On the appropriateness of marginal models for repeated measurements in clinical trials

[en] Although models developed directly to describe marginal distributions have become widespread in the analysis of repeated measurements, some of their disadvantages are not well enough known. These include producing profile curves that correspond to no possible individual, possibly showing that a treatment is superior on average when it is poorer for each individual subject, implicitly generating complex and implausible physiological explanations, including underdispersion in subgroups, and sometimes corresponding to no possible probabilistic data generating mechanism. We conclude that such marginal models may sometimes be appropriate for descriptive observational studies, such as sample surveys in epidemiology, but should only be used with great care in causal experimental settings, such as clinical trials.

Disciplines :

Mathematics

Author, co-author :

Lindsey, James ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Institut des sciences humaines et sociales > Institut des sciences humaines et sociales

Lambert, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Institut des sciences humaines et sociales > Méthodes quantitatives en sciences sociales

Language :

English

Title :

On the appropriateness of marginal models for repeated measurements in clinical trials

Publication date :

1998

Journal title :

Statistics in Medicine

ISSN :

0277-6715

eISSN :

1097-0258

Publisher :

John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States - New Jersey

Volume :

Pages :

447-469

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/3116/abstract

Available on ORBi :

since 29 September 2009

Statistics

Number of views

108 (6 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

8 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

115

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

112

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

132

Bibliography

Zeger, S. L., Liang, K. Y. and Albert, P. S. 'Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach', Biometrics, 44, 1049-1060 (1988).
Urbain, J. P. Exogeneity in Error Correction Models, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
Liang, K. Y., Zeger, S. L. and Qaquish, B. 'Multivariate regression for categorical data', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 3-40 (1992).
Diggle, P. J., Liang, K. Y. and Zeger, S. L. Analysis of Longitudinal Data, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.
Simpson, C. H. 'The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 233-241 (1951).
Kenward, M. G. and Jones, B. 'The analysis of binary and categorical data from crossover trials', Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3, 325-344, (1994).
Robinson, W. S. 'Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals', American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357 (1950).
Cox, D. R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A. E., Gore, S. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J. and Jones, D. R. 'Quality-of-life assessment: can we keep it simple?', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 155, 353-393 (1992).
Lindsey, J. K. Parametric Statistical Inference, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996.
Lindsey, J. K. Models for Repeated Measurements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
Agresti, A. 'A survey of models for repeated ordered categorical response data', Statistics in Medicine, 8, 1209-1224 (1989).
Sheiner, L. B., Beal, S. L. and Sambol, N. C. 'Study designs for dose-ranging', Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeautics, 46, 63-77 (1989).
Grömping, U. 'Subject-specific and population-averaged questions for log-linear regression data', in Seeber, G. U. H., Francis, B. J., Hatzinger, R. and Steckel-Berger, G. (eds), Statistical Modelling, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995, pp. 125-132.
West, M., Harrison, P. J. and Migon, H. S. 'Dynamic generalized linear models and Bayesian forecasting', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 73-97 (1985).
Lambert, P. 'Modelling of repeated series of count data measured at unequally spaced times', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 45, 31-38 (1996).
Aalen, O. O. 'Heterogeneity in survival analysis', Statistics in Medicine, 7, 1121-1137 (1988).
Hougaard, P. 'Life table methods for heterogeneous populations: distributions describing the heterogeneity', Biometrika, 71, 75-84 (1984).
Hougaard, P. 'Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions', Biometrika, 73, 387-396 (1986).
Vaupel, J. W. and Yashin, A. I. 'Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics', American Statistician, 39, 176-185 (1985).
Blossfeld, H. P. and Hamerle, A. 'Unobserved heterogeneity in event history models', Quality and Quantity, 26, 157-168 (1992).
Cuzick, J. Edwards, R. and Segnan, N. 'Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials', Statistics in Medicine, 16, 1017-1029 (1997).
Smith, H. F. 'Interpretation of adjusted treatment means and regressions in analysis of covariance', Biometrics, 13, 282-308 (1957).
Rosenbaum, P. R. 'The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant vanable that has been affected by the treatment', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 147, 656-666 (1984).
Lindsey, J. K. The Analysis of Stochastic Processes Using GLIM, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.
Hendry, D. Dynamic Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
Davidian, M. and Giltinan, D. M. Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurements, Chapman and Hall, London, 1995.
Dale, J. R. Global cross-ratio models for bivariate, discrete, ordered responses', Biometrics, 42, 909-917 (1986).
le Cessie, S. and van Houwelingen, J. C. 'Logistic regression for correlated binary data', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 43, 95-108 (1944).
George, E. O. and Bowman, D. 'A full likelihood procedure for analyzing exchangeable binary data', Biometrics, 51, 512-523 (1995).
Azzalini, A. 'Logistic regression for autocorrelated data with application to repeated measures', Biometrika, 81, 767-775 (1995).
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G. and Hunter, J. S. Statistics for Experiments, Wiley, New York, 1978.
Arnold, B. C. and Strauss, D. J. 'Bivariate distributions with conditionals in prescribed exponential families', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 522-527 (1991).
Zhao, L. P. and Prentice, R. L. 'Correlated binary regression using a quadratic exponential model', Biometrika, 77, 642-648 (1990).
Fitzmaurice, G. M. and Laird, N. M. 'A likelihood-based method for analyzing lontigudinal binary responses', Biometrika, 80, 141-151 (1993).
Gilmour, A. R., Anderson, R. D. and Rae, A. L. The analysis of binomial data by a generalized linear mixed model', Biometrika, 72, 593-599 (1985).
Zeger, S. L. and Liang, K. Y. 'Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes', Biometrics, 42, 121-130 (1986).
Liang, K. Y. and Zeger, S. L. 'Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models', Biometrika, 73, 13-22 (1986).
McCullagh, P. and Neider, J. A. Generalized Linear Models, Chapman and Hall, London, 1989.
Lipsitz, S. R. 'Book review. Models for Repeated Measurements, by J. K. Lindsey', Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1124-1125 (1995).
Crowder, M. 'On the use of a working correlation matrix in using generalized linear models for repeated measures', Biometrika, 82, 407-410 (1995).
Pepe, M. S. and Anderson, G. L. 'A cautionary note on inference for marginal regression models with longitudinal data and general correlated response data', Communications in Statistics, Series B, 23, 939-951 (1994).
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M. and Rotnitzky, A. G. 'Regression models for discrete longitudinal responses', Statistical Science, 8, 284-309 (1993).
Lesaffre, E., Molenberghs, G. and Dewulf, L. 'Effect of dropouts in a longitudinal study: an application of a repeated ordinal model', Statistics in Medicine, 15, 1123-1141 (1996).