Article (Scientific journals)
What do models tell us about water and sediment connectivity?
Baartman, Jantienne; Nunes, Joao; Masselink, Rens et al.
2020In Geomorphology, 367
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
What-do-models-tell-us-about-water-and-sediment-connectivity2020Geomorphology.pdf
Publisher postprint (2.56 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
catchment; connectivity; erosion model; model comparison
Abstract :
[en] Connectivity has been embraced by the geosciences community as a useful concept to understand and describe hydrological functioning and sediment movement through catchments. Mathematical modelling has been used for decades to quantify and predict erosion and transport of sediments, e.g. in scenarios of land use change or conservation measures. Being intrigued by both models and the connectivity concept, as a group of modellers we aimed at investigating what different models could tell us about connectivity. Therefore, we evaluated the response of contrasted spatially-distributed models to landscape connectivity features and explained the differences based on different model structures. A total of 53 scenarios were built with varying field sizes and orientations, as well as the implementation of soil conservation measures. These scenarios were simulated, for two rainfall intensities, with five event- and process-based water and soil erosion models – EROSION3D, FullSWOF_2D, LandSoil, OpenLISEM and Watersed. Results showed that rainfall amount plays the most important role in determining relative export and connected area of runoff and sediment in all models, indicating that functional aspects of connectivity were more important than structural connectivity. As for the role of structural landscape elements, there was no overall agreement between models regarding the effects of field sizes, crop allocation pattern, and conservation practices; agreement was also low on the spatial patterns of connectivity. This overall disagreement between models was unexpected. The results of this exercise suggest that the correct parameterization of runoff and sediment production and of routing patterns may be an important issue. Thus, incorporating connectivity functions based on routing would help modelling forward. Our results also suggest that structural connectivity indices may not suffice to represent connectivity in this type of catchment (relatively simple and monotonous land cover), and functional connectivity indices should be applied.
Research center :
TERRA Research Centre - TERRA
Disciplines :
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Baartman, Jantienne;  Wageningen University an Research
Nunes, Joao;  Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
Masselink, Rens;  Wageningen University and Research
Darboux, Frederic;  Laboratoire Sols et Environnement (LSE), Vandoeouvre-les-Nancy, France
Bielders, Charles;  UCLouvain
Degré, Aurore  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes
Cantreul, Vincent ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes
Cerdan, Olivier;  BRGM
Grangeon, Thomas;  BRGM
Fiener, Peter;  Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
Wilken, Florian;  Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
Schindewolf, Marcus;  Thuringian State Institute of Agriculture, Jena, Germany
Wainwright, John;  Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
More authors (3 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
What do models tell us about water and sediment connectivity?
Publication date :
15 October 2020
Journal title :
Geomorphology
ISSN :
0169-555X
eISSN :
1872-695X
Publisher :
Elsevier, Netherlands
Volume :
367
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
This paper forms part of the activities of the EU-funded COST action “CONNECTEUR” (ES1306; http://connecteur.info )
Available on ORBi :
since 31 August 2020

Statistics


Number of views
69 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
2 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
46
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
35
OpenCitations
 
31

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi