Article (Scientific journals)
Continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in intensive care patients: impact on mortality and renal recovery.
Truche, Anne-Sophie; Darmon, Michael; Bailly, Sebastien et al.
2016In Intensive Care Medicine, 42 (9), p. 1408-17
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
PUBMED 25 - Truche2016_Article_ContinuousRenalReplacementTher.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.32 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Acute Kidney Injury/mortality/therapy; Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis/adverse effects/mortality; Renal Replacement Therapy/mortality; Treatment Outcome; Acute kidney injury; Intensive care unit; Marginal structural model; Renal replacement therapy
Abstract :
[en] PURPOSE: The best renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality remains controversial. We compared mortality and short- and long-term renal recovery between patients treated with continuous RRT and intermittent hemodialysis. METHODS: Patients of the prospective observational multicenter cohort database OUTCOMEREA were included if they underwent at least one RRT session between 2004 and 2014. Differences in patients' baseline and daily characteristics between treatment groups were taken into account by using a marginal structural Cox model, allowing one to substantially reduce the bias resulting from confounding factors in observational longitudinal data analysis. The composite primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and dialysis dependency. RESULTS: Among 1360 included patients with RRT, 544 (40.0 %) and 816 (60.0 %) were initially treated by continuous RRT and intermittent hemodialysis, respectively. At day 30, 39.6 % patients were dead. Among survivors, 23.8 % still required RRT. There was no difference between groups for the primary endpoint in global population (HR 1.00, 95 % CI 0.77-1.29; p = 0.97). In patients with higher weight gain at RRT initiation, mortality and dialysis dependency were significantly lower with continuous RRT (HR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.29-0.99; p = 0.05). Conversely, this technique appeared to be deleterious in patients without shock (HR 2.24, 95 % CI 1.24-4.04; p = 0.01). Six-month mortality and persistent renal dysfunction were not influenced by the RRT modality in patients with dialysis dependence at ICU discharge. CONCLUSION: Continuous RRT did not appear to improve 30-day and 6-month patient outcomes. It seems beneficial for patients with fluid overload, but might be deleterious in the absence of hemodynamic failure.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Truche, Anne-Sophie
Darmon, Michael
Bailly, Sebastien
Clec'h, Christophe
Dupuis, Claire
Misset, Benoît ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Autres Services Médicaux > Service de Soins Intensifs
Azoulay, Elie
Schwebel, Carole
Bouadma, Lila
Kallel, Hatem
Adrie, Christophe
Dumenil, Anne-Sylvie
Argaud, Laurent
Marcotte, Guillaume
Jamali, Samir
Zaoui, Philippe
Laurent, Virginie
Goldgran-Toledano, Dany
Sonneville, Romain
Souweine, Bertrand
Timsit, Jean-Francois
More authors (11 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in intensive care patients: impact on mortality and renal recovery.
Publication date :
2016
Journal title :
Intensive Care Medicine
ISSN :
0342-4642
eISSN :
1432-1238
Publisher :
Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
Volume :
42
Issue :
9
Pages :
1408-17
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 21 February 2020

Statistics


Number of views
57 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
86
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
69
OpenCitations
 
79

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi