific journals)

Health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury: deriving value sets for the QOLIBRI-OS for Italy, The Netherlands and The United Kingdom

Voormolen, D. C.; Polinder, S.; von Steinbuechel, N. et al.

2020 • In Quality of Life Research

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/257705

DOI
10.1007/s11136-020-02583-6

PubMed
32671617

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury.pdf

Publisher postprint (891.58 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Health utilities; Health-related quality of life; Quality of life after brain injury overall scale (QOLIBRI-OS); Traumatic brain injury; Value set

Abstract :

[en] Purpose: The Quality of Life after Brain Injury overall scale (QOLIBRI-OS) measures health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to derive value sets for the QOLIBRI-OS in three European countries, which will allow calculation of utility scores for TBI health states. Methods: A QOLIBRI-OS value set was derived by using discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and visual analogue scales (VAS) in general population samples from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. A three-stage procedure was used: (1) A selection of health states, covering the entire spectrum of severity, was defined; (2) General population samples performed the health state valuation task using a web-based survey with three VAS questions and an at random selection of sixteen DCEs; (3) DCEs were analysed using a conditional logistic regression and were then anchored on the VAS data. Utility scores for QOLIBRI-OS health states were generated resulting in estimates for all potential health states. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 13,623 respondents. The biggest weight increase for all attributes is seen from “slightly” to “not at all satisfied”, resulting in the largest impact on HRQoL. “Not at all satisfied with how brain is working” should receive the greatest weight in utility calculations in all three countries. Conclusion: By transforming the QOLIBRI-OS into utility scores, we enabled the application in economic evaluations and in summary measures of population health, which may be used to inform decision-makers on the best interventions and strategies for TBI patients. © 2020, The Author(s).

Disciplines :

Public health, health care sciences & services

Author, co-author :

Voormolen, D. C.; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Netherlands

Polinder, S.; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Netherlands

von Steinbuechel, N.; Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Georg-August-University, Waldweg 37, Göttingen, 37073, Germany

Feng, Y.; Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

Wilson, L.; Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

Oppe, M.; Axentiva Solutions, C/Calvario, 271-B 1º IZQ, Tacoronte, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38350, Spain

Haagsma, J. A.; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Netherlands, Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Åkerlund, C.

Adams, H.

Amrein, K.

More authors (238 more)

Language :

English

Title :

Health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury: deriving value sets for the QOLIBRI-OS for Italy, The Netherlands and The United Kingdom

Publication date :

2020

Journal title :

Quality of Life Research

ISSN :

0962-9343

eISSN :

1573-2649

Publisher :

Springer

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

European Projects :

FP7 - 602150 - CENTER-TBI - Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI

Funders :

EU - European Union [BE]

Available on ORBi :

since 07 March 2021

Statistics

Number of views

115 (6 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

13 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Menon, D. K., Schwab, K., Wright, D. W., Maas, A. I., & Demographics, Clinical Assessment Working Group of the I, Interagency Initiative toward Common Data Elements for Research on Traumatic Brain I, Psychological H. (2010). Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(11), 1637–1640.
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Adelson, P. D., Andelic, N., Bell, M. J., Belli, A., et al. (2017). Traumatic brain injury: Integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurology, 16(12), 987–1048.
Maas, A. I., Menon, D. K., Steyerberg, E. W., Citerio, G., Lecky, F., Manley, G. T., et al. (2015). Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): A prospective longitudinal observational study. Neurosurgery, 76(1), 67–80.
McIntosh, E., & Luengo-Fernandez, R. (2006). Economic evaluation. Part 1: Introduction to the concepts of economic evaluation in health care. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care., 32(2), 107–112.
Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5(1), 1–30.
Cole, A., Shah, K., Mulhern, B., Feng, Y., & Devlin, N. (2018). Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states 'in context' using a discrete choice experiment. The European Journal of Health Economics, 19(4), 595–605.
von Steinbuechel, N., Petersen, C., Bullinger, M., & Group Q. (2005). Assessment of health-related quality of life in persons after traumatic brain injury–development of the Qolibri, a specific measure. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplementum, 93, 43–49.
von Steinbuechel, N., Wilson, L., Gibbons, H., Muehlan, H., Schmidt, H., Schmidt, S., et al. (2012). QOLIBRI overall scale: A brief index of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 83(11), 1041–1047.
von Steinbuchel, N., Wilson, L., Gibbons, H., Hawthorne, G., Hofer, S., Schmidt, S., et al. (2010). Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): Scale validity and correlates of quality of life. Journal of Neurotrauma, 27(7), 1157–1165.
Goodwin, E., & Green, C. (2016). A systematic review of the literature on the development of condition-specific preference-based measures of health. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 14(2), 161–183.
Brooks, R. (1996). euroqol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53–72.
Excellence NIfHC. 2013.
Brazier, J. E., Rowen, D., Mavranezouli, I., Tsuchiya, A., Young, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2012). Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome). Health Technology Assessment, 16(32), 1–114.
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McFadden, D. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics., 3(4), 303–328.
Krabbe, P. F. M., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Lamers, L. M., & Busschbach, J. J. V. (2006). Testing the interval-level measurement property of multi-item visual analogue scales. Quality of Life Research., 15(10), 1651–1661.
Hakim, Z., & Pathak, D. S. (1999). Modelling the EuroQol data: A comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modelling. Health Economics, 8(2), 103–116.
Ratcliffe, J., Brazier, J., Tsuchiya, A., Symonds, T., & Brown, M. (2009). Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire. Health Economics, 18(11), 1261–1276.
McKenzie, L., Cairns, J., & Osman, L. (2001). Symptom-based outcome measures for asthma: The use of discrete choice methods to assess patient preferences. Health Policy, 57(3), 193–204.
McCabe, C., Brazier, J., Gilks, P., Tsuchiya, A., Roberts, J., O'Hagan, A., et al. (2006). Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. J Health Econ., 25(3), 418–431.
Szeinbach, S. L., Barnes, J. H., McGhan, W. F., Murawski, M. M., & Corey, R. (1999). Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences. Drug Information Journal., 33(3), 849–858.
Louviere, J. J., & Woodworth, G. (1983). Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research., 20(4), 350–367.
Stolk, E. A., Oppe, M., Scalone, L., & Krabbe, P. F. (2010). Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: The case of the EQ-5D. Value Health., 13(8), 1005–1013.
Oppe MvH, B. (2017). EuroQol Working Paper Series—The "power" of eliciting EQ-5D-5L values: the experimental design of the EQ-VT.
Devlin, N., Shah, K., Feng, Y., Mulhern, B., & Van Hout, B. (2016) Valuing Health-Related Quality of Life: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England.
Oppe, M., Devlin, N. J., van Hout, B., Krabbe, P. F. M., & de Charro, F. (2014). A program of methodological research to arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol. Value in Health., 17(4), 445–453.
Bansback, N., Brazier, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Anis, A. (2012). Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. Journal of Health Economics., 31(1), 306–318.
Clark, M. D., Determann, D., Petrou, S., Moro, D., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2014). Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics., 32(9), 883–902.
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Ryan, M., & Gerard, K. (2012). Discrete choice experiments in health economics: A review of the literature. Health Economics, 21(2), 145–172.
Hauber, A. B., Gonzalez, J. M., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G., Prior, T., Marshall, D. A., Cunningham, C., et al. (2016). Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health., 19(4), 300–315.
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Essink-Bot, M. L., Meerding, W. J., Pols, H. A., Koes, B. W., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2008). Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporosis International, 19(7), 1029–1037.
Feng, Y., Devlin, N., Shah, K., Mulhern, B., Van Hout, B. (2016). New methods for modelling EQ-5D-5L value sets: An application to English Data.
Umlauf, N., Klein, N., & Zeileis, A. (2018). BAMLSS: Bayesian additive models for location, scale, and shape (and Beyond). Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics., 27(3), 612–627.
Umlauf, N., Klein, N., Simon, T., & Zeileis, A. (2019). bamlss: A Lego Toolbox for Flexible Bayesian Regression (and Beyond).
Ryan, M., Gerard, K., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (2008). Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mulhern, B., Longworth, L., Brazier, J., Rowen, D., Bansback, N., Devlin, N., et al. (2013). Binary choice health state valuation and mode of administration: Head-to-head comparison of online and CAPI. Value Health., 16(1), 104–113.
Kuklys, W. (2002). Stated choice methods: analysis and application, Jordan J. Louviere, David A. Hensher and Joffre D. Swait, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0-521-78830-7. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17(6), 701–4.
de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2009). Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Care: Theory and applications. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Jonker, M. F., Donkers, B., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & Stolk, E. A. (2018). Effect of Level overlap and color coding on attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments. Value in Health., 21(7), 767–771.