Brain Metabolism but Not Gray Matter Volume Underlies the Presence of Language Function in the Minimally Conscious State (MCS): MCS+ Versus MCS− Neuroimaging Differences
Chatelle, Camille ; Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium, Centre du Cerveau², University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium
Laureys, Steven ; Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA Consciousness-Coma Science Group
Thibaut, Aurore ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Consciousness-Coma Science Group
Language :
English
Title :
Brain Metabolism but Not Gray Matter Volume Underlies the Presence of Language Function in the Minimally Conscious State (MCS): MCS+ Versus MCS− Neuroimaging Differences
Publication date :
2020
Journal title :
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
ISSN :
1545-9683
eISSN :
1552-6844
Publisher :
SAGE
Volume :
34
Issue :
2
Pages :
172-184
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
JSMF - James S McDonnell Foundation FERB - Fondazione Europea Ricerca Biomedica F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58:349-353.
Wannez S, Gosseries O, Azzolini D, et al. Prevalence of Coma-Recovery Scale–revised signs of consciousness in patients in minimally conscious state. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28:1350-1359.
Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Thibaut A, Moonen G, Laureys S., From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J Neurol. 2011;258:1373-1384.
Thibaut A, Bodien YG, Laureys S, Giacino JT, et al. Minimally conscious state “ plus ”: diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery. Epub ahead of print 26 November 2019.[published online November 26, 2019]. J Neurol. doi:10.1007/s00415-019-09628-y
Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J., The JFK Coma Recovery Scale–revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:2020-2029.
Schnakers C, Bessou H, Rubi-Fessen I, et al. Impact of aphasia on consciousness assessment: a cross-sectional study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:41-47.
Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno MA, et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. Lancet. 2014;384:514-522.
Bruno MA, Majerus S, Boly M, et al. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol. 2012;259:1087-1098.
Aubinet C, Larroque SK, Heine L, et al. Clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state according to resting functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39:4519-4532.
Ardila A, Bernal B, Rosselli M., How extended is Wernicke’s area? Meta-analytic connectivity study of BA20 and integrative proposal. Neurosci J. 2016;2016:4962562.
Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Hervé PY, et al. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage. 2006;30:1414-1432.
Aubinet C, Panda R, Larroque SK, et al. Reappearance of command-following is associated with the recovery of language and internal-awareness networks: a longitudinal multiple-case report. 2019;13:8.
Schnakers C, Majerus S, Giacino J, et al. A French validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj. 2008;22:786-792.
Wannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Laureys S,; Coma Science Group Collaborators. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. 2017;81:883-889.
Thibaut A, Bruno MA, Chatelle C, et al. Metabolic activity in external and internal awareness networks in severely brain-damaged patients. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:487-494.
Phillips CL, Bruno MA, Maquet P, et al. “Relevance vector machine” consciousness classifier applied to cerebral metabolism of vegetative and locked-in patients. Neuroimage. 2011;56:797-808.
Ashburner J., A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007;38:95-113.
Di Perri C, Bahri MA, Amico E, et al. Neural correlates of consciousness in patients who have emerged from a minimally conscious state: a cross-sectional multimodal imaging study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:830-842.
Minkova L, Habich A, Peter J, Kaller CP, Eickhoff SB, Klöppel S., Gray matter asymmetries in aging and neurodegeneration: a review and meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:5890-5904.
Chumbley J, Worsley K, Flandin G, Friston K., Topological FDR for neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2010;49:3057-3064.
Crone JS, Soddu A, Höller Y, et al. Altered network properties of the fronto-parietal network and the thalamus in impaired consciousness. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;4:240-248.
Aubinet C, Murphy L, Bahri MA, et al. Brain, behavior, and cognitive interplay in disorders of consciousness: a multiple case study. Front Neurol. 2018;9:665.
Morozova S, Kremneva E, Sergeev D, et al. Conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating chronic disorders of consciousness. Brain Sci. 2018;8:E144.
Annen J, Frasso G, Crone JS, et al; Coma Science Group Collaborators. Regional brain volumetry and brain function in severely brain-injured patients. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:842-853.
Giraud AL, Kell C, Thierfelder C, et al. Contributions of sensory input, auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:247-255.
Vorobyev VA, Alho K, Medvedev SV, et al. Linguistic processing in visual and modality-nonspecific brain areas: PET recordings during selective attention. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004;20:309-322.
McDermott KB, Petersen SE, Watson JM, Ojemann JG., A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:293-303.
Chou TL, Booth JR, Bitan T, et al. Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:915-924.
Friedman L, Kenny JT, Wise AL, et al. Brain activation during silent word generation evaluated with functional MRI. Brain Lang. 1998;64:231-256.
Humphries C, Binder JR, Medler DA, Liebenthal E., Time course of semantic processes during sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2007;36:924-932.
Dronkers NF, Wilkins DP, Van Valin RD, Jr Redfern BB, Jaeger JJ., Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition. 2004;92:145-177.
Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL., Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2767-2796.
Slotnick SD, Moo LR., Prefrontal cortex hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate visual spatial memory. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:1560-1568.
Zhang JX, Leung HC, Johnson MK., Frontal activations associated with accessing and evaluating information in working memory: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1531-1539.
Ranganath C, Johnson MK, D’Esposito M., Prefrontal activity associated with working memory and episodic long-term memory. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:378-389.
Hugdahl K, Lundervold A, Ersland L, et al. Left frontal activation during a semantic categorization task: an fMRI-study. Int J Neurosci. 1999;99:49-58.
Desmond JE, Gabrieli JDE, Glover GH., Dissociation of frontal and cerebellar activity in a cognitive task: evidence for a distinction between selection and search. Neuroimage. 1998;7(4 pt 1):368-376.
Anderlini D, Wallis G, Marinovic W., Language as a predictor of motor recovery: the case for a more global approach to stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33:167-178.
Grossman M, Cooke A, DeVita C, et al. Sentence processing strategies in healthy seniors with poor comprehension: an fMRI study. Brain Lang. 2002;80:296-313.
Heim S, Eickhoff SB, Amunts K., Specialisation in Broca’s region for semantic, phonological, and syntactic fluency? Neuroimage. 2008;40:1362-1368.
Fox PT, Ingham RJ, Ingham JC, Zamarripa F, Xiong JH, Lancaster JL., Brain correlates of stuttering and syllable production. A PET performance-correlation analysis. Brain. 2000;123(1 pt 10):1985-2004.
Matsumura M, Sadato N, Kochiyama T, et al. Role of the cerebellum in implicit motor skill learning: a PET study. Brain Res Bull. 2004;63:471-483.
Zhu D, Chang J, Freeman S, et al. Changes of functional connectivity in the left frontoparietal network following aphasic stroke. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:167.
Sharp DJ, Turkheimer FE, Bose SK, Scott SK, Wise RJ., Increased frontoparietal integration after stroke and cognitive recovery. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:753-756.
Stender J, Kupers R, Rodell A, et al. Quantitative rates of brain glucose metabolism distinguish minimally conscious from vegetative state patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:58-65.
Brown AW, Pretz CR, Bell KR, et al. Predictive utility of an adapted Marshall head CT classification scheme after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2019;33:610-617.
Edlow BL, Chatelle C, Spencer CA, et al. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2017;140:2399-2414.
Schiff ND., Cognitive motor dissociation following severe brain injuries. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1413-1415.
Annen J, Blandiaux S, Lejeune N, et al. BCI performance and brain metabolism profile in severely brain-injured patients without response to command at bedside. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:370.
Coleman MR, Rodd JM, Davis MH, et al. Do vegetative patients retain aspects of language comprehension? Evidence from fMRI. Brain. 2007;130(pt 10):2494-2507.
Owen AM, Coleman MR., Functional neuroimaging of the vegetative state. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:235-243.
Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O., Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:600-614.
Thibaut A, Chennu S, Chatelle C, et al. Theta network centrality correlates with tDCS response in disorders of consciousness. Brain Stimul. 2018;11:1407-1409.
Demertzi A, Soddu A, Laureys S., Consciousness supporting networks. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:239-244.
Chatelle C, Hauger SL, Martial C, et al. Assessment of nociception and pain in participants in an unresponsive or minimally conscious state after acquired brain injury: the relation between the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised and the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:1755-1762.
Chatelle C, Thibaut A, Bruno MA, et al. Nociception Coma Scale–Revised scores correlate with metabolism in the anterior cingulate cortex. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:149-152.
Pistoia F, Sarà M, Sacco S, Carolei A., Vegetative states and minimally conscious states revisited: a Russian doll approach. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1330-1331.
Zheng ZS, Reggente N, Lutkenhoff E, Owen AM, Monti MM., Disentangling disorders of consciousness: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and machine learning. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:431-443.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.