Standardised noxious stimulation-guided individual adjustment of remifentanil target-controlled infusion to prevent haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and surgical incision: A randomised controlled trial.
[en] BACKGROUND: The surgical plethysmographic index (SPI) is one of the available indexes of the nociception-antinociception (NAN) balance. Individually adjusting the NAN balance to prevent somatic responses to noxious stimulation remains a challenge. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether guiding remifentanil administration according to the SPI response to a calibrated noxious stimulus (NANCAL) can blunt the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and surgical incision. DESIGN: Randomised multicentre study. SETTING: Two Belgian university hospitals from January 2014 to April 2015. PATIENTS: After ethic review board approval and informed consent, 48 American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II adult patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to a SPI group, where remifentanil effect-site concentration was adjusted according to NANCAL, or a control group, where it was fixed at 4 ng ml. Propofol concentration was always adjusted to maintain the bispectral index close to 40. NANCAL consisted of a 100 Hz, 60 mA electrical tetanic stimulation during 30 s at the wrist before tracheal intubation and before surgical incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the efficacy of the NANCAL-guided remifentanil administration to prevent the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and surgical incision. The secondary aim was to compare the ability of SPI, analgesia nociception index, pupil diameter and mean arterial pressure response to NANCAL to predict the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and surgical incision. RESULTS: Our SPI response to NANCAL-based correcting scheme for remifentanil administration was not superior to a fixed remifentanil concentration at blunting the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation or surgical incision. Among all tested NAN balance indices, only mean arterial pressure had significant predictive ability with regard to the haemodynamic response to surgical incision. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to define the best NANCAL stimulus and the best remifentanil correcting scheme to help individualised tailoring of antinociception for each specific subpopulation of surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT: 02884310; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02884310.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
DEFRESNE, Aline ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département d'Anesthésie et réanimation > Service d'anesthésie - réanimation
Bonhomme, Vincent ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Département des sciences cliniques
Language :
English
Title :
Standardised noxious stimulation-guided individual adjustment of remifentanil target-controlled infusion to prevent haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and surgical incision: A randomised controlled trial.
Weil G, Passot S, Servin F, et al. Does spectral entropy reflect the response to intubation or incision during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia? Anesth Analg 2008; 106:152-159.
Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:10-23.
Huiku M, Uutela K, van Gils M, et al. Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:447-455.
Barvais L, Engelman E, Eba JM, et al. Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91:347-352.
Logier R, Jeanne M, De Jonckheere, J, et al. PhysioDoloris: A monitoring device for analgesia/nociception balance evaluation using heart rate variability analysis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010:1194- 1197.
Chen X, Thee C, Gruenewald M, et al. Comparison of surgical stress index-guided analgesia with standard clinical practice during routine general anesthesia: A pilot study. Anesthesiology 2010; 112:1175-1183.
Jeanne M, Clément C, De Jonckheere J, et al. Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26:289-294.
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, et al. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:1170-1182.
Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:24-33.
Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith NT. A measure of association for assessing prediction accuracy that is a generalization of nonparametric ROC area. Stat Med 1996; 15:1199-1215.
Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith TN. Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:38-51.
Rantanen M, YppäriläWolters H, van Gils M, et al. Tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve as a predictor of heart rate response to skin incision in propofolremifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:509-513.
Guglielminotti J, Grillot N, Paule M, et al. Prediction of movement to surgical stimulation by the pupillary dilatation reflex amplitude evoked by a standardized noxious test. Anesthesiology 2015; 122:985-993.
Von Dincklage, F, Velten H, Rehberg B, et al. Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during sevoflurane mono-anaesthesia by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104:740-745.
von Dincklage, F, Hackbarth M, Mager R, et al. Monitoring of the responsiveness to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by using RIII reflex threshold and bispectral index. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104:201-208.
Ausems ME, Hug CC, Stanski DR, et al. Plasma concentrations of alfentanil required to supplement nitrous oxide anesthesia for general surgery. Anesthesiology 1986; 65:362-373.
Albertin A, Casati A, Federica L, et al. The effect-site concentration of remifentanil blunting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision during bispectral index-guided propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:125-130.
Struys MM, Vanpeteghem C, Huiku M, et al. Changes in a surgical stress index in response to standardized pain stimuli during propofol-remifentanil infusion. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:359-367.
Gruenewald M, Herz J, Schoenherr T, et al. Measurement of the nociceptive balance by analgesia nociception index and surgical pleth index during sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 2015; 81: 480-489.
Luginbühl M, Reichlin F, Sigurdsson GH, et al. Prediction of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: comparison of laser- Doppler skin vasomotor reflex and pulsed wave reflex. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89:389-397.
Luginbühl M, Rüfenacht M, Korhonen I, et al. Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96:323-329.
Kovac AL. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:63-79.
Geisz-Everson MA, Wren K, Kennedy L. Asystole during laryngoscopy of a patient with pleural and pericardial effusions: A case report. AANA J 2008; 76:25-27.
McDougal DH, Gamlin PD. Autonomic control of the eye. Compr Physiol 2015; 5:439-473.
Larson MD, Sessler DI, Washington DE, et al. Pupillary response to noxious stimulation during isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1993; 76:1072-1078.
Gruenewald M, Ilies C, Herz J, et al. Influence of nociceptive stimulation on analgesia nociception index (ANI) during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110:1024-1030.
Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Ilies C, et al. Influence of different remifentanil concentrations on the performance of the surgical stress index to detect a standardized painful stimulus during sevoflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:586-593.
Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, et al. Relationship between Intraoperative hypotension, defined by either reduction from baseline or absolute thresholds, and acute kidney and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2017; 126:47-65.
Kim JY, Kim DH, Lee AR, et al. Cross-simulation between two pharmacokinetic models for the target-controlled infusion of propofol. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012; 62:309-316.
Bonhomme V, Uutela K, Hans G, et al. Comparison of the surgical Pleth Index with haemodynamic variables to assess nociception-antinociception balance during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106:101-111.
Hans P, Verscheure S, Uutela K, et al. Effect of a fluid challenge on the Surgical Pleth Index uring stable propofol-emifentanil anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:787-796.