Article (Scientific journals)
Standard vs computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing customized self-ligating systems using indirect bonding with both.
Jackers, Nastasia; MAES, Nathalie; Lambert, France et al.
2021In Angle Orthodontist
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2020 Jackers Charavet.pdf
Publisher postprint (244.37 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Adult patients; CAD/CAM; Customized orthodontic; Indirect bonding; Tooth movement
Abstract :
[en] OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment duration and quality between standard vs computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized self-ligating systems using indirect bonding with both. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This comparative trial included 24 patients: 12 treated with a CAD/CAM custom indirect bonding self-ligating system (CAD/CAM) and 12 others treated with an indirect bonding self-ligating standard system (I-STD). For each group, overall orthodontic treatment (OT) time was calculated and included the time needed to place each arch as well as the duration of the alignment and fine-tuning phases. The quality of the final result was analyzed using the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups except for age, which was slightly lower in the I-SDT group. Overall OT time was increased by 26% in the I-STD group compared with the CAD/CAM group (497 ± 40 days vs 393 ± 55 days, P = 0.0002) due to a shorter fine-tuning phase in the latter group (P<0.01). No difference was found between the groups for alignment phase. Quality of the final result was similar (I-STD, 25.7 ± 6.1; CAD/CAM, 21.6 ± 6.3) among the groups. Finally, no difference was found in the PROMs variables. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a 26% longer OT time when compared with the CAD/CAM customized bracket system, the indirect bonding self-ligating bracket system demonstrated the same quality of treatment. PROMs demonstrated a high level of acceptance and satisfaction for both techniques.
Research Center/Unit :
d‐BRU - Dental Biomaterials Research Unit - ULiège
Disciplines :
Dentistry & oral medicine
Author, co-author :
Jackers, Nastasia
MAES, Nathalie ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de gestion des systèmes d'informations (GSI) > Secteur d'appui à la recherche clinique et biostatistique
Lambert, France ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences dentaires > Chirurgie orale et parodontologie
Albert, Adelin  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Département des sciences de la santé publique
Charavet, Carole ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences dentaires > Département des sciences dentaires
Language :
English
Title :
Standard vs computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing customized self-ligating systems using indirect bonding with both.
Publication date :
2021
Journal title :
Angle Orthodontist
ISSN :
0003-3219
eISSN :
1945-7103
Publisher :
EH Angle Orthodontists Research & Education Foundation, United States - Wisconsin
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 06 January 2021

Statistics


Number of views
100 (8 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
6 (6 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
12
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
12
OpenCitations
 
4
OpenAlex citations
 
13

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi