Article (Scientific journals)
Equation models developed with bioelectric impedance analysis tools to assess muscle mass: A systematic review.
Beaudart, Charlotte; Bruyère, Olivier; Geerinck, Anton et al.
2020In Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 35, p. 47-62
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Equation models developed with bioelectric impedance anamlysis tools to assess muscle mass. a systematic review.pdf
Publisher postprint (845.24 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Bioelectrical impedance analysis; Equations; Muscle mass
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND & AIMS: This systematic review aims to systematically assess and summarize the equation models developed to estimate muscle mass with bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) instruments against a reference instrument (DXA, MRI, CT-scan, Ultrasonography), in order to help researchers and clinicians choose the most adapted equation, depending on the device and the population in question. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed. Medline (via Ovid) and Scopus were searched in January 2019 for observational (transversal, longitudinal, retrospective) studies developing an equation prediction model to validate BIA against another reference method for the assessment of muscle mass. Study selection and data extraction was performed independently by two researchers. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. RESULTS: 25 studies matched the inclusion criteria and were included in the present systematic review. Among them, 10 studies proposed an equation for subjects aged 65 years and older, 9 for adults, 4 for infants and 2 did not report the age of the population. A large heterogeneity was observed regarding the brand and type of BIA as well as the administration protocol (mode, frequency, number of electrodes, administration position and empty bladder/stomach or not). Most of the studies used DXA as the reference instrument, except 4 that used MRI. In each of the included papers authors provided, through simple or multiple regression, a predictive equation for muscle mass. BIA resistance index, sex, weight, age, BIA reactance and height were most frequently included as predictive variables. The majority of the equations developed explained more than 80% of the variance between both instruments. Out of the 25 equations available, only 9 were also validated in another population within the same paper. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of the literature offers clinicians and researchers the opportunity to verify the existence of a prediction equation when using a BIA device for estimating muscle mass. This will help them to obtain a valid estimation of muscle mass in a specific population and with a specific instrument. If the equation exists and has been validated by a study free of high risk of bias, it's use is recommended because the development of a new equation in the same context seems redundant and undesirable. If a validation has not been carried out for a specific brand of BIA, reference method or population, we recommend the development and cross-validation of a new equation.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Beaudart, Charlotte ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Bruyère, Olivier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Geerinck, Anton ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Hajaoui, Manon 
Scafoglieri, Aldo
Perkisas, Stany
Bautmans, Ivan
Gielen, Evelien
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Buckinx, Fanny  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Département des sciences de la santé publique
Language :
English
Title :
Equation models developed with bioelectric impedance analysis tools to assess muscle mass: A systematic review.
Publication date :
2020
Journal title :
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
eISSN :
2405-4577
Publisher :
Elsevier, United Kingdom
Volume :
35
Pages :
47-62
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Copyright (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Available on ORBi :
since 20 February 2020

Statistics


Number of views
94 (15 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
11 (9 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
62
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
61
OpenCitations
 
25
OpenAlex citations
 
74

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi