Forest modelling; Individual tree models; Large scale simulation; Mixed forests; Forest growth and yield; Selective thinning; Tree recruitment
Abstract :
[en] SIMREG is a non-deterministic tree-level distance independent forest model that can simulate forest growth, yield and management on a regional scale while representing the wide diversity of composition, structure and management found in forest stands. It is composed of several sub-models to represent the main forest dynamics (growth, recruitment, removal, clearcut and reforestation) and to account for species composition, stand density, tree size and social status, forest ownership type and some sites characteristics. We used the data collected by the permanent forest inventory of Wallonia (IPRFW) between 1994 and 2015 to calibrate SIMREG and forecast the development of Wallonia's 479 500 ha of productive forest (465 million simulated trees) until 2050. According to our simulation, the harvesting rate of Norway spruce (the main production species) is currently unsustainable and it is gradually being replaced by other species such as Douglas-fir, larch and various hardwoods. It appears that in terms of total softwood volume production, the higher production level of Douglas-fir and larch should eventually compensate for the decline in spruce. In contrast, the harvest rate in hardwood stands is around 75% of the annual yield, resulting in a steady increase in the total hardwood stock of about 600 000 m³ per year. Our methodology is easily replicable and the data required for sub-model calibration are consistent with those measured by most permanent NFIs, so our forest simulation model could be adapted to other regions and countries.
Alderweireld M., Burnay F., Pitchugin M., Lecomte H. 2015. Inventaire forestier wallon. Résultats 1994-2012. SPW, DGO3, DNF, Direction des Ressources forestières, jambes, 236 pp.
Andreassen, K., Tomter, S.M., Basal area growth models for individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. For. Ecol. Manage. 180 (2003), 11–24.
Baker, D.J., Richards, G., Grainger, A., Gonzalez, P., Brown, S., DeFries, R., Held, A., Kellndorfer, J., Ndunda, P., Ojima, D., Skrovseth, P.E., Achieving forest carbon information with higher certainty: a five-part plan. Environ. Sci. Policy 13 (2015), 249–260.
Barreiro S., Schelhaas M.-.J., McRoberts R.E., Kändler G. 2017. Forest Inventory-based projection systems for wood and biomass availability. Springer, Managing Forest Ecosystems 29, 330 pp.
Bievelet, C., Henin, J.-.M., Jourez, B., Hébert, J., Lecomte, H., Le douglas en région wallonne, état des lieux et tendances. Forêt wallonne 90 (2007), 27–39.
Blanco, J.A., Améztegui, A., Rodríguez, F., Modelling forest ecosystems: a crossroad between scales, techniques and applications. Ecol. Modell., 425, 2020, 109030.
Blanco, J.A., de Andrés, E.G., San Emeterio, L., Lo, Y.H., Modelling mixed forest stands: methodological challenges and approaches. In Dev. Environ. Modell. 27 (2015), 189–215.
Burkhart, H., Tomé, M., Modeling Forest Trees and Stands. 2012, Springer, 458.
Cameron, A.D., Importance of early selective thinning in the development of long‐term stand stability and improved log quality: a review. Forestry 75:1 (2002), 25–35.
Chertov, O., Komarov, A., Loukianov, A., Mikhailov, A., Nadporozhskaya, M., Zubkova, E., The use of forest ecosystem model EFIMOD for research and practical implementation at forest stand local and regional levels. Ecol. Modell. 194 (2006), 227–232.
Claessens, H., Natura 2000 menace-t-il l'approvisionnement wallon de l'industrie de première transformation des résineux ?. Silva Belgica 113 (2006), 10–13 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2268/21356.
Courbaud, B., Goreaud, F., Ph., Dreyfus, Bonnet, F.R., Evaluating thinning strategies using a tree distance dependent growth model: some examples based on the CAPSIS software “uneven-aged spruce forests’’ module. For. Ecol. Manage. 145 (2001), 15–28.
Dagnelie P., Rudy P., Rondeux J., Thill A. 1985. Tables de cubage des arbres et des peuplements forestiers. Les presses agronomiques de Gembloux, 148 pp.
Deleuze, C., Pain, O., Dhote, J.-.F., Herve, J.-.C., A flexible radial increment model for individual trees in pure even-aged stands. Ann. For. Sci. 61 (2004), 327–335.
DNF 1997. Circulaire n°2619 relative aux Aménagements dans les bois soumis au régime forestier. URL: http://etat.environnement.wallonie.be/files/indicateurs/FFH/FFH%202/Circulaire-DNF-2619.pdf.
Dufour-Kowalski, S., Courbaud, B., Dreyfus, P., Meredieu, C., de Coligny, F., Capsis: an open software framework and community for forest growth modelling. Ann. For. Sci. 69 (2012), 221–233.
Gamborg, C., Larsen, J.B., ‘Back to nature’—A sustainable future for forestry?. For. Ecol. Manage. 179:1–3 (2003), 559–571.
Hébert, J., Herman, M., Jourez, B., Sylviculture et qualité du bois de l’épicéa en région wallonne. Forêt wallonne ASBL, 2002, 157.
Huang, S., Ramirez, C., McElhaney, M., Evans, K., F3: simulating spatiotemporal forest change from field inventory, remote sensing, growth modeling, and management actions. For. Ecol. Manage. 415 (2018), 26–37.
Huber, M.O., Eastaugh, C.S., Gschwantner, T., et al. Comparing simulations of three conceptually different forest models with National Forest Inventory data. Environ. Modell. Softw. 40 (2013), 88–97.
Kohavi, R., A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2, 1995, 1137–1143.
Latte, N., Perin, J., Lejeune, P., Evolution récente des surfaces forestières et de la régénération des coupes rases en Wallonie. Forêt. Nature 141 (2016), 46–51.
Le Moguédec, G., Dhôte, J.F., Fagacées: a tree-centered growth and yield model for sessile oak (Quercus petraea L.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann. For. Sci. 69 (2012), 257–269.
Ledermann, T., Description of PrognAus for Windows 2.2. Hasenauer, H, (eds.) Sustainable Forest Management – Growth Models for Europe, 2006, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 71–78.
Lumley, T., Scott, A., Fitting regression models to survey data. Stat. Sci. 32 (2017), 265–278.
MacDicken, K.G., Global Forest resources assessment 2015: what, why and how. For. Ecol. Manage. 352 (2015), 3–8.
Mina, M., Bugmann, H., Klopcic, M., Cailleret, M., Accurate modeling of harvesting is key for projecting future forest dynamics: a case study in the Slovenian mountains. Reg. Environ. Change 17 (2017), 49–64, 10.1007/s10113-015-0902-2.
Monserud, R.A., Sterba, H., A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria. For. Ecol. Manage. 80 (1996), 57–80.
Muys, B., Hynynen, J., Palahi, M., Lexer, M.J., Fabrika, M., Pretzsch, H., Gillet, F., Briceño, E., Nabuurs, G.J., Kint, V., Simulation tools for decision support to adaptive forest management in Europe. For. Syst. 19 (2010), 86–99.
Nabuurs, G.J., Schelhaas, M.-.J., Pussinen, A., Validation of the European Forest Information Scenario Model (EFISCEN) and a projection of Finnish forests. Silva Fennica 34:2 (2000), 167–179.
Pauwels, D., Lejeune, P., Rondeux, J., A decision support system to simulate and compare silvicultural scenarios for pure even-aged larch stands. Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007), 345–353.
Perin, J., Claessens, H., Lejeune, P., Brostaux, Y., Hébert, J., Distance-independent tree basal area growth models for Norway spruce, Douglas-fir and Japanese larch in Southern Belgium. Eur. J. For. Res. 136:2 (2016), 193–204.
Perin, J., De Thier, O., Claessens, H., Lejeune, P., Hébert, J., Nouvelles courbes de productivité harmonisées pour le douglas l'épicéa et les mélèzes en Wallonie. Forêt Wallonne 129 (2014), 26–41.
Petritsch, R., Hasenauer, H., Pietsch, S.A., Incorporating forest growth response to thinning within biome-BGC. For. Ecol. Manage. 242:2–3 (2007), 324–336.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., Core Team, R., _nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3 (2019), 1–140 URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme>.
Pommerening, A., Murphy, S.T., A review of the history, definitions and methods of continuous cover forestry with special attention to afforestation and restocking. Forestry 77:1 (2004), 27–44.
A.́, Porté, H., Bartelink H., Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. Ecol. Modell. 150 (2002), 141–188.
Pretzsch, H., Application and evaluation of the growth simulator SILVA 2.2 for forest stands, forest estates and large regions. Forstw. Cbl. 121 (2002), 28–51.
Pretzsch, H., Forrester, D.I., Rötzer, T., Representation of species mixing in forest growth models. A review and perspective. Ecol. Modell. 313 (2015), 276–292.
Pretzsch, H., Grote, R., Reineking, B., Rötzer, T.H., Seifert, S.T., Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. Ann. Bot. 101:8 (2007), 1065–1087.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2019, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Roberts, S.D., Harrington, C.A., Individual tree growth response to variable-density thinning in coastal Pacific Northwest forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 255:7 (2008), 2771–2781.
Rohner, B., Waldner, P., Lischke, H., et al. Predicting individual-tree growth of central European tree species as a function of site, stand, management, nutrient, and climate effects. Eur. J. Forest. Res. 137 (2017), 29–44.
Rondeux J., Sanchez C., Latte N. 2010. National forest inventories pathways for common reporting: belgium (Walloon Region). National Forest Inventories. Pathways for Common Reporting, 73–87.
Ruiz-Peinado, R., Bravo-Oviedo, A., López-Senespleda, E., Bravo, F., Río, M., Forest management and carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean region: a review. For. Syst., 26(2), 2017, eR04S https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2017262-11205.
Sallnas 0. 1990. A matrix growth model of the Swedish forest. Studia Forestalia Suecica 183. 23 pp. ISSN 0039-3 150. ISBN 9 1-576-4174-9.
Schmid, S., Thürig, E., Kaufmann, E., Lischke, H., Bugmann, H., Effect of forest management on future carbon pools and fluxes: a model comparison. For. Ecol. Manage. 237:1–3 (2006), 65–82.
Schütz, J.-.P., Ammann, P., Zingg, A., Optimizing the yield of Douglas-fir with an appropriate thinning regime. Eur. J. For. Res. 134 (2015), 469–480.
So, S., Why is the Sample Variance a Biased Estimator?. 2008, Griffith University Tech. Rep., 9. URL https://maxwell.ict.griffith.edu.au/sso/biased_variance.pdf.
Söderbergh, I., Ledermann, T., Algorithms for simulating thinning and harvesting in five European individual-tree growth simulators: a review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 39:2 (2003), 115–140.
Stadelmann, G., Temperli, C., Rohner, B., Didion, M., Herold, A., Rösler, E., Thürig, E, Presenting MASSIMO: a management scenario simulation model to project growth, harvests and carbon dynamics of swiss forests. Forests, 10, 2019, 94.
Sterba, H., Golser, M., Moser, M., Schadauer, K., A timber harvesting model for Austria. Comput. Electron. Agric. 28:2 (2000), 133–149.
Sterba, H., Ledermann, T., Inventory and modelling for forests in transition from even-aged to uneven-aged management. For. Ecol. Manage. 224:3 (2006), 278–285.
Taylor, A.R., Chen, H.Y., VanDamme, L., A review of forest succession models and their suitability for forest management planning. Forest Sci. 55:1 (2009), 23–36.
Thurnher, C., Klopf, M., Hasenauer, H., Forests in transition: a harvesting model for uneven-aged mixed species forests in Austria. Forestry 84:5 (2011), 517–526.
Twery, M.J., Weiskittel, A.R., Forest-management modelling. Wainwright, J., Mulligan, M., (eds.) Environmental Modelling: Finding Simplicity in Complexity, 2nd Edition, 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 379–397.
UNFCCC. 2020. Belgium's greenhouse gas inventory (1990-2018). URL: https://climat.be/doc/nir-15-april-2020-final.pdf.
Valsta, L., An optimization model for Norway spruce management based on individual-tree growth models. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 232, 1992, 19.
Vanclay J.K. 1994. Modelling forest growth and yield: applications to mixed tropical forests, CAB International, UK, 304 pp.
Vauhkonen, J., Packalen, T., A Markov chain model for simulating wood supply from any-aged forest management based on National Forest Inventory (NFI) Data. Forests, 8, 2017, 307.
Vauhkonen, J., Berger, A., Gschwantner, T., et al. Harmonised projections of future forest resources in Europe. Ann. For. Sci., 76, 2019, 79 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0863-6.
Vidal, C., Alberdi, I., Hernández, L., Redmond, J., National Forest Inventories – Assessment of Wood Availability and Use. 2016, Springer, 845.
Vidal, C., Lanz, A., Tomppo, E., Schadauer, K., Gschwantner, T., di Cosmo, L., Robert, N., Establishing forest inventory reference definitions for forest and growing stock: a study towards common reporting. Silva Fennica 42 (2008), 247–266.
