Focusing: A new challenger for improving the empathy skills of medical students

[en] Objectives: Studies of empathy among medical students reported an alarming significant decline during medical education. Some authors identified the third year of education as the most problematic one: empathy decreased significantly when the curriculum was shifting to patient-care activities. Scientists have tried to address the means and methods for improving empathy skills (e.g., by improving communication abilities), but investigations on this topic are missing. Based on the Damasio’s hypothesis and scientific studies, we assume that Focusing (i.e., an embodied practice where one attends to a bodily felt sense and uses it to understand the self and situations) would be significantly and positively linked to empathy. Method: After their clinical internships, we selected third-year medical students (N=121) and asked them to complete three questionnaires assessing empathy, Focusing, and social desirability. Results: By controlling social desirability, findings confirmed that Focusing (especially the “having access to the felt body” component) was significantly and positively linked with empathy (i.e., Fantasy & Perspective-Taking), and positively predicted Fantasy, Perspective-Taking, and Empathic Concern. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that the felt body plays a role in increasing empathy (mainly on cognitive empathy). Few scientific studies have described constructs that significantly promote cognitive empathy and empathic concern (a deeply anchored trait of empathy), which suggests new avenues of investigation.

Disciplines :

Education & instruction

Author, co-author :

Nasello, Julian ; Université de Liège - ULiège > RUC

Triffaux, Jean-Marc ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Psychologie médicale

Language :

English

Title :

Focusing: A new challenger for improving the empathy skills of medical students

Publication date :

29 July 2020

Journal title :

Complementary Therapies in Medicine

ISSN :

0965-2299

Publisher :

Elsevier

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 18 August 2020

Statistics

Number of views

90 (23 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

214 (12 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Decety, J., Lamm, C., Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. Scientific World Journal 6 (2006), 1146–1163, 10.1100/tsw.2006.221.
Decety, J., The neural pathways, development and functions of empathy. Curr Opin Behav Sci 3 (2015), 1–6, 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.001.
Chen, D., Lew, R., Hershman, W., Orlander, J., A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. J Gen Intern Med 22 (2007), 1343–1348, 10.1007/s11606-007-0298-x.
Hojat, M., Vergare, M.J., Maxwell, K., et al. The devil is in the third year: A longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med 84 (2009), 1182–1191, 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.
Triffaux, J.M., Tisseron, S., Nasello, J.A., Decline of empathy among medical students: Dehumanization or useful coping process?. L'Encephale 45 (2019), 3–8, 10.1016/j.encep.2018.05.003.
Pederson, R., Empirical research on empathy in medicine: A critical review. Patient Educ Couns 76 (2009), 307–322, 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.012.
Newton, B.W., Barber, L., Clardy, J., et al. Is there hardening of the heart during medical school?. Acad Med 83 (2008), 244–249, 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637837.
Nasello, J.A., Triffaux, M.S., Triffaux, J.M., The intergroup empathy bias among incoming medical students. Med Educ Online, 23, 2018, 1527625, 10.1080/10872981.2018.1527625.
Halpern, J., From detached concern to empathy: Humanizing medical practice. 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bonvicini, Ka, Perlin, Mj, Bylund, Cl, et al. Impact of communication training on physician expression of empathy in patient encounters. Patient Educ Couns 75 (2009), 3–10, 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.007.
Klimecki, O.M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., Singer, T., Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affect Neuroscience 9 (2014), 873–879, 10.1093/scan/nst060.
van Berkhout, E.T., Malouff, J.M., The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Couns Psychol 63 (2016), 32–41, 10.1037/cou0000093.
Damasio, A.R., Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. 1994, A Grosset/Putnam Books, New-York.
Körner, A., Strack, F., Embodiment: reflective and impulsive processes. Hauke, G., Kritikos, A., (eds.) Embodiment in psychotherapy, 2018, Springer, Cham.
Rizzolatti, G., Carmada, R., Fogassi, L., et al. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey: II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res 71 (1988), 491–507.
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Rizzolatti, G., Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 (1996), 593–609, 10.1093/brain/119.2.593.
Rizzolatti, G., Craighero, L., The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27 (2004), 169–192, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.
Gallese, V., Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Res 1079 (2006), 15–24, 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.054.
Preston, S.D., de Waal, F.B.M., Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci 25 (2002), 1–72.
Chartrand, T.L., Lakin, J.L., The antecedents and consequences of human behavioural mimicry. Annu Rev Psychol 64 (2013), 285–308, 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754.
Stel, M., Vonk, R., Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. Br J Psychol 101 (2010), 311–323, 10.1348/000712609X465424.
Ernst, J., Northoff, G., Böker, H., et al. Interoceptive awareness enhances neural activity during empathy. Hum Brain Mapp 34 (2013), 1615–1624, 10.1002/hbm.22014.
Gallup, G.G., Platek, S.M., Cognitive empathy presupposes self-awareness: Evidence from phylogeny, ontogeny, neuropsychology, and mental illness. Behav Brain Sci 25 (2002), 36–37, 10.1017/S0140525X02380014.
Aoki, T., Ikemi, A., The focusing Manner Scale: Its validity, research background and its potential as a measure of embodied experiencing. Pers Exp Psychother 13 (2014), 31–46, 10.1080/14779757.2013.870925.
Racine, S., Echelle des attitudes de Focusing (EAF): traduction française et validation de la Focusing Manner Scale (FMS-A.A.) [Exigence partielle, Thèse de Doctorat en Psychologie]. 2017, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Québec Retrieved from: https://constellation.uqac.ca/4638/.
Hoffman, M.L., Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychol Bull 84 (1977), 712–722.
Jolliffe, D., Farrington, D.P., Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. J Adolesc 29 (2006), 589–611, 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.
Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowitsch, H.J., Shah, N.J., et al. Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy. Neuroimage 42 (2008), 393–403, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.180.
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D'Ambrosio, F., et al. The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychol Assess 25 (2013), 679–691, 10.1037/a0032297.
Davis, M.H., Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 44 (1983), 113–126, 10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.113.
Ballard, R., Short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Psychol Rep 71 (1992), 1155–1160, 10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3f.1155.
Gilet, A.L., Mella, N., Studer, J., et al. Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: A French validation of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences 45 (2013), 42–48, 10.1037/a0030425.
Mick, D.G., Are studies of dark side variables confounded by the socially desirable responding? The case of materialism. J Consum Res 23 (1996), 106–119, 10.1086/209470.
Verardi, S., Dahourou, D., Ah-Kion, J., et al. Psychometric properties of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale in eight african countries and Switzerland. J Cross Cult Psychol 41 (2009), 19–34, 10.1177/0022022109348918.
Reynolds, W.M., Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. J Clin Psychol 38 (1982), 119–125, 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:13.0.CO;2-I.
IBM Corp, Released 2016. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 24.0. 2016, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY.
The Jamovi Project, Jamovi (version 1.1.9.0). Computer software, 2019, Jamovi Retrieved from: https://www.jamovi.org.
Eisenberg, N., Morris, A.S., McDaniel, B., Spinrad, T.L., Moral cognitions and prosocial responding in adolescence. Lerner, R.M., Steinberg, (eds.) Handbook of adolescent psychology: vol. 1, individual bases of adolescent development, 3rd ed, 2009, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 229–265.
Hoffman, M.L., Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. 2001, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Bun Lam, C., Solmeyer, A.R., McHale, S.M., Sibling relationships and empathy across the transition to adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 41 (2012), 1657–1670, 10.1007/s10964-012-9781-8.
Shanafelt, T.D., West, C., Zhao, X., et al. Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 20 (2005), 559–564, 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0108.x.
Cliffordson, C., The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. Scand J Psychol 43 (2002), 49–59, 10.1111/1467-9450.00268.
Briganti, G., Kempenaers, C., Braun, S., et al. Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults. Psychiatry Res 265 (2018), 87–92, 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.082.
Strack, F., Martin, L.L., Stepper, S., Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 54 (1988), 768–777, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768.
Frith, C.D., Frith, U., The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50 (2006), 531–534, 10.1080/17470910701577020.
Jospe, K., Flöel, A., Lavidor, M., The interaction between embodiment and empathy in facial expression recognition. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 13 (2018), 203–215, 10.1093/scan/nsy005.
Silani, G., Bird, G., Brindley, R., et al. Levels of emotional awareness and autism: An fMRI study. Soc Neurosci 3 (2008), 97–112, 10.1080/17470910701577020.
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 358 (2003), 345–360, 10.1098/rstb.2002.1202.
Charman, T., Swettenham, J., Baron-Cohen, S., et al. Infants with Autism: An investigation of empathy, pretend play, joint attention, and imitation. Dev Psychol 33 (1997), 781–789.
Eigsti, I.M., A review of embodiment in autism Spectrum disorders. Front Psychol, 4, 2013, 224, 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00224.
Iacoboni, M., Understanding others: imitation, language, and empathy. Hurley, S., Chater, N., (eds.) Perspectives on imitation: from neuroscience to social science: vol. 1. Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals, 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US, 77–99.
Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., Rizzolatti, G., Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73 (1995), 2608–2611, 10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608.
Kilic R., Nasello J.A., Melchior V., & Triffaux J.M. (In press). Academic burnout among medical students: A challenge for education and public health. Submitted for publication.