Article (Scientific journals)
Intra‑articular injections of platelet‑rich plasma in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a consensus statement from French‑speaking experts
Eymard, F; Ornetti, P; Maillet, J et al.
2021In Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29 (10), p. 3195-3210
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Eymard2021_Article_Intra-articularInjectionsOfPla.pdf
Publisher postprint (662.66 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Purpose There has been much debate regarding the use of intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as symptomatic treatment for knee osteoarthritis. The objective of this consensus was to develop guidelines for PRP injections in knee osteoarthritis according to the French National Authority for Health recommendations. Methods Fifteen physicians from different French-speaking countries (10 rheumatologists, 4 specialists in rehabilitation and sports medicine and 1 radiologist) were selected for their expertise in the areas of PRP and osteoarthritis. A comprehensive literature review was conducted on Medline including all published therapeutic trials, open studies, meta-analysis and systematic reviews focusing on the effects of PRP in knee OA, as well as fundamental studies concerning the characteristics of the various types of PRP and their mechanisms, indexed before April 2019. Using the method recommended by the French National Authority for Health inspired by the Delphi consensus process, 25 recommendations were finally retained and evaluated. The recommendations were classified as appropriate or not appropriate, with strong or relative agreement, or uncertain if a consensus was not achieved. Results Among the 25 recommendations selected, the main ones are the following: (1) Intra-articular injections of PRP are an effective symptomatic treatment for early to moderate knee osteoarthritis. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 8; rank = 6–9). Level of evidence 1A. (2) A PRP treatment sequence in knee osteoarthritis may include 1–3 injections. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a strong agreement (Median = 9; rank = 7–9). Level of evidence 1A. (3) Leucocytes-poor PRP should be preferred in knee osteoarthritis. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 8; rank = 5–9). Level of evidence 5. (4) Intra-articular PRP knee injections should be performed under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance. This recommendation was considered uncertain with no consensus (Median = 8; rank = 3–9). Level of evidence 5. (5) PRP should not be mixed with an anesthetic or intra-articular corticosteroid. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 9; rank = 6–9). Level of evidence 5 Conclusion Those 25 recommendations should standardize and facilitate the use of IA PRP injections, which are considered by experts as an effective treatment especially in early or moderate knee OA. Although a strong or relative agreement from the experts was obtained for most of the recommendations, many of them had a very low level of evidence (Level 5) and were principally based on the clinical experience of the experts.
Disciplines :
Laboratory medicine & medical technology
Rheumatology
Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine
Author, co-author :
Eymard, F
Ornetti, P
Maillet, J
Noël, E
Adam, P
Legré-Boyer, V
Boyer, T
Allali, F
Gremeaux, V
Kaux, Jean-François  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Médecine physique, réadaptation et traumatologie du sport
Louati, K
Lamontagne, M
Michel, F
Richette, P
Bard, H
More authors (5 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Intra‑articular injections of platelet‑rich plasma in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a consensus statement from French‑speaking experts
Publication date :
October 2021
Journal title :
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
ISSN :
0942-2056
eISSN :
1433-7347
Publisher :
Springer, Germany
Volume :
29
Issue :
10
Pages :
3195-3210
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 25 June 2020

Statistics


Number of views
279 (25 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
60 (12 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
28
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
25
OpenCitations
 
10

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi