ORBi: Detailled Reference

Article (Scientific journals)

Is least limiting water range a useful indicator of the impact of tillage management on maize yield?

Li, Shengping; Wu, Xueping; Liang, Guopeng et al.

2020 • In Soil and Tillage Research, 199

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/250432

DOI
10.1016/j.still.2020.104602

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Is-least-limiting-water-range-a-useful-indicator-of-the-impact-of-tillage-management-on-maize-yield2020Soil-and-Tillage-Research.pdf

Publisher postprint (3.7 MB)

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

conservation tillage; least limiting water range; soil physical properties; soil water availability; yield

Abstract :

[en] Tillage management is a key factor driving changes in soil physical properties (SPP) and crop yield around the world. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the relationships between SPP and crop yield. The dynamic of SPP during the growth period is also seldom taken into account to understand suitable soil physical environment for crop growth. Moreover, the crop growth process cannot be explained by an individual SPP substantially. The least limiting water range (LLWR), which integrates soil penetration resistance, air porosity, and soil water potential, may provide a better understanding of soil-crop relationship, especially in regions with limited precipitation. Our objective was to explain how dynamic SPP affected grain yield during the growth period. A long-term field experiment was established in 2003, with continuous spring maize, on sandy loam soil. Seasonal changes of SPP (i.e. bulk density, penetration resistance, porosity, mean weight diameter, LLWR, and plant available water) were determined under reduced tillage with residue incorporated (RT-RI), conventional tillage with residue removal (CT), and no-tillage with residue mulch (NT-RM). The results showed that these SPP were affected by both tillage management and growth stage. Bulk density, porosity, S index, and mean weight diameter were not effective indicators to explain the changes of grain yield under the three tillage managements. The range of LLWR was narrower than plant available water (PAW) during the growth period and more sensitive to assess soil water availability under RT-RI, CT, and NT-RM. NT-RM significantly increased the lower limit of LLWR, which made it more difficult for root water uptake. Hence, RT-RI presented higher corn yield compared to NT-RM, even if the water content remained lower. Redundancy analysis further indicated that maize yield was mainly driven by lower limit of LLWR and penetration resistance. Overall, LLWR was an aggregative indicator including not only soil penetration resistance but also air porosity and soil water potential, which can better explain the change of grain yield under the long-term tillage management in semi-arid region.

Research center :

TERRA Research Centre - TERRA

Disciplines :

Agriculture & agronomy

Author, co-author :

Li, Shengping ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech

Wu, Xueping; CAAS

Liang, Guopeng; CAAS

Gao, Lili; CAAS

Wang, Bisheng; CAAS

Lu, Jinjing ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Terra

Abdelrhman, Ahmed Ali; CAAS

Song, Xiaojun; CAAS

Zhang, Mengni ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Terra

Zheng, Fengjun; CAAS

Degré, Aurore ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes

Language :

English

Title :

Is least limiting water range a useful indicator of the impact of tillage management on maize yield?

Publication date :

May 2020

Journal title :

Soil and Tillage Research

ISSN :

0167-1987

eISSN :

1879-3444

Publisher :

Elsevier, Netherlands

Volume :

199

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China ( 2018YFE0112300 and 2018YFD0200408 ), Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution ( 1610132019033 ), Science and Technology Project ( 2015BAD22B03 ), and National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 51679243 and 31661143011 ). we wish to thank the editors and reviewers for their constructive comments.

Available on ORBi :

since 31 August 2020

Statistics

Number of views

95 (9 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

5 (4 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

28

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

22

OpenCitations

22

Bibliography

Afzalinia, S., Zabihi, J., Soil compaction variation during corn growing season under conservation tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 137 (2014), 1–6.
Alam, M.K., Salahin, N., Islam, S., Begum, R., Hasanuzzaman, M., Islam, M., Rahman, M., Patterns of change in soil organic matter, physical properties and crop productivity under tillage practices and cropping systems in Bangladesh. J. Agric. Sci. 155 (2017), 216–238.
Alliaume, F., Rossing, W.A.H., Tittonell, P., Dogliotti, S., Modelling soil tillage and mulching effects on soil water dynamics in raised-bed vegetable rotations. Eur. J. Agron. 82 (2017), 268–281.
Asgarzadeh, H., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Mahboubi, A.A., Nosrati, A., Dexter, A.R., Soil water availability for plants as quantified by conventional available water, least limiting water range and integral water capacity. Plant Soil 335 (2010), 229–244.
Asgarzadeh, H., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Dexter, A.R., Mahboubi, A.A., Neyshabouri, M.R., Determination of soil available water for plants: Consistency between laboratory and field measurements. Geoderma 226-227 (2014), 8–20.
Bengough, A.G., Mullins, C.E., Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. J. Soil Sci. 41 (1990), 341–358.
Benjamin, J.G., Nielsen, D.C., Vigil, M.F., Quantifying effects of soil conditions on plant growth and crop production. Geoderma 116 (2003), 137–148.
Biazin, B., Stroosnijder, L., Temesgen, M., AbdulKedir, A., Sterk, G., The effect of long-term Maresha ploughing on soil physical properties in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Soil Tillage Res. 111 (2011), 115–122.
Blanco-Canqui, H., Ruis, S.J., No-tillage and soil physical environment. Geoderma 326 (2018), 164–200.
Brouder, S.M., Gomez-Macpherson, H.J., The impact of conservation agriculture on smallholder agricultural yields: a scoping review of the evidence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 187 (2014), 11–32.
Büchi, L., Wendling, M., Amossé, C., Necpalova, M., Charles, R., Importance of cover crops in alleviating negative effects of reduced soil tillage and promoting soil fertility in a winter wheat cropping system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 256 (2018), 92–104.
Cambardella, C., Elliott, E., Methods for physical separation and characterization of soil organic matter fractions. Soil Structure/Soil Biota Interrelationships, 1993, Elsevier, 449–457.
Cecagno, D., de Andrade Costa, S.E.V.G., Anghinoni, I., Kunrath, T.R., Martins, A.P., Reichert, J.M., Gubiani, P.I., Balerini, F., Fink, J.R., de Faccio Carvalho, P.C., Least limiting water range and soybean yield in a long-term, no-till, integrated crop-livestock system under different grazing intensities. Soil Tillage Res. 156 (2016), 54–62.
Connor, D.J., Mínguez, M.I., Evolution not revolution of farming systems will best feed and green the world. Glob. Food Sec. 1 (2012), 106–113.
De Lima, C.L.R., Miola, E.C.C., Timm, L.C., Pauletto, E.A., da Silva, A.P., Soil compressibility and least limiting water range of a constructed soil under cover crops after coal mining in Southern Brazil. Soil Tillage Res. 124 (2012), 190–195.
Destain, M.F., Roisin, C., Dalcq, A.S., Mercatoris, B.C.N., Effect of wheel traffic on the physical properties of a Luvisol. Geoderma 262 (2016), 276–284.
Dexter, A.R., Soil physical quality: part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120 (2004), 201–214.
Drewry, J., Paton, R.J., Soil physical quality under cattle grazing of a winter-fed brassica crop. Soil Res. 43 (2005), 525–531.
Drewry, J., Cameron, K., Buchan, G.D., Effect of simulated dairy cow treading on soil physical properties and ryegrass pasture yield. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 44 (2001), 181–190.
Filho, O.G., Blanco-Canqui, H., da Silva, A.P., Least limiting water range of the soil seedbed for long-term tillage and cropping systems in the central Great Plains. USA. Geoderma 207-208 (2013), 99–110.
Gao, L., Wang, B., Li, S., Wu, H., Wu, X., Liang, G., Gong, D., Zhang, X., Cai, D., Degré, A., Soil wet aggregate distribution and pore size distribution under different tillage systems after 16 years in the Loess Plateau of China. Catena 173 (2019), 38–47.
Giller, K.E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., Tittonell, P., Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view. Field Crops Res. 114 (2009), 23–34.
Godfray, H.C.J., Garnett, T., Food security and sustainable intensification. Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci., 369, 2014, 1639.
Guedes Filho, O., da Silva, A., Giarola, N., Tormena, C., Least-limiting water range of the soil seedbed submitted to mechanical and biological chiselling under no-till. Soil Res. 52 (2014), 521–532.
Hobbs, P.R., Sayre, K., Gupta, R., The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. 363 (2007), 543–555.
Jabro, J.D., Iversen, W.M., Stevens, W.B., Evans, R.G., Mikha, M.M., Allen, B.L., Physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil under zero, shallow and deep tillage practices. Soil Tillage Res. 159 (2016), 67–72.
Kadžienė, G., Munkholm, L.J., Mutegi, J.K., Root growth conditions in the topsoil as affected by tillage intensity. Geoderma 166 (2011), 66–73.
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R., Lahmar, R., Mrabet, R., Basch, G., Gonzalez-Sanchez, E.J., Serraj, R., Conservation agriculture in the dry Mediterranean climate. Fileld Crops Res. 132 (2012), 7–17.
Klute, A., Methods of soil analysis, part 1 physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy, 1986, 9.
Lal, R., Shukla, M.K., Principles of Soil Physics. 2004, CRC Press.
Lampurlanés, J., Plaza-Bonilla, D., Álvaro-Fuentes, J., Cantero-Martínez, C., Long-term analysis of soil water conservation and crop yield under different tillage systems in Mediterranean rainfed conditions. Field Crops Res. 189 (2016), 59–67.
Lapen, D., Topp, G., Gregorich, E., Curnoe, W.J.S., Research, T., Least limiting water range indicators of soil quality and corn production, eastern Ontario. Canada 78 (2004), 151–170.
Letey, J., Relationship between soil physical properties and crop production. Advances soil science, 1985, 277–294.
Logsdon, S.D., Karlen, D.L., Bulk density as a soil quality indicator during conversion to no-tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 78 (2004), 143–149.
Matamala, R., Calderón, F.J., Jastrow, J.D., Fan, Z., Hofmann, S.M., Michaelson, G.J., Mishra, U., Ping, C.L., Influence of site and soil properties on the DRIFT spectra of northern cold-region soils. Geoderma 305 (2017), 80–91.
Mielke, L., Powers, W., Badri, S., Estimating soil water content from soil strength. Soil Tillage Res. 31 (1994), 199–209.
Moreira, W.H., Tormena, C.A., Karlen, D.L., Silva, Á., Keller, T., Betioli, E., Seasonal changes in soil physical properties under long-term no-tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 160 (2016), 53–64.
Nielsen, D.C., Vigil, M.F., Benjamin, J.G., The variable response of dryland corn yield to soil water content at planting. Agric. Water Manag. 96 (2009), 330–336.
Nielsen, D.C., Halvorson, A.D., Vigil, M.F., Critical precipitation period for dryland maize production. Field Crops Res. 118 (2010), 259–263.
Paradelo, R., van Oort, F., Barré, P., Billiou, D., Chenu, C., Soil organic matter stabilization at the pluri-decadal scale: insight from bare fallow soils with contrasting physicochemical properties and macrostructures. Geoderma 275 (2016), 48–54.
Pittelkow, C.M., Liang, X., Linquist, B.A., van Groenigen, K.J., Lee, J., Lundy, M.E., van Gestel, N., Six, J., Venterea, R.T., van Kessel, C., Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517 (2015), 365–368.
Reatto, A., da Silva, E.M., Bruand, A., Martins, E.S., Lima, J.E.F.W., Validity of the centrifuge method for determining the water retention properties of tropical soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2008, 72.
Reynolds, W., Drury, C., Yang, X., Fox, C., Tan, C., Zhang, T.J., Land management effects on the near-surface physical quality of a clay loam soil. Soil Tillage Res. 96 (2007), 316–330.
Reynolds, W., Drury, C., Yang, X., Tan, C.J., Optimal soil physical quality inferred through structural regression and parameter interactions. Geoderma 146 (2008), 466–474.
Ruiz, S., Straub, I., Schymanski, S.J., Or, D., Experimental evaluation of earthworm and plant root soil penetration–Cavity expansion models using cone penetrometer analogs. Vadose Zone J., 2016, 15.
Salem, H.M., Valero, C., Muñoz, M.Á., Rodríguez, M.G., Silva, L.L., Short-term effects of four tillage practices on soil physical properties, soil water potential, and maize yield. Geoderma 237-238 (2015), 60–70.
Su, Z., Zhang, J., Wu, W., Cai, D., Lv, J., Jiang, G., Huang, J., Gao, J., Hartmann, R., Gabriels, D.J., Effects of conservation tillage practices on winter wheat water-use efficiency and crop yield on the Loess Plateau. China. Agric. Water Manage. 87 (2007), 307–314.
Tormena, C.A., Silva, Á., Imhoff, S.D.C., Dexter, A.R., Quantification of the soil physical quality of a tropical Oxisol using the S index. Sci. Agric. 65 (2008), 56–60.
Tormena, C.A., Karlen, D.L., Logsdon, S., Cherubin, M.R., Corn stover harvest and tillage impacts on near-surface soil physical quality. Soil Tillage Res. 166 (2017), 122–130.
Tran Ba, L., Le Van, K., Van Elsacker, S., Cornelis, W.M., Effect of cropping system on physical properties of clay soil under intensive rice cultivation. Land Degrad. Dev. 27 (2016), 973–982.
Tuzzin de Moraes, M., Debiasi, H., Carlesso, R., Cezar Franchini, J., Rodrigues da Silva, V., Bonini da Luz, F., Soil physical quality on tillage and cropping systems after two decades in the subtropical region of Brazil. Soil Tillage Res. 155 (2016), 351–362.
Valle, S.R., Dörner, J., Zúñiga, F., Dec, D., Seasonal dynamics of the physical quality of volcanic ash soils under different land uses in southern Chile. Soil Tillage Res. 182 (2018), 25–34.
Van Genuchten, M.T., A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils 1. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (1980), 892–898.
Wang, X., Cai, D., Hoogmoed, W., Oenema, O., Perdok, U.J., Developments in conservation tillage in rainfed regions of North China. Soil Tillage Res. 93 (2007), 239–250.
Wang, X., Dai, K., Zhang, D., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Zhao, Q., Cai, D., Hoogmoed, W.B., Oenema, O., Dryland maize yields and water use efficiency in response to tillage/crop stubble and nutrient management practices in China. Field Crops Res. 120 (2011), 47–57.
Wang, B., Gao, L., Yu, W., Wei, X., Li, J., Li, S., Song, X., Liang, G., Cai, D., Wu, X., Distribution of soil aggregates and organic carbon in deep soil under long-term conservation tillage with residual retention in dryland. J. Arid Land 11 (2019), 241–254.
Wilson, M.G., Sasal, M.C., Caviglia, O.P., Critical bulk density for a Mollisol and a Vertisol using least limiting water range. Geoderma 192 (2013), 354–361.
Yan, W., Zhong, Y., Shangguan, Z., Responses of different physiological parameter thresholds to soil water availability in four plant species during prolonged drought. Agric. For. Meteorol. 247 (2017), 311–319.

Similar publications