Genetic correlation; Genotype by environment interaction; random regression; rank correlation
Abstract :
[en] First-lactation test-day (TD) milk records of Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins were analysed for evidence of genotype by environment interaction (G · E). The joint data included 730 810 TD records of 87 734 cows and 231 common sires. Random regression TD sire models with fourth-order Legendre polynomials were used to estimate genetic parameters via within- and across-country analyses. Daily heritability estimates of milk yield from within-country analysis were between 0.11 and 0.32, and 0.03 and 0.13 in Luxembourg and Tunisia, respectively. Heritability estimates for 305-day milk yield and persistency (defined as the breeding value for milk yield on DIM 280 minus the breeding value on DIM 80) were lower for Tunisian Holsteins compared with the Luxembourg population. Specifically, heritability for 305-day milk yield was 0.16 for within- and 0.11 for across-country analyses for Tunisian Holsteins and 0.38 for within- and 0.40 for across-country analyses for Luxembourg Holsteins. Heritability for apparent persistency was 0.02 for both within and across-country analyses for Tunisian Holsteins and 0.08 for within and 0.09 for across-country analyses for Luxembourg Holsteins. Genetic correlations between the two countries were 0.50 for 305-day milk yield and 0.43 for apparent persistency. Moreover, rank correlations between the estimated breeding values of common sires for 305-day milk yield and persistency, estimated separately in each country, were low. Low genetic correlations are evidence for G · E for milk yield production while low rank correlations suggest different rankings of sires in both environments. Results from this study indicate that milk production of daughters of the same sires depends greatly on the production environment
and that importing high merit semen for limited input systems might not be an effective strategy to improve milk production.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry Genetics & genetic processes
Banos G., Smith C. (1991) Selecting bulls across countries to maximize genetic improvement in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 108, 174 181.
Boettcher P.J., Fatehi J., Schutz M.M. (2003) Genotype x environenment interactions in conventional versus pasture-based dairies in Canada. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 383 404.
Bytyqi H., Ødegörd J., Mehmeti H., Vegara M., Klemetsdal G. (2007) Environmental sensitivity of milk production in extensive environments: A comparison of Simmental, Brown Swiss, and Tyrol Grey using random regression models. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 3883 3888.
Calus M.P.L., Veerkamp R.F. (2003) Estimation of environmental sensitivity of genetic merit for milk production traits using a random regression model. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 3756 3764.
Carabaño M.J., Van Vleck L.D., Wiggans G.R. (1989) Estimation of genetic parameters for milk and fat yields of dairy cattle in Spain and the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 72, 3013 3022.
Castillo-Juarez H., Oltenacu P.A., Blake R.W., McCulloch C.E., Cienfuegos-Rivas E.G. (2000) Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 807 814.
Cerón-Muñoz M.F., Tonhati H., Costa C.N., Rojas-Sarmiento D., Echeverri D.M. (2004) Factors that cause genotype by environment interaction and use of a multiple-trait herd-cluster model for milk yield of Holstein cattle from Brazil and Colombia. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 2687 2692.
Charagu P., Peterson R. (1998) Estimates of G × E effects for economic efficiency among daughters of Canadian and New Zealand sires in Canadian and New Zealand dairy herds. Interbull. Bull., 17, 105 109.
Cienfuegos-Rivas E.G., Oltenacu P.A., Blake R.W., Schwager S.J., Castillo-Juarez H., Ruiz F.J. (1999) Interaction between milk yield of Holstein cows in Mexico and the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 82, 2218 2223.
Costa C.N., Blake R.W., Pollak E.J., Oltenacu P.A., Quaas R.L., Searle S.R. (2000) Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 2963 2974.
Fikse W.F., Rekaya R., Weigel K.A. (2003) Assessment of environmental descriptors for studying genotype by environment interaction. Livest. Prod. Sci., 82, 223 231.
Gengler N. (1996) Persistency of lactation yields: A review. Interbull. Bull., 12, 87 96.
Hammami H., Croquet C., Stoll J., Rekik B., Gengler N. (2007) Genetic diversity and joint-pedigree analysis of two importing Holstein populations. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 3530 3541.
Hammami H., Rekik B., Soyeurt H., Ben Gara A., Gengler N. (2008) Genetic parameters of Tunisian Holsteins using a test-day random regression model. J. Dairy Sci., 91, 2118 2126.
Hayes B.J., Carrick M., Bowman P., Goddard M.E. (2003) Genotype × environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 3736 3744.
Jakobsen J.H., Madsen P., Jensen J., Pedersen J., Christensen L.G., Sorensen D. (2002) Genetic parameters for milk production and persistency for Danish Holsteins estimated in random regression models using REML. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 1607 1616.
Jamrozik J., Jansen G., Schaeffer L.R., Liu Z. (1998) Analysis of persistency of lactation calculated from a random regression test day model. Interbull. Bull., 16, 43 47.
Jamrozik J., Schaeffer L.R., Weigel K.A. (2002a) Estimates of genetic parameters for single- and multiple-country test-day models. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 3131 3141. (Pubitemid 38571438)
Jamrozik J., Schaeffer L.R., Weigel K.A. (2002b) Genetic evaluation of bulls and cows with single- and multiple-country test-day models. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 1617 1622. (Pubitemid 38572222)
Kearney J.F., Schutz M.M., Boettcher P.J. (2004) Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement: I. Production traits. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 501 509.
Miglior F., Muir B.L., Van Doormaal B.J. (2005) Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 1255 1263.
Misztal I., Tsuruta S., Strabel T., Auvray B., Druet T., Lee D.H. (2002) BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In : Proceedings of 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France. CD-ROM communication 28:07.
Muir B.L., Kistemaker G., Jamrozik J., Canavesci F. (2007) Genetic parameters for a multiple-trait multiple-lactation random regression test-day model in Italian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 1564 1574.
Ojango J.M.K., Pollot G.E. (2002) The relationship between Holstein bull breeding values for milk yield derived in both the UK and Kenya. Livest. Prod. Sci., 74, 1 12.
Powell R.L., VanRaden P.M. (2002) International dairy bull evaluations expressed on national, subglobal, and global scales. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 1863 1868.
Raffrenato E., Blake R.W., Oltenacu P.A., Carvalheiro J., Licitra G. (2003) Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 2470 2479.
Rekaya R., Weigel K.A., Gianola D. (2001) Application of a structural model for genetic covariances in international dairy sire evaluations. J. Dairy Sci., 84, 1525 1530.
SAS 2002) SAS User's Guide: Statistics Version 9.1.3 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Sigurdsson A., Banos G., Philipsson J. (1996) Estimation of genetic (co)variance components for international evaluation of dairy bulls. Acta Agric. Scand., 46, 129 136.
Stanton T.L., Blake R.W., Quaas R.L., Van Vleck L.D., Carabaño M.J. (1991) Genotype by environment interaction for Holstein milk yield in Colombia, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 1700 1714.
Swalve H.H., Gengler N. (1999) Genetics of lactation persistency. Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci., 24, 75 82.
Tijani A., Wiggans G.R., Tassel C.P., Philpot J.C., Gengler N. (1999) Use of (co)variance functions to describe (co)variances for test-day yield. J. Dairy Sci., 82, 226.
Togashi K., Lin C.Y. (2004) Efficiency of different selection criteria for persistency and lactation milk yield. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 1528 1535.
Weigel K.A., Rekaya R. (2000) A multiple-trait herd cluster model for international dairy sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 815 821.
Weigel K.A., Rekaya R., Zwald N.R., Fikse W.F. (2001) International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using a multiple-trait model with individual animal performance records. J. Dairy Sci., 84, 2789 2795.
Wiggans G.R., Van Vleck L.D. (1978) Evaluation of sires in herds feeding differing proportions of concentrates and roughages. J. Dairy Sci., 61, 246 249.
Zwald N.R., Weigel K.A., Fikse W.F., Rekaya R. (2001) Characterization of dairy production systems in countries that participate in the international bull evaluation service. J. Dairy Sci., 84, 2530 2534.
Zwald N.R., Weigel K.A., Fikse W.F., Rekaya R. (2003) Identification of factors that cause genotype by environment interaction between herds of Holstein cattle in seventeen countries. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 1009 1018.