An assessment of the spatial efficiency of tax benefits for home mortgages in Belgium

[en] In this paper, we focus on the tax deductibility of mortgage loans, which is a key measure of housing policies in many countries. Several studies have shown that the distribution of the benefits of this measure runs counter to the vertical equity principle. We contribute to the existing literature by addressing the distribution of the tax deductibility of mortgage loans considering the spatial outcomes of this policy. We use Belgian data to measure the impact of this policy on households' income and inequality and poverty in different types of areas. We show that this measure favours suburban households and subsidizes urban sprawl. Exogenous factors such as past housing policies and homeownership determinants play a key role in this phenomenon. We also simulate the distributional impact of three stylized reforms of the deductibility of mortgage loans in Belgium. These simulations show that the distributional outcomes could be improved on both social and spatial sides.

Disciplines :

Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...)
Human geography & demography
Microeconomics

Author, co-author :

Xhignesse, Guillaume ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de droit > Finances publiques et politique économique

Verbist, Gerlinde; Universiteit Antwerpen - UA > Centrum voor Sociaal Beleid Herman Deleeck

Language :

English

Title :

An assessment of the spatial efficiency of tax benefits for home mortgages in Belgium

Publication date :

May 2019

Journal title :

Housing Studies

ISSN :

0267-3037

eISSN :

1466-1810

Publisher :

Taylor and Francis, Abingdon, United Kingdom

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique

Available on ORBi :

since 31 July 2020

Statistics

Number of views

129 (9 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

5 (4 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Alonso, W. (1964). Location and Land Use (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
Anderson, J. E., & Roy, A. G. (2001). Eliminating housing tax preferences: A distributional analysis. Journal of Housing Economics, 10 (1), 41–58.
Andrews, D., & Caldera Sánchez, A. (2011). The evolution of homeownership rates in selected OECD countries: Demographic and public policy influences. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2011 (1), 1–37.
Anfrie M.-N., & Gobert O. (2017). Les ménages candidats à un logement public en Wallonie au 1er janvier 2017 (Charleroi, Belgique: Centre d’Études en Habitat Durable).
Atkinson, A. (1980). Horizontal inequity and the distribution of the tax burden. In H. Aaron & M. Boskin (Eds), The Economics of Taxation, pp. 3–18.
Atkinson, A., Rainwater, L. & Smeeding, T. (1995). Income distribution in OECD countries. OECD Social Policy Studies, 18.
Bayenet, B. (2015). Quel avenir pour le bonus logement? http://www.biof.be/uploaded/files/201507091455430.Presentation_Bayenet_Benoit.pdf
Bernard, N., & Lemaire, V. (2015). La régionalisation du «bonus logement»: vers une politique adaptée au contexte bruxellois? Brussels Studies, 83.
Bourassa, S., & Grigsby, W. (2000). Income tax concessions for owner-occupied housing. Housing Policy Debate, 11 (3), 521–546.
Bourassa, S., Haurin, D., Hendershott, P., & Hoesli, M. (2013). Mortgage interest deductions and homeownership: An international survey. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 21 (2), 181–203.
Bourguignon, F., & Spadaro, A. (2006). Microsimulation as a tool for evaluating redistribution policies. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 4 (1), 77–106.
Brady, P., Cronin, J. A., & Houser, S. (2003). Regional differences in the utilization of the mortgage interest deduction. Public Finance Review, 31 (4), 327–366.
Brueckner, J. K. (2000). Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review, 23 (2), 160–171.
Brueckner, J. K., Thisse, J. F., & Zenou, Y. (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European economic review, 43 (1), 91–107.
Catte, P., Girouard, N., Price, R., & André, C. (2004). Housing Markets, Wealth and the Business Cycle. OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
Clark, T., & Leicester, A. (2004). Inequality and two decades of British tax and benefit reforms. Fiscal Studies, 25 (2), 129–158.
Cole, A. J., Gee, G., & Turner, N. (2011). The distributional and revenue consequences of reforming the mortgage interest deduction. National Tax Journal, 64, 977–1000.
Damen, S., Vastmans, F., & Buyst, E. (2016). The effect of mortgage interest deduction and mortgage characteristics on house prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 34, 15–29.
De Decker, P. (2008). Facets of housing and housing policies in Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23 (3), 155–171.
De Decker, P. (2001). Jammed between housing and property rights: Belgian private renting in perspective. European Journal of Housing Policy, 1 (1), 17–39.
De Decker, P. (2011). Understanding housing sprawl: The case of Flanders, Belgium. Environment and Planning A, 43 (7), 1634–1654.
De Decker, P. (2014). Afbouw woonbonus: nu of nooit. Samenleving en Politiek, 21 (1), 65–74.
De Decker, P., & Dewilde, C. (2010). Home-ownership and asset-based welfare: The case of Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25 (2), 243–262.
De Keersmaecker, M. L., Barthe Batsalle, H., Brück, L., Georges, X., Halleux, J.-M., Lambotte, J.-M., Maréchal, L., & Rousseaux, V. (2002). Les coûts de la désurbanisation. http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/63358/1/FINAL.CPDT-E%26D-1.pdf
De Vos, J., & Witlox, F. (2013). Transportation policy as spatial planning tool: Reducing urban sprawl by increasing travel costs and clustering infrastructure and public transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, 33, 117–125.
Defeyt, P. (2014). Supprimons le bonus-logement, et donnons 500 euros aux ménages. http://www.lalibre.be/actu/belgique/defeyt-supprimons-le-bonus-logement-et-donnons-500-euros-aux-menages-53e78e693570667a6391f36e
Dietz, R., & Haurin, D. (2003). The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 54 (3), 401–450.
Dol, K., & Haffner, M. (2010). Housing Statistics in the European Union 2010. (Delft University of Technology).
Doling, J., & Ford, J. (2007). A union of home owners. International Journal of Housing Policy, 7 (2), 113–112.
Dubois, O. (2005). Le rôle des politiques publiques dans l’éclatement urbain: l’exemple de la Belgique. Développement durable et territoires, 4.
Feldstein, M. (1976). On the theory of tax reform. Journal of Public Economics, 6 (1–2), 77–104.
Figari, F., Paulus, A., Sutherland, H., Tsakloglou, P., Verbist, G., & Zantomio, F. (2017). Removing homeownership bias in taxation: The distributional effects of including net imputed rent in taxable income. Fiscal Studies, 38 (4), 525–557.
Follain, J., & Melamed, L. (1998). The false messiah of tax policy: What elimination of the home mortgage interest deduction promises and a careful look at what it delivers. Journal of Housing Research, 9 (2), 179–199.
FPS Mobility & Transport. (2016). Diagnostic des déplacements domicile-lieu de travail 2014.
FPS Economy (2001). Enquête socio-économique générale.
Gervais, M., & Pandey, M. (2008). Who cares about mortgage interest deductibility? Canadian Public Policy, 34 (1), 1–23.
Glaeser, E. (2010). Housing policy in the wake of the crash. Daedalus, 139 (4), 95–106.
Glaeser, E. (2011). Rethinking the federal bias toward homeownership. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 13 (2), 5–37.
Glaeser, E., Kahn, M. E., & Rappaport, J. (2008). Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of urban Economics, 63 (1), 1–24.
Goedemé, T., Van den Bosch, K., Salanauskaite, L., & Verbist, G. (2013). Testing the statistical significance of microsimulation results: A plea. International Journal of Microsimulation, 6 (3), 50–77.
Grimmeau, J. P., Decroly, J. M., & Wertz, I. (2012). La démographie des communes belges de 1980 à 2010. Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, 37, 1–90.
Gyourko, J., & Sinai, T. (2003). The spatial distribution of housing‐related ordinary income tax benefits. Real Estate Economics, 31 (4), 527–575.
Halleux, J. M., & Lambotte, J. M. (2004). Friches d’habitat et désurbanisation en Wallonie. Géocarrefour, 79 (2), 153–161.
Halleux, J.-M., Brück, L., & Mairy, N. (2002). La périurbanisation résidentielle en Belgique à la lumière des contextes suisse et danois: enracinement, dynamiques centrifuges et régulations collectives. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, 4, 333–354.
Halleux, J. M., Marcinczak, S., & van der Krabben, E. (2012). The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland. Land Use Policy, 29 (4), 887–898.
Hemmelgarn, T., Nicodeme, G., & Zangari, E. (2012). The role of housing tax provisions, in: J. Alworth & G. Arachi (Eds) Taxation and the Financial Crisis, pp. 61–87 (Oxford University Press).
Heylen, K. (2009). Homeownership in Flanders: A Cohort Approach. Presentation at ENHR Conference, Prague, June 2009.
Heylen, K., & Haffner, M. (2012). The effect of housing expenses and subsidies on the income distribution in Flanders and the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 27 (8), 1142–1161.
Heylen, K. (2013). The distributional impact of housing subsidies in Flanders. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13 (1), 45–65.
Heylen, K. (2016). Woonsubsidies in Vlaanderen: Verdelinganalyse voor 2013. https://steunpuntwonen.be/Documenten_2012-2015/Onderzoek_Werkpakketten/WP7_Woonsubsidies_in_Vlaanderen.-Verdelingsanalyse-2013.pdf
Hilber, C. (2010). New housing supply and the dilution of social capital. Journal of Urban Economics, 67 (3), 419–437.
Hilber, C., & Mayer, C. (2009). Why do households without children support local public schools? Linking house price capitalization to school spending. Journal of Urban Economics, 65 (1), 74–90.
Hilber, C., & Turner, T. (2014). The mortgage interest deduction and its impact on homeownership decisions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96 (4), 618–637.
Hills, J. (1991). Distributional effects of housing subsidies in the United Kingdom. Journal of Public Economics, 44 (3), 321–352.
Hoebeeck, A., & Smolders, C. (2014). De impact van de Woonbonus op eigenaarschap in België: een difference-in-differences benadering. Steunpunt Fiscaliteit en Begroting Working Papers.
IMF. (2009). Debt Bias and Other Distorsions: Crisis-related Issues in Tax Policy (IMF Fiscal Affairs Department).
Isebaert, D., Heylen, F., & Smolders, C. (2015). Houses and/or jobs: Ownership and the labour market in Belgian districts. Regional Studies, 49 (8), 1387–1406.
Jahoda, R., & Godarova, J. (2014). Distribution impact of the mortgage interest deduction in the Czech Republic. Review of European Studies, 6 (2), 110.
Jenkins, S. (2015). INEQDECO: Stata module to calculate inequality indices with decomposition by subgroup, revised version. Boston College Department of Economics.
Johnson, M. P. (2001). Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and planning A, 33 (4), 717–735.
Juntto, A. & Reijo, M. (2010). The comparability of imputed rent in EU-SILC 2007–differences in variable definitions and methods concerning institutional housing. EUROSTAT Methodologies and Working Papers. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Lambert, P. (2001). The Distribution and Redistribution of Income (Manchester University Press).
Lambert, P., & Yitzhaki, S. (1995). Equity, equality and welfare. European Economic Review, 39 (3), 674–682.
Lejeune, Z., Xhignesse, G., Kryvobokov, M., & Teller, J. (2016). Housing quality as environmental inequality: The case of Wallonia, Belgium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31, 495–512.
Loopmans, M., Teller, J., De Decker, P., Heylen, K., Winters, S., Minon, C., Verstraete, J., Van den Broeck, K., Vandenbroucke, S., Moris, M., Perrin, N., & Meeus, B. (2014). Baromètre de la diversité: Logement privé. http://unia.be/files/Z_ARCHIEF/barometre_de_la_diversite_logement.pdf
Lux, M., Sunega, P., & Boelhouwer, P. (2009). The effectiveness of selected housing subsidies in the Czech Republic. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24 (3), 249–269.
Macharis, C., & De Witte, A. (2012). The typical company car user does not exist: The case of Flemish company car drivers. Transport Policy, 24, 91–98.
Maniquet, F., & Neumann, D. (2016). L’allocation universelle: quelques éléments pour y voir plus clair. Regards Economiques, 126.
Matsaganis, M., & Flevotomou, M. (2007). The impact of mortgage interest tax relief in the Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy and Greece. EUROMOD Working Paper Series.
May, X. (2017). L'épineuse question du nombre de voitures de société en Belgique. Brussels Studies factsheet. Brussels Studies.
Mieszkowski, P., & Mills, E. S. (1993). The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (3), 135–147.
Mills, E. S. (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. The American Economic Review, 57 (2), 197–210.
Mirrlees, J., Adam, S., Besley, T., Blundell, R., Bond, S., Chote, R., Gammie, M., Johnson, P., Myles, G. and Poterba, J. (Eds) (2011), Tax by Design: The Mirrlees Review (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Monnier, B. & Zimmer, P. (2008). Fiscalité immobilière: le coût de la brique dans le ventre. Les Echos du Logement, 2, 17–22.
Mougenot, C. (1988). Promoting the single‐family house in Belgium: The social construction of model housing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12 (4), 531–549.
Mougenot, C. (1999). La Société nationale de la Petite Propriété Terrienne, Une institution entre ville et campagne. Cahiers de l'Urbanisme, 25–26, 145–148.
Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1973). Public Finance in Theory and Practice.
Muth, R. (1969). Cities and housing (University of Chicago Press).
Nechyba, T. J., & Walsh, R. P. (2004). Urban sprawl. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (4), 177–200.
OECD. (2010). Trends in Urbanisation and Urban Policies in OECD Countries: What Lessons for China ?
OECD. (2013). OECD Economic Surveys: Belgium 2013.
O'Sullivan, A., & Gibb, K. (2012). Housing taxation and the economic benefits of homeownership. Housing Studies, 27 (2), 267–279.
Oxley, M., & Smith, J. (1996). Housing Policy and Rented Housing in Europe (Taylor & Francis).
Poterba, J., & Sinai, T. (2008). Tax expenditures for owner-occupied housing: Deductions for property taxes and mortgage interest and the exclusion of imputed rental income. The American Economic Review, 98 (2), 84–89.
Saunders, P. (1990). A Nation of Home Owners (Unwin Hyman).]
Schuermans, N., Meeus, B., & De Decker, P. (2014). Geographies of Whiteness and wealth: White, middle class discourses on segregation and social mix in Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37 (4), 478–495.
Shiller, R. (2007). Understanding recent trends in house prices and home ownership. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers.
Sinai, T., & Gyourko, J. (2004). The (Un) changing geographical distribution of Housing Tax Benefits: 1980–2000. Tax policy and the economy, 18, 175–208.
Slemrod, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. Handbook of Public Economics, 3, 1423–1470.
SLRB-BGHM. (2017). http://www.slrb.irisnet.be
Statistics Belgium. (2015a). Census 2011: Profil des habitants et propriétaires de logements récents. http://census2011.fgov.be/analyse/logement_fr.html
Statistics Belgium. (2015b). Census 2011: Les grandes villes abritent moins de propriétaires occupants. http://census2011.fgov.be/idk/idk2_fr.html
Statistics Belgium. (2015c). Census 2011: Déplacements domicile lieu de travail. http://census2011.fgov.be/analyse/flux_fr.html
Sutherland, H., & Figari, F. (2013). EUROMOD: The European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model. International Journal of Microsimulation, 6 (1), 4–26.
Stiglitz, J. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector.
Törmälehto, V.-M. & Sauli, H. (2013). The distributional impact of imputed rent in EU-SILC 2007–2010. EUROSTAT Methodologies and working papers. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Vandermotten, C., Marissal, P., Van Hamme, G., Kesteloot, C., Slegers, K., Vandenbroucke, A., et al. (2006). Analyse dynamique des quartiers en difficulté dans les régions urbaines belges.
Valenduc, C. (2008). Les incitations fiscales en faveur du logement. Les Echos du Logement, 2, 1–16.
Vanneste, D., Goosens, L., & Thomas, I. (2007). Le logement en Belgique. Enquête socio-économique 2001. http://statbel.fgov.be/fr/binaries/mono_200102_fr%5B1%5D_tcm326-35799.pdf
Vanneste, D., Thomas, I., & Vanderstraeten, L. (2008). The spatial structure (s) of the Belgian housing stock. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23 (3), 173–198.
Ventry, D. (2010). The accidental deduction: A history and critique of the tax subsidy for mortgage interest. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73 (1), 233–284.
Verbist, G. (2002). An inquiry into the redistributive effect of personal income taxes in Belgium. Unpublished thesis.
Verbist, G., & Vanhille, J. (2012). Simulating Rent Subsidies for Households in Flanders. A Distribution Analysis. Flemosi Discussion Paper.
Verbist, G., & Van Lancker, W. (2016). Horizontal and vertical equity objectives of child benefit systems: An empirical assessment for European countries. Social Indicators Research, 128 (3), 1299–1318.
VMSW. (2016). Kandidaat-Huurders Statistisch Bulletin 2016.
Voith, R. (1999). Does The U.S. Tax Treatment of Housing Create An Incentive for Exclusionary Zoning and Increased Decentralization? Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper, 99–22.
Voith, R., & Gyourko, J. (2002). Capitalization of federal taxes, the relative price of housing, and urban form: Density and sorting effects. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32 (6), 673–690.
Winters, S. (2013). Belgian state reform as an opportunity to reorient Flemish housing policy. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13 (1), 90–99.