Confirmatory factor analysis of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of French-Speaking adolescents

D'Acremont, Mathieu; Van der Linden, Martial

doi:10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.1

Article (Scientific journals)

Confirmatory factor analysis of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of French-Speaking adolescents

D'Acremont, Mathieu; Van der Linden, Martial

2008 • In European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24 (1), p. 1-8

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/243276

DOI
10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.1

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

ConfirmatoryFactorAnalysisSdqAdolescents-1.pdf

Publisher postprint (130.71 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Adolescence; Behavior assessment; Confirmatory factor analysis; Construct validity; Measurement invariance; Scale validation

Abstract :

[en] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) assesses adaptive and problematic behavior in children and adolescents (Goodman, 1997). The aim of this study was to test the construct validity of a French translation of the scale. Teachers completed the SDQ for their pupils (279 girls and 278 boys, 13-18 years). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the SDQ supported the original distinction between Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, Peer problems, Emotional symptoms, and Prosocial behavior. Multigroup CFA revealed invariance of factor measurement across gender. In addition, boys had higher factor scores for Conduct problems, Hyperactivity/Inattention, and Peer problems whereas girls were more Prosocial. The internal reliability of the subscales ranges from acceptable to very good. These results indicate that the French version of the SDQ has a reliable factor organization among adolescent boys and girls. © 2008 Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Disciplines :

Neurosciences & behavior

Author, co-author :

D'Acremont, Mathieu; Université de Genève - UNIGE > Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences

Van der Linden, Martial ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Département de Psychologie

Language :

English

Title :

Confirmatory factor analysis of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of French-Speaking adolescents

Publication date :

2008

Journal title :

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

ISSN :

1015-5759

eISSN :

2151-2426

Publisher :

Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, United States - Massachusetts

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

1-8

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 16 January 2020

Statistics

Number of views

50 (5 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

d'Acremont, M., & Van der Linden, M. (2007). Memory for angry faces, impulsivity, and problematic behavior in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 313-324.
Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist: 4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W.W. (2005). Simulation study of fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41-75.
Capron, C., Thérond, C., & Duyme, M. (2007). Psychometric properties of the French version of the self-reported and teacher Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 79-88.
Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
Dickey, W.C., & Blumberg, S.J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1159-1167.
Fisher, R.A. (1915). Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10, 507-521.
Fombonne, E., d'Acremont, M., Van der Linden, M., Capron, C., Maufroy, M., & Proust, L. (2005). Questionnaire Points forts - Points faibles [Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Onesided informant-rated version for teachers and parents of 4-16 year olds]. Retrieved March 2005 from http://www.sdqinfo.com.
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337-1345.
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586.
Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, 125-130.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
Jöreskog, K.G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202.
Kashala, E., Elgen, I., Sommerfelt, K., & Tylleskar, T. (2005). Teacher ratings of mental health among school children in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 14, 208-215.
Kelloway, E.K. (1995). Structural equation modelling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 215-224.
Marzocchi, G.M., Capron, C., Di-Pietro, M., Tauleria, E.D., Duyme, M., Frigerio, A. et al. (2004). The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13,1140-1146.
Meltzer, H., Gatward, R., Goodman, R., & Ford, T. (2000). Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. Retrieved September 2006 from http://www.sdqinfo.com/b8.html. London: The Stationery Office.
Mellor, D., & Stokes, M. (2007). The factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 79-88.
Muris, P., Meesters, C., & van den Berg, F. (2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 1-8.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2006). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
Patterson, G.R., DeGarmo, D.S., & Knutson, N. (2000). Hyper-active and antisocial behaviors: Comorbid or two points in the same process. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 91-106.
R Development Core Team. (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 2.3.0) [computer software]. Retrieved May 2006 from http://www.r-project.org. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Raines-Eudy, R. (2000). Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 124-141.
Raykov, T. (1998). On the use of confirmatory factor analysis in personality research. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 291-293.
Ripley, K., & Yuill, N. (2005). Patterns of langage impairment and behaviour in boys excluded form school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 37-50.
Rønning, J.A., Handegaard, B.H., Sourander, A., & Mørch, W.-T. (2004). The Strengths and Difficulties self-report questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 73-82.
Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R., & Rubin, D. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlation approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schafer, J.L., & Graham, J.W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
Scourfield, J., Van den Bree, M., Martin, N., & McGuffin, P. (2004). Conduct problems in children and adolescents: A twin study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 489-496.
Smedje, H., Broman, J.E., Hetta, J., & von Knorring, A.L. (1999). Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 63-70.
Smith, P.K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P., & Chauhan, P. (2004). Profiles of nonvictims, escaped victims, continuing victims, and new victims of school bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 565-581.
Van Leeuwen, K., Meerschaert, T., Bosmans, G., De Medts, L., & Braet, C. (2006). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 189-197.
Vostanis, P. (2006). Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Research and clinical applications. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 19, 367-372.
Widaman, K.F., & Reise, S.P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance-use domain. In K.J. Bryant, M., Windle, & S.G., West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-324). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Woerner, W., Becker, A., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 3-10.