Ágel, V., Eichinger, L. M., Eroms, H.-W., Hellwig, P., Heringer, H. J., & Lobin, H. (Eds.). (2003). Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research (Vol. 1). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110141900.1
Becker, C. (1932). The heavenly city of the 18th-century philosophers. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Billroth, J. G. F. (1832). Lateinische Syntax für die obern Klassen gelehrter Schulen. Leipzig: Weidmann.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.
Bohnet, B. (2010). Top accuracy and fast dependency parsing is not a contradiction. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010) (pp. 89-97). Beijing.
Brassai, S. (1873). Paraleipomena kai diorthoumena. A mit nem mondtak s a mit roszul mondtak a commentatorok Virg. Aeneise II. könyvére. [What the commentators did not say or wrongly said about Book II of Virgil's Aeneid]. Budapest: MTA.
Bresnan, J., Asudeh, A., Toivonen, I., & Wechsler, S. (2015). Lexical Functional Syntax (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119105664
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Clark, S. W. (1847). Science of English language. A practical grammar: in which words, phrases, and sentences are classified according to their offices, and their relations to each other. Illustrated by a complete system of diagrams. New York: A. S. Barnes.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
Dancygier, B. (Ed.). (2017). The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732
de Marneffe, M.-C., & Manning, C. D. (2008). The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In Coling 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation (pp. 1-8). Manchester. https://doi.org/10.3115/1608858.1608859
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111-137). Seoul: Hanshin.
Fillmore, C. (1988). The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 35-55). Berkeley, CA: BLS.
Geeraerts, D. (2008). Introduction: A rough guide to cognitive linguistics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 1-28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gerdes, K., Hajičová, E., & Wanner, L. (2011). Introduction. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling) (pp. iii-iiv). Barcelona.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Haegeman, L. (1999). An introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hajič, J., Böhmová, A., Hajičová, E., & Vidová Hladká, B. (2000). The Prague Dependency Treebank: A three-level annotation scenario. In A. Abeillé (Ed.), Treebanks: Building and using parsed corpora (pp. 103-127). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hudson, R. (2007). Language networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hudson, R. (2008). Word Grammar and Construction Grammar. In G. Trousdale & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 257-302). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199178.3.257
Ihm, P., & Lecerf, Y. (1963). Éléments pour une grammaire générale des langues projectives. European Atomic Energy Community, Joint Nuclear Research Center, Ispra Establishment (Italy), Scientific Data Processing Center.
Imrényi, A. (2013). Constituency or dependency? Notes on Sámuel Brassai's syntactic model of Hungarian. In P. Szigetvári (Ed.), Lxx. Papers Presented to László Varga on his 70th Birthday (pp. 167-182). Budapest: Tinta. Retrieved from
Imrényi, A. (2017). Form-meaning correspondences in multiple dimensions: The structure of Hungarian finite clauses. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2), 287-319.
Jespersen, O. (1937). Analytic syntax. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.
Kahane, S. (2004). Grammaires d'unification polarisées. In Actes TALN 2004 (pp. 233-242). Fes.
Kahane, S. (2009). On the status of phrases in head-driven sentence grammar structure - Illustration by a totally lexical treatment of extraction. In Polguère & Mel'čuk, 2009, pp. 111-150.
Kahane, S., & Lareau, F. (2005). Grammaire d'unification sens-texte: Modularité et polarisation. In Actes TALN 2005 (pp. 23-32). Dourdan.
Kahane, S., & Mazziotta, N. (2015). Syntactic polygraphs. A formalism extending both constituency and dependency. In Proceedings of the 14th Meeting on the Mathematics of Language (MoL 2015) (pp. 152-164). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-2313
Kiss, T., & Alexiadou, A. (2015). Syntax - Theory and analysis. An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Koch, P. (2003). Metataxe bei Lucien Tesnière. In Ágel et al., 2003, pp. 144-159.
Koerner, K. (1976). Towards a historiography of linguistics. 19th and 20th century paradigms. in H. Parret (Ed.). History of Linguistic Thought (685-718). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 1): Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1994). Structural syntax: The view from cognitive grammar. Sémiotiques 6-7, 69-84.
Lecerf, Y. (1961). Une représentation algébrique de la structure des phrases dans diverses langues naturelles. C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris 252, 232-234.
Lemaréchal, A. (1989). Les parties du discours. Paris: PUF.
Lemaréchal, A. (1997). Zéro(s). Paris: PUF.
Maxwell, D. (2013). Why so many nodes? In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling) (pp. 197-206). Prague.
Mazziotta, N. (2014). Nature et structure des relations syntaxiques dans le modèle de Lucien Tesnière. Modèles Linguistiques 69, 123-152.
Mazziotta, N. (2016). Drawing syntax before syntactic trees. Stephen Watkins Clark's sentence diagrams (1847). Historiographia Linguistica, 43(3), 301-342.
Mazziotta, N. (Forthcoming 2019). The evolution of spatial rationales in Tesnière's stemma. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling).
Mazziotta, N., & Kahane, S. (2017). To what extent is Immediate Constituency Analysis dependency-based? A survey of foundational texts. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017) (pp. 116-126). Pisa.
Mazziotta, N., & Kahane, S. (Forthcoming 2019). L'émergence de la syntaxe structurale de Lucien Tesnière. In C. Mathieu & V. Bisconti (Eds.), Entre vie et théorie. La biographie des linguistes dans l'histoire des sciences du langage. Limoges: Lambert Lucas.
Mel'čuk, I. (2009). Dependency in natural language. In Polguère & Mel'čuk, 2009, pp. 1-110.
Mel'čuk, I. (1988). Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Nida, E. (1946). Morphology: the descriptive analysis of words. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Nivre, J., Hall, J., Kübler, S., McDonald, R., Nilsson, J., Riedel, S., & Yuret, D. (2007). The CoNLL 2007 Shared Task on Dependency Parsing. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL) (pp. 915-932). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Osborne, T. (2006). Shared material and grammar: Toward a dependency grammar theory of non-gapping coordination for English and German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 25, 39-93. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs.2006.002
Osborne, T. (2013). A look at tesnière's Éléments through the lens of modern syntactic theory. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling) (pp. 262-271). Prague.
Osborne, T. (2015). Dependency grammar. In Kiss & Alexiadou, 2015, pp. 1027-1045.
Osborne, T., & Gerdes, K. (2019). The status of function words in dependency grammar: A critique of Universal Dependencies (UD). Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.537
Osborne, T., & Groß, T. 2012. Constructions are catenae: Construction grammar meets dependency grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 23(1), 165-216. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0006
Owens, J. (1988). The Foundations of Grammar: An Introduction to Medieval Arabic Grammatical Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Owens, J. (2015). Arabic syntactic research. In Kiss & Alexiadou 2015: 220-295.
Polguère, A., & Mel'čuk, I. (Eds.). (2009). Dependency in linguistic description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.111
Pollard C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Raster, P. (2015). The Indian grammatical tradition. In Kiss & Alexiadou 2015: 295-389.
Robinson, J. J. (1970). Dependency structures and transformational rules. Language, 46, 259-285.
Schubert, K. (1987). Metataxis. Contrastive dependency syntax for machine translation. Dordrecht: Foris.
Schubert, K. (2003). Metataxe: Ein Dependenzmodell für die computerlinguistische Praxis. In Ágel et al., 2003, pp. 636-660.
Seuren, P. A. M. (2015). Prestructuralist and structuralist approaches to syntax. In Kiss & Alexiadou, 2015, pp. 391-457.
Ten'er [= Tesnière], L. (1988). Osnovy strukturnogo sintaksisa (Transl. by V. G. Gaka). Moskva: Progress (Transl. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck, 1959).
Tesnière, L. (1980). Übersetzung der Éléments de syntaxe structurale. (Transl. by U. Engel). Stutgart (Transl. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck, 1966, 2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1959).
Tesnière, L. (1994). Elementos de sintaxis estructural. (Trans. by U. Engel). Madrid: Gredos (Trans. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck, 1966, 2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1959).
Tesnière, L. (2001). Elementi di sintassi strutturale (Trans. by G. Proverbio & A. Trocini Cerrina). Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier (Trans. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck, 1966, 2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1959).
Tesnière, L. (2015). Elements of structural syntax (Trans. by T. Osborne & S. Kahane). Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Trans. of Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck, 1966, 2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1959).
Žolkovskij, A. K., & Mel'čuk, I. (1965). O vozmožnom metode i instrumentax semantičeskogo sinteza [On a possible method and instruments for semantic synthesis]. Naučno-texničeskaja informacija 5, 23-28.
