[en] In preclinical and clinical experiments, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are designed to analyse the
evolution of drug concentration in plasma over time i.e. the PK profile. Some PK parameters are
estimated in order to summarize the complete drug’s kinetic profile: area under the curve (AUC),
maximal concentration (Cmax), time at which the maximal concentration occurs (tmax) and half-life
time (t1/2).
Several methods have been proposed to estimate these PK parameters. A first method relies on
interpolating between observed concentrations. The interpolation method is often chosen linear. This
method is simple and fast. Another method relies on compartmental modelling. In this case, nonlinear
methods are used to estimate parameters of a chosen compartmental model. This method provides
generally good results. However, if the data are sparse and noisy, two difficulties can arise with this
method. The first one is related to the choice of the suitable compartmental model given the small
number of data available in preclinical experiment for instance. Second, nonlinear methods can fail to
converge. Much work has been done recently to circumvent these problems (J. Pharmacokinet.
Pharmacodyn. 2007; 34:229–249, Stat. Comput., to appear, Biometrical J., to appear, ESAIM P&S
2004; 8:115–131).
In this paper, we propose a Bayesian nonparametric model based on P-splines. This method
provides good PK parameters estimation, whatever be the number of available observations and the
level of noise in the data. Simulations show that the proposed method provides better PK parameters
estimations than the interpolation method, both in terms of bias and precision. The Bayesian nonparametric method provides also better AUC and t1/2 estimations than a correctly specified
compartmental model, whereas this last method performs better in tmax and Cmax estimations.
We extend the basic model to a hierarchical one that treats the case where we have concentrations
from different subjects. We are then able to get individual PK parameter estimations. Finally, with
Bayesian methods, we can get easily some uncertainty measures by obtaining credibility sets for each
PK parameter.
Disciplines :
Mathematics Pharmacy, pharmacology & toxicology
Author, co-author :
Jullion, Astrid
Lambert, Philippe ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Institut des sciences humaines et sociales > Méthodes quantitatives en sciences sociales
Beck, Benoit
Vandenhende, François
Language :
English
Title :
Pharmacokinetic parameters estimation using adaptive Bayesian P-splines models
Publication date :
2009
Journal title :
Pharmaceutical Statistics
ISSN :
1539-1604
eISSN :
1539-1612
Publisher :
John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States - New Jersey
Volume :
8
Pages :
98-112
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Name of the research project :
IAP research network nr. P5/24
Funders :
Belgian State (Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs)
Commentary :
Astrid Jullion thanks Eli Lilly for the financial
support through a patronage research grant and
the UCL for an FSR research grant
Vandenhende F, Comblain M, Delsemme M-H et al. Construction of an optimal destructive sampling design for noncompartmental auc estimation. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1999; 27:191-212. (Pubitemid 29484769)
Nedelman J, Jia X. An extension of Satterthwaite's approximation applied to pharmacokinetics. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1998; 8:317-328. (Pubitemid 28239874)
Bailer A. Testing for the equality of area under the curves when using destructive measurement techniques. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1988; 16:303-309. (Pubitemid 18192401)
Lavielle M, Mentré F. Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir in HIV patients and covariate analysis with the SAEM algorithm. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 2007; 34:229-249. (Pubitemid 46536259)
Lavielle M, Meza C. A parameter expansion version of the SAEM algorithm. Statistics and Computing 2007; 17:121-130.
Meza C, Jaffrezic F, Foulley J. REML estimation of variance parameters in non linear mixed effects models using the SAEM algorithm. The Biometrical Journal 2007; 49:876-888.
Kuhn E, Lavielle M. Coupling a stochastic approximation version of EM with a MCMC procedure. ESAIM P&S 2004; 8:115-131. (Pubitemid 40205142)
Westlake W. Use of statistical methods in evaluation of in vivo performance of dosage forms. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1973; 62:1579-1589.
Cochetto D, Wargin W, Crow J. Pitfalls and valid approaches to pharmacokinetic analysis of mean concentration data following intravenous administration. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1980; 8:539-552. (Pubitemid 11097016)
Yeh K, Small R. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of stable piecewise cubic polynomials as numerical integration functions. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1989; 17:721-739. (Pubitemid 20162871)
Piegorsch ABW. Estimating integrals using quadrature methods with an application in pharmacokinetics. Biometrics 1990; 46:1201-1211.
Purves R. Bias and variance of extrapolated tails for area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-themoment-curve (aumc). Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1992; 20:211-226. (Pubitemid 23034412)
Yu Z, Tse F. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of stable piecewise cubic polynomials as numerical integration functions. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 1989; 17:721-739.
Lee M, Poon W-Y, Kingdon H. A two-phase linear regression model for biologic half-life data. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 1990; 115:745-748. (Pubitemid 20213166)
Wright J, Boddy A. All half-lifes are wrong but some half-lifes are useful. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2001; 40:237-244. (Pubitemid 32458151)
Kowalski K. An algorithm for estimating the terminal half-life in pharmacokinetic studies. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1994; 42:119-126. (Pubitemid 24095341)
Yuan J. Estimation of variance for auc in animal studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1993; 82:761-763. (Pubitemid 23315700)
Tang-Liu D-S, Burke P. The effect of azone on ocular levobunolol absorption: calculating the area under the curve and its standard error using tissue sampling compartments. Pharmarceutical Research 1988; 5:238-241. (Pubitemid 18115341)
Nedelman J, Gibiansky E. The variance of a better AUC estimator for sparse, destructive sampling in toxicokinetcs. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1996; 85:884-886. (Pubitemid 26269487)
Yeh C. Estimation and significant tests of area under the curve derived from incomplete blood sampling. American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Biopharmaceutical Section 1990; 74-81.
Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1997.
Eilers PHC, Marx BD. Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties (with discussion). Statistical Science 1996; 11:89-121.
Wahba G, Wold S. A completely automatic French curve: fitting spline function by cross validation. Communications in Statistics 1975; 4:1-18.
Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974; 19:716-723.
Lang S, Brezger A. Bayesian P-splines. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 2004; 13:183-212.
Jullion A, Lambert P. Robust specification of the roughness penalty prior distribution in spatially adaptative bayesian p-splines models. Journal of Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2007; 51:2542-2558. (Pubitemid 44751263)
Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics. Marcel Dekker: New York, 1982.
Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC: London, UK/Boca Raton, FL, 1996.
Casella G, George E. Explaining the Gibbs sampler. The American Statistician 1992; 46:167-174.
Ihaka R, Gentleman R. A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996; 5:299-314.
Antoniadis A, Grégoire G, McKeague IW. Bayesian estimation in single-index models. Statistica Sinica 2004; 14:1147-1164.