Abstract :
[en] It is commonly assumed that Adolf Reinach (although he never applied the word to himself in his published work) was a full-fledged realist. The aim of this paper is to clarify in what sense Reinach can be called a “realist.” I identify two distinct realisms in Reinach. First, Reinach advocates a metaphysical realism. He defines logic as an ontology of mind-independent states of affaires and seeks to build up a Meinong-style theory of object based on a non-Husserlian understanding of Husserl’s intuition of essences. Second, Reinach also defends an epistemological realism according to which the burden of proof weights not on the realist, but on the idealist: “We have the right to believe in the outside world.”
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1