Other (Scientific journals)
Correction to: Minimally conscious state “plus”: diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery (Journal of Neurology, (2020), 267, 5, (1245-1254), 10.1007/s00415-019-09628-y)
Thibaut, Aurore; Bodien, Y. G.; Laureys, Steven et al.
2020In Journal of Neurology, 267 (5), p. 1255-1259
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Thibaut2020_Article_CorrectionToMinimallyConscious-1.pdf
Publisher postprint (554.5 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Following electronic publication of the above-referenced manuscript, we discovered that one of the three criteria we proposed to establish command-following in the MCS+ syndrome was inadvertently omitted in some parts of the manuscript. Specifically, "object recognition" was omitted from the criteria used to diagnose MCS+. We operationally define command-following as a Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) Auditory Subscale score of 3 (i.e. reproducible command-following: A3) or 4 (i.e. consistent commandfollowing: A4), or a Visual Subscale score of 5 (i.e. object recognition: V5). However, in Tables 1 and 2 and Figs. 2 and 3, we failed to include object recognition as a criterion for MCS+. In addition, in Fig. 4 (CRS-R Face Sheet), object recognition is not labeled as a criterion for MCS+. Therefore, we would like to highlight the corrected parts of our manuscript to clarify that the criteria for "command-following" include object recognition (V5) as well as reproducible (A3) and consistent (A4) command-following. Please note that these modifications do not change any of the findings of the study. Please find the individual corrections here: In the section “Methods” the paragraph “consistent command following” needs to be replaced by: Command following: At least three clearly-discernible behavioral responses are observed over four consecutive trials on at least one of two commands. Note that this definition also includes object recognition. At the end of the “Procedures” paragraph, the following text needs to be added before Table 1. Note that we did not include “attention” from the Arousal Subscale as a criterion for MCS+ because all responses, regardless of accuracy, are considered when scoring this item. This item can be scored even in the absence of intact language function. For example, a patient with aphasia who does not comprehend language but understands that a response is anticipated may meet the required criteria. At the end of the section “Results” the word “lower” needs to be replaced by “higher”: The MCS- group had significantly higher (i.e., worse) DRS scores than all other groups (all p values < 0.05—supplementary Fig. S3). Please find the corrected Figs. 2, 3 and 4, as well as supplemental Fig. 3, on the following page:(Figure presented.), (Table presented.). © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Research center :
CHU de Liège-Centre du Cerveau² - ULiège
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Thibaut, Aurore ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA Consciousness-Coma Science Group
Bodien, Y. G.;  Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Laureys, Steven  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA Consciousness-Coma Science Group
Giacino, J. T.;  Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
Language :
English
Title :
Correction to: Minimally conscious state “plus”: diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery (Journal of Neurology, (2020), 267, 5, (1245-1254), 10.1007/s00415-019-09628-y)
Publication date :
2020
Journal title :
Journal of Neurology
ISSN :
0340-5354
eISSN :
1432-1459
Publisher :
Springer
Volume :
267
Issue :
5
Pages :
1255-1259
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 07 July 2020

Statistics


Number of views
173 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
53 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi