A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised

[en] Objective: The aim of the study was to check on the reliability and validity of the translated version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised. Design: Prospective psychometric study. Setting: Rehabilitation and neurology unit in hospital. Subjects: Patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Interventions: None. Main measures: The original English version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was translated into Chinese. The reliability and validity were undertaken by trained raters. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to investigate internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation was used to calculate concurrent validity. The Coma Recovery Scale–revised was used to assess the consciousness of patients. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Inter-rater reliability of the Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was high for total scores and motor and verbal subscores and good for facial subscores. Test–retest reliability was high for total score and for all subscores. Analysis revealed a moderate internal consistency for subscores. For the concurrent validity, a strong correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability behavioral scale for all patients. A moderate correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Coma Recovery Scale–revised scores for all patients. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised has good reliability and validity data for assessing responses to pain in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. © The Author(s) 2020.

Research center :

CHU de Liège-Centre du Cerveau² - ULiège

Disciplines :

Neurology

Author, co-author :

Wang, J.; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China, Chindee Brain Science Institutes, Shanghai, China

Di, H.; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

Hua, W.; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

Cheng, L.; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

Xia, Z.; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

Hu, Z.; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

Huang, W.; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

Chatelle, Camille ; GIGA, GIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group

Laureys, Steven ; Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA Consciousness-Coma Science Group

Language :

English

Title :

A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised

Publication date :

2020

Journal title :

Clinical Rehabilitation

ISSN :

0269-2155

eISSN :

1477-0873

Publisher :

SAGE Publications Ltd

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1112-1121

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

European Projects :

H2020 - 785907 - HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2

Funders :

NSCF - National Natural Science Foundation of China [CN]
EU - European Union [BE]
FRB - King Baudouin Foundation [BE]
CE - Commission Européenne [BE]

Funding text :

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 81920108023 and 81471100; Hanghzou Normal University under Grant 2018PYXML007; the College students in Zhejiang Province Science and Technology Innovation Activities plan under Grant 2017R423055; Zhejiang Basic Public Interest Research Program Project under Grant LGF20H090017; the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Program for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement (Human Brain Project SGA2, 785907), the fund Generet, the King Baudouin Foundation, and the DOCMA project under Grant EU-H2020-MSCA-RISE-778234.

Available on ORBi :

since 07 December 2020

Statistics

Number of views

173 (2 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

90 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

International Association for the Study of Pain. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms (Task Force on taxonomy of the International Association for the Study of Pain). Seattle, WA: IASP Press, 1994, pp.41–43.
Snow AL, O’Malley KJ, Cody M, et al. A conceptual model of pain assessment for noncommunicative persons with dementia. Gerontologist 2004; 44: 807–817.
Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, et al. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16: 258–265.
Snow AL, Weber JB, O’Malley KJ, et al. NOPPAIN: a nursing assistant-administered pain assessment instrument for use in dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004; 17: 240–246.
Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 2010; 8: 68.
Monti MM, Laureys S, Owen AM., The vegetative state. BMJ 2010; 341: c3765.
Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1499–1508.
Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58: 349–353.
Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Demertzi A, et al. What about pain in disorders of consciousness? AAPS J 2012; 14: 437–444.
Boly M, Faymonville ME, Schnakers C, et al. Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 1013–1020.
Chatelle C, Majerus S, Whyte J, et al. A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012; 83: 1233–1237.
Schnakers C, Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. The Nociception Coma Scale: a new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain 2010; 148: 215–219.
Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J., The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 2020–2029.
Zhang Y, Wang J, Schnakers C, et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj 2019; 33: 529–533.
Kalmar K, Giacino JT., The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005; 15: 454–460.
Di H, He M, Zhang Y, et al. Chinese translation of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. Brain Inj 2017; 31: 363–365.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL., Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–428.
Lexell JE, Downham DY., How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 719–723.
Cronbach LJ., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.
Wieland A, Durach CF, Kembro J, et al. Statistical and judgmental criteria for scale purification. Supply Chain Manage 2017; 22: 321–328.
Cortina JM., What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 1993; 78: 98–104.
Devellis RF., Scale development: theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1991.
Vink P, Eskes AM, Lindeboom R, et al. Nurses assessing pain with the Nociception Coma Scale: interrater reliability and validity. Pain Manag Nurs 2014; 15: 881–887.
Riganello F, Cortese MD, Arcuri F, et al. A study of the reliability of the Nociception Coma Scale. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29: 388–393.
Sattin D, Schnakers C, Pagani M, et al. Evidence of altered pressure pain thresholds in persons with disorders of consciousness as measured by the Nociception Coma Scale-Italian version. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2018; 28: 1295–1310.
Voepel-Lewis T, Zanotti J, Dammeyer JA, et al. Reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care 2010; 19: 55–61.
Formisano R, Contrada M, Aloisi M, et al. Nociception Coma Scale with personalized painful stimulation versus standard stimulus in non-communicative patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil. Epub ahead of print 15 May 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1614464.
Chatelle C, Hauger SL, Martial C, et al. Assessment of nociception and pain in participants in an unresponsive or minimally conscious state after acquired brain injury: the relation between the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised and the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: 1755–1762.
Chatelle C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Majerus S, et al. The Nociception Coma Scale: a sensitive scale to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. J Neurol 2010; 257: S83.