Article (Scientific journals)
A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised
Wang, J.; Di, H.; Hua, W. et al.
2020In Clinical Rehabilitation, 34 (8), p. 1112-1121
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised.doc
Author postprint (621.06 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Nociception; prolonged disorders of consciousness; pain; minimally conscious state,; Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome
Abstract :
[en] Objective: The aim of the study was to check on the reliability and validity of the translated version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised. Design: Prospective psychometric study. Setting: Rehabilitation and neurology unit in hospital. Subjects: Patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Interventions: None. Main measures: The original English version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was translated into Chinese. The reliability and validity were undertaken by trained raters. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to investigate internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation was used to calculate concurrent validity. The Coma Recovery Scale–revised was used to assess the consciousness of patients. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Inter-rater reliability of the Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was high for total scores and motor and verbal subscores and good for facial subscores. Test–retest reliability was high for total score and for all subscores. Analysis revealed a moderate internal consistency for subscores. For the concurrent validity, a strong correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability behavioral scale for all patients. A moderate correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Coma Recovery Scale–revised scores for all patients. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised has good reliability and validity data for assessing responses to pain in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. © The Author(s) 2020.
Research center :
CHU de Liège-Centre du Cerveau² - ULiège
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
Wang, J.;  International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China, Chindee Brain Science Institutes, Shanghai, China
Di, H.;  International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Hua, W.;  International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Cheng, L.;  International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Xia, Z.;  International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Hu, Z.;  International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Huang, W.;  International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Chatelle, Camille ;  GIGA, GIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group
Laureys, Steven  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA Consciousness-Coma Science Group
Language :
English
Title :
A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised
Publication date :
2020
Journal title :
Clinical Rehabilitation
ISSN :
0269-2155
eISSN :
1477-0873
Publisher :
SAGE Publications Ltd
Volume :
34
Issue :
8
Pages :
1112-1121
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
European Projects :
H2020 - 785907 - HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2
Funders :
NSCF - National Natural Science Foundation of China [CN]
EU - European Union [BE]
FRB - King Baudouin Foundation [BE]
CE - Commission Européenne [BE]
Funding text :
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 81920108023 and 81471100; Hanghzou Normal University under Grant 2018PYXML007; the College students in Zhejiang Province Science and Technology Innovation Activities plan under Grant 2017R423055; Zhejiang Basic Public Interest Research Program Project under Grant LGF20H090017; the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Program for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement (Human Brain Project SGA2, 785907), the fund Generet, the King Baudouin Foundation, and the DOCMA project under Grant EU-H2020-MSCA-RISE-778234.
Available on ORBi :
since 07 December 2020

Statistics


Number of views
169 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
88 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi