Attitudes of professional caregivers and family members regarding the use of monitoring devices to improve assessments of pain and discomfort during continuous sedation until death.
Six, Stefaan; Van Overmeire, Roel; Bilsen, Johanet al.
palliative sedation; monitoring technology; qualitative research
Abstract :
[en] Context
Assessing consciousness and pain during continuous sedation until death (CSD) by behaviorbased
observational scales alone has recently been put into question. Instead, the use of
monitoring technology has been suggested to make more objective and reliable assessments.
Insights into which factors influence attitudes towards using these monitoring devices in a
context of CSD is a first step in formulating recommendations to inform future practice.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to find out what influences professional caregivers’ and family
members’ attitudes regarding the use of monitors during CSD.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 20 professional caregivers and 15
family members, who cared for a patient or had a family member respectively who took part
in a study using monitoring devices. Recruitment took place in an academic hospital, a locoregional
hospital and 2 nursing homes, all located in Belgium. Two researchers independently analysed the data, using grounded theory to inductively develop a model that represents the
emerging attitude towards use of monitors during CSD.
Results
Our model shows that the emerging attitudes towards using monitors during CSD is
determined by view on CSD, desire for peace of mind, emotional valence attached to using
monitors and the realization that the sole use of behavior-based observational measures could
be unreliable in a CSD context. We identified several facilitators and barriers to inform future
implementation strategies.
Conclusion
Most participants had no objections and all participants found the use of monitoring devices
during CSD feasible and acceptable. We identified a number of facilitators and barriers and
suggested that being aware that care can be improved, good communication, shared decision
making and continuing professional education can overcome the identified barriers. We
suggest future research would focus on developing implementation strategies and guidelines
for introducing objective monitoring devices in diverse palliative care settings.
Key Message
Our study shows attitude towards using monitors during CSD is determined by the view on
CSD, desire for peace of mind, emotional valence attached to using monitors and realizing the
sole use of behavior-based observational measures could be unreliable. The use of monitoring
devices was acceptable to all participants.
Deschepper, Reginald; Vrije Universiteit Brussel - VUB > Public Health > Mental Health and Wellbeing Group
Language :
English
Title :
Attitudes of professional caregivers and family members regarding the use of monitoring devices to improve assessments of pain and discomfort during continuous sedation until death.
Abarshi, E., Rietjens, J., Robijn, L., et al. International variations in clinical practice guidelines for palliative sedation: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 7 (2017), 223–229.
Chambaere, K., Vander Stichele, R., Mortier, F., Cohen, J., Deliens, L., Recent trends in euthanasia and other end-of-life practices in Belgium. N Engl J Med 372 (2015), 1179–1181.
Deschepper, R., Bilsen, J., Laureys, S., Assessment of patient comfort during palliative sedation: is it always reliable?. Annual update in intensive care and emergency medicine 2014, 2014, Springer, Cham, 663–675.
Laureys, S., Schiff, N.D., Coma and consciousness: paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging. Neuroimage 61 (2012), 478–491.
Barbato, M., Bispectral index monitoring in unconscious palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 17 (2001), 102–108.
Masman, A.D., Bispectral index monitoring in terminally ill patients: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage, 52, 2016, 212.
Six, S., Laureys, S., Poelaert, J., et al. Should we include monitors to improve assessment of awareness and pain in unconscious palliatively sedated patients? A case report. Palliat Med 33 (2019), 712–716.
Barbato, M., Barclay, G., Potter, J., Yeo, W., Chung, J., Correlation between observational scales of sedation and comfort and bispectral index scores. J Pain Symptom Manage 54 (2017), 186–193.
Barbato, M., Barclay, G., Potter, J., Yeo, W., Sedation and analgesia in unconscious palliative care patients: can bispectral index monitoring add to our understanding?. J Palliat Care 31 (2015), 57–59.
Six, S., Laureys, S., Poelaert, J., et al. Comfort in palliative sedation (Compas): a transdisciplinary mixed method study protocol for linking objective assessments to subjective experiences. BMC Palliat Care, 17, 2018, 62.
Raus, K., Anquinet, L., Rietjens, J., et al. Factors that facilitate or constrain the use of continuous sedation at the end of life by physicians and nurses in Belgium: results from a focus group study. J Med Ethics 40 (2014), 230–234.
Robijn, L., Cohen, J., Rietjens, J., Deliens, L., Chambaere, K., Trends in continuous deep sedation until death between 2007 and 2013: a repeated nationwide survey. PLoS One, 11, 2016, e0158188.
Cherny, N.I., Radbruch, L., European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med 23 (2009), 581–593.
Charmaz, K., Constructing grounded theory. 2014, SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
Gielen, J., Van den Branden, S., Van Iersel, T., Broeckaert, B., Flemish palliative-care nurses' attitudes to palliative sedation: a quantitative study. Nurs Ethics 19 (2012), 692–704.
van Tol, D.G., Kouwenhoven, P., van der Vegt, B., Weyers, H., Dutch physicians on the role of the family in continuous sedation. J Med Ethics 41 (2015), 240–244.
Bern-Klug, M., Singh, J., Liu, J., Shinkunas, L., Prospect theory concepts applied to family members of nursing home residents with cancer: a good ending is a gain. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care 15 (2019), 34–54.
Hack, T.F., Chochinov, H.M., Hassard, T., et al. Defining dignity in terminally ill cancer patients: a factor-analytic approach. Psychooncology 13 (2004), 700–708.
Guo, Q., Jacelon, C.S., An integrative review of dignity in end-of-life care. Palliat Med 28 (2014), 931–940.
Monreal-Carrillo, E., Allende-Perez, S., Hui, D., García-Salamanca, M.F., Bruera, E., Verástegui, E., Bispectral index monitoring in cancer patients undergoing palliative sedation: a preliminary report. Support Care Cancer 25 (2017), 3143–3149.
Deschepper, R., Laureys, S., Hachimi-Idrissi, S., et al. Palliative sedation: why we should be more concerned about the risks that patients experience an uncomfortable death. Pain, 154, 2013, 1505.
Gambrell, M., Using the BIS monitor in palliative care: a case study. J Neurosci Nurs 37 (2005), 140–143.
Bruinsma, S.M., Rietjens, J.A.C., Seymour, J.E., Anquinet, L., van der Heide, A., The experiences of relatives with the practice of palliative sedation: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 44 (2012), 431–445.
Krooupa, A.-M., Vivat, B., McKeever, S., Marcus, E., Sawyer, J., Stone, P., Identification and evaluation of observational measures for the assessment and/or monitoring of level of consciousness in adult palliative care patients: a systematic review for I-CAN-CARE. Palliat Med 34 (2020), 83–113.
Steinhauser, K.E., Christakis, N.A., Clipp, E.C., et al. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284 (2000), 2476–2482.
Howard, L., Wibberley, C., Crowe, L., Body, R., How events in emergency medicine impact doctors' psychological well-being. Emerg Med J 35 (2018), 595–599.
Masel, E.K., Huber, P., Schur, S., et al. Predicting discharge of palliative care inpatients by measuring their heart rate variability. Ann Palliat Med 3 (2014), 244–249.
Letts, L., Wilkins, S., Law, M.E., et al. Guidelines for critical review form—Qualitative studies (version 2.0). 2007, McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-Based Practice Research Group, Hamilton.