Article (Scientific journals)
Randomised phase II study of second-line olaratumab with mitoxantrone/prednisone versus mitoxantrone/prednisone alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Hakenberg, Oliver W.; Perez-Gracia, Jose Luis; Castellano, Daniel et al.
2019In European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 107, p. 186-195
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
olaratumab ± mitoxantrone EJC 2019.pdf
Publisher postprint (604.84 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Antineoplastics; Metastatic; Mitoxantrone; Monoclonal antibodies; Olaratumab; Platelet-derived growth factor alpha; Prostate cancer; Receptor
Abstract :
[en] INTRODUCTION: Platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha (PDGFRalpha) is expressed in primary prostate adenocarcinoma and in associated skeletal metastases. Olaratumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds PDGFRalpha and blocks downstream signalling. This phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of olaratumab in combination with mitoxantrone and prednisone (M/P) versus M/P alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who progressed after docetaxel. METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive 21-d cycles of olaratumab (15 mg/kg, Days 1 and 8) plus mitoxantrone (12 mg/m(2), Day 1) and prednisone (5 mg, twice daily) or M/P alone. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point. Secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), safety, and circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were randomised, 63 to olaratumab + M/P and 60 to M/P. Median PFS was 2.3 months for olaratumab + M/P and 2.4 months for M/P (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87-1.90). Median OS was 14.2 months for olaratumab + M/P and 12.8 months for M/P (HR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.72-1.61). Both treatment arms had similar toxicity profiles; neutropenia (24% versus 15%), anaemia (13% versus 14%) and fatigue (11% versus 9%) (olaratumab + M/P versus M/P, respectively) were the most common grade >/=3 events. High CTC count was associated with poorer OS in both arms. Patients with very high cell counts (>37 cells/7.5 ml) exhibited improved OS with olaratumab + M/P (interaction P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Olaratumab + M/P had an acceptable safety profile but did not improve the efficacy of M/P chemotherapy. Further study with selected patient populations and earlier in the disease course might be considered.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Hakenberg, Oliver W.
Perez-Gracia, Jose Luis
Castellano, Daniel
Demkow, Tomasz
Ali, Tarek
Caffo, Orazio
Heidenreich, Axel
Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang
Sautois, Brieuc  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Département des sciences cliniques
Pavlik, Ivan
Qin, Amy
Novosiadly, Ruslan D.
Shahir, Ashwin
Ilaria, Robert Jr
Nippgen, Johannes
More authors (5 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Randomised phase II study of second-line olaratumab with mitoxantrone/prednisone versus mitoxantrone/prednisone alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Publication date :
2019
Journal title :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN :
0959-8049
eISSN :
1879-0852
Volume :
107
Pages :
186-195
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Commentary :
Copyright (c) 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Available on ORBi :
since 11 March 2020

Statistics


Number of views
57 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
10
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
10
OpenCitations
 
6

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi