[en] Milk production data of Luxembourg and Tunisian Holstein cows were analyzed using herd management (HM) level. Herds in each country were clustered into high, medium, and low HM levels based on solutions of herd-test-date and herd-year of calving effects from national evaluations. Data from both populations included 730,810 test-day (TD) milk yield records from 87,734 first-lactation cows. A multi-trait, random regression TD model was used to estimate (co)variance components for milk yield within and across country HM levels. Additive genetic and permanent environmental variances of TD milk yields varied with management level in Tunisia and Luxembourg. Additive variances were smaller across HM levels in Tunisia than in Luxembourg, whereas permanent environmental variances were larger in Tunisian HM levels. Highest heritability estimates of 305-d milk yield (0.41 and 0.21) were found in high HM levels, whereas lowest estimates (0.31 and 0.12, respectively) were associated with low HM levels in both countries. Genetic correlations among Luxembourg HM levels were >0.96, whereas those among Tunisian HM levels were below 0.80. Respective rank orders of sires ranged from 0.73 to 0.83 across Luxembourg environments and from 0.33 to 0.42 across Tunisian HM levels indicating high re-ranking of sires in Tunisia and only a scaling effect in Luxembourg. Across-country environment analysis showed that estimates of genetic variance in the high, medium, and low classes of Tunisian environments were 45, 69, and 81% lower, respectively, than the estimate found in the high Luxembourg HM level. Genetic correlations among 305-d milk yields in Tunisian and Luxembourg HM environments ranged from 0.39 to 0.79. The largest estimated genetic correlation was found between the medium Luxembourg and high Tunisian HM levels. Rank correlations for common sires' estimated breeding values among HM environments were low and ranged from 0.19 to 0.39, implying the existence of genotype by environment interaction. These results indicate that daughters of superior sires in Luxembourg have their genetic expression for milk production limited under Tunisian environments. Milk production of cows in the medium and low Luxembourg environments were good predictors of that of their paternal half-sisters in the high Tunisian HM level. Breeding decisions in low-input Tunisian environment should utilize semen from sires with daughters in similar production environments rather than semen of bulls proven in higher management levels.
Beerda, B., W. Ouweltjes, L. B. J. Sebek, J. J. Windig, and R. F. Veerkamp. 2007. Effects of genotype by environment interactions on milk yield, energy balance, and protein balance. J. Dairy Sci. 90:219-228.
Berry, D. P., F. Buckley, P. Dillon, R. D. Evans, M. Rath, and R. F. Veerkamp. 2003. Estimation of genotype×environment interactions, in a grass-based system, for milk yield, body condition score, and body weight using random regression models. Livest. Prod. Sci. 80:191-203.
Boettcher, P. J., J. Fatehi, and M. M. Schutz. 2003. Genotype × environment interactions in conventional versus pasture-based dairies in Canada. J. Dairy Sci. 86:383-404.
Boldman, K. G., and A. E. Freeman. 1990. Adjustment for heterogeneity of variances by herd level in dairy cow and sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 73:503-512.
Calus, M. P. L., A. F. Groen, and G. de Jong. 2002. Genotype × environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3115-3123.
Calus, M. P. L., and R. F. Veerkamp. 2003. Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3756-3764.
Carabaño, M. J., L. D. Van Vleck, G. R. Wiggans, and R. Alenda. 1989. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk and fat yields of dairy cattle in Spain and the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 72:3013-3022.
Carabaño, M. J., K. M. Wade, and L. D. Van Vleck. 1990. Genotype by environment interactions for milk and fat production across regions of the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 73:173-180.
Castillo-Juarez, H., P. A. Oltenacu, R. W. Blake, C. E. Mcculloch, and E. G. Cienfuegos-Rivas. 2000. Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 83:807-814.
Cerón-Muñoz, M. F., H. Tonhati, C. N. Costa, D. Rojas-Sarmiento, and D. M. Echeverri. 2004. Factors that cause genotype by environment interaction and use of a multiple-trait herd-cluster model for milk yield of Holstein cattle from Brazil and Colombia. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2687-2692.
Cienfuegos-Rivas, E. G., P. A. Oltenacu, R. W. Blake, S. J. Schwager, H. Castillo-Juarez, and F. J. Ruiz. 1999. Interaction between milk yield of Holstein cows in Mexico and the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2218-2223.
Costa, C. N., R. W. Blake, E. J. Pollak, P. A. Oltenacu, R. L. Quaas, and S. R. Searle. 2000. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2963-2974.
Cromie, A. R., D. L. Kelleher, F. J. Gordon, and M. Rath. 1998. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle in Ireland. Interbull Bull. 18:100-104.
Fahey, A. G., M. M. Schutz, D. L. Lofgren, A. P. Schinckel, and T. S. Stewart. 2007. Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity. J. Dairy Sci. 90:3889-3899.
Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. MacKay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th ed. Longman Group, Essex, UK.
Fikse, W. F. 2004. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2709-2719.
Fikse, W. F., R. Rekaya, and K. A. Weigel. 2003a. Genotype × environment interaction for milk production in Guernsey cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1821-1827.
Fikse, W. F., R. Rekaya, and K. A. Weigel. 2003b. Assessment of environmental descriptors for studying genotype by environment interaction. Livest. Prod. Sci. 82:223-231.
Gernand, E., R. Waßmuth, U. U. von Borstel, and S. König. 2007. Heterogeneity of variance components for production traits in large-scale dairy farms. Livest. Prod. Sci. 112:78-89.
Hammami, H., B. Rekik, H. Soyeurt, C. Bastin, J. Stoll, and N. Gengler. 2008. Genotype × environment interaction for milk yield in Holsteins using Luxembourg and Tunisian populations. J. Dairy Sci. 91:3661-3671.
Haskell, M. J., S. Brotherstone, A. B. Lawrence, and I. M. S. White. 2007. Characterization of the dairy farm environment in Great Britain and the effect of the farm environment on cow life span. J. Dairy Sci. 90:5316-5323.
Hayes, B. J., M. Carrick, P. Bowman, and M. E. Goddard. 2003. Genotype × environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3736-3744.
Hill, W. G. 1984. On selection among groups with heterogeneous variance. Anim. Prod. 39:473-477.
Hill, W. G., M. R. Edwards, M. K. A. Ahmed, and R. Thompson. 1983. Heritability of milk yield and composition at different levels and variability of production. Anim. Prod. 36:59-68.
Kearney, J. F., M. M. Schutz, P. J. Boettcher, and K. A. Weigel. 2004. Genotype × environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits. J. Dairy Sci. 87:501-509.
Kolmodin, R., E. Strandberg, P. Madsen, J. Jensen, and H. Jorjani. 2002. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied by use of reaction norms. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 52:11-24.
Kolver, E. S., J. R. Roche, M. J. de Veth, P. L. Thorne, and A. R. Napper. 2002. Total mixed rations versus pasture diets: Evidence for a genotype × diet interaction in dairy cow performance. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 62:246-251.
König, S., I. Raeder, G. Dietl, and H. H. Swalve. 2005. Genetic relationships for dairy performance between large-scale and small-scale farm conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 88:4087-4096.
Lynch, M., and J. B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
Misztal, I., S. Tsuruta, T. Strabel, B. Auvray, T. Druet, and D. H. Lee. 2002. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France. CD-ROM communication 28:07.
Mulder, H. A., R. F. Veerkamp, B. J. Ducro, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and P. Bijma. 2006. Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for different environments with genotype by environment interaction. J. Dairy. Sci. 89:1740-1752.
Ojango, J. M. K., and G. E. Pollot. 2002. The relationship between Holstein bull breeding values for milk yield derived in both the UK and Kenya. Livest. Prod. Sci. 74:1-12.
Raffrenato, E., R. W. Blake, P. A. Oltenacu, J. Carvalheira, and G. Licitra. 2003. Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2470-2479.
Rekaya, R., K. A. Weigel, and D. Gianola. 2001. Application of a structural model for genetic covariances in international dairy sire evaluations. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1525-1530.
Rekik, B., A. Ben Gara, M. Ben Hammouda, and H. Hammami. 2003. Fitting lactation curves of dairy cattle in different types of herds in Tunisia. Livest. Prod. Sci. 83:309-315.
Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15:469-485.
SAS Institute. 2002. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 9.1.3 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Schaeffer, L. R. 1994. Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2671-2678.
Stanton, T. L., R. W. Blake, R. L. Quaas, L. D. Van Vleck, and M. J. Carabaño. 1991. Genotype by environment interaction for Holstein milk yield in Colombia, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1700-1714.
van Arendonk, J. A., and A. E. Liinamo. 2003. Dairy cattle production in Europe. Theriogenology 59:563-569.
Vargas, B., and J. A. M. van Arendonk. 2004. Genetic comparison of breeding schemes based on semen importation and local breeding schemes: Framework and application to Costa Rica. J. Dairy Sci. 87:1496-1505.
Veerkamp, R. F., G. Simm, and J. D. Oldham. 1995. Genotype by environment interactions: Experience from Langhill. In Breeding and Feeding the High Genetic Merit Dairy Cow. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Occ. Publ. 19:59-66.
Verdugo, R. A., A. A. Jara, R. W. Everett, and N. R. Barría Pérez. 2004. Selection response of US Holstein AI bulls for milk production in Chile and Argentina. Livest. Prod. Sci. 88:9-16.
Vinson, W. E. 1987. Potential biases in genetic evaluations from differences in variation within herds. J. Dairy Sci. 70:2450-2455.
Weigel, K. A., and R. Rekaya. 2000. A multiple-trait herd cluster model for international dairy sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 83:815-821.
Zwald, N. R., K. A. Weigel, W. F. Fikse, and R. Rekaya. 2003. Application of a multiple-trait herd cluster model for genetic evaluation of dairy sires from seventeen countries. J. Dairy Sci. 86:376-382.