Reference : An evaluation of inbreeding measures using a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.
Scientific journals : Article
Life sciences : Genetics & genetic processes
Life sciences : Animal production & animal husbandry
An evaluation of inbreeding measures using a whole-genome sequenced cattle pedigree.
Alemu, Setegn Worku [> >]
Kadri, Naveen Kumar [> >]
Harland, Chad [> >]
Faux, Pierre [> >]
Charlier, Carole mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > > Medical Genomics-Unit of Animal Genomics >]
Caballero, Armando [> >]
Druet, Tom mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > > Medical Genomics-Unit of Animal Genomics >]
Yes (verified by ORBi)
[en] The estimation of the inbreeding coefficient (F) is essential for the study of inbreeding depression (ID) or for the management of populations under conservation. Several methods have been proposed to estimate the realized F using genetic markers, but it remains unclear which one should be used. Here we used whole-genome sequence data for 245 individuals from a Holstein cattle pedigree to empirically evaluate which estimators best capture homozygosity at variants causing ID, such as rare deleterious alleles or loci presenting heterozygote advantage and segregating at intermediate frequency. Estimators relying on the correlation between uniting gametes (F(UNI)) or on the genomic relationships (F(GRM)) presented the highest correlations with these variants. However, homozygosity at rare alleles remained poorly captured. A second group of estimators relying on excess homozygosity (F(HOM)), homozygous-by-descent segments (F(HBD)), runs-of-homozygosity (F(ROH)) or on the known genealogy (F(PED)) was better at capturing whole-genome homozygosity, reflecting the consequences of inbreeding on all variants, and for young alleles with low to moderate frequencies (0.10 < . < 0.25). The results indicate that F(UNI) and F(GRM) might present a stronger association with ID. However, the situation might be different when recessive deleterious alleles reach higher frequencies, such as in populations with a small effective population size. For locus-specific inbreeding measures or at low marker density, the ranking of the methods can also change as F(HBD) makes better use of the information from neighboring markers. Finally, we confirmed that genomic measures are in general superior to pedigree-based estimates. In particular, F(PED) was uncorrelated with locus-specific homozygosity.
CECI - Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif ; Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - F.R.S.-FNRS

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

Open access
Alemu_et_al-2020-Heredity.pdfPublisher postprint876.66 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.