[en] The inhibition of a prepotent response represents a hallmark of executive (or cognitive) control, allowing individuals to adapt to the ever-changing environment. This ability can be studied with the stop-signal paradigm, in which "go" processes (execution of the response) and "stop" processes (inhibition of the response) compete against each other. This competition leads to proactive and reactive response-strategy adjustments in order to balance between speed and caution. These adjustments have been studied intensively in adult samples; however, few studies had explored these adjustments from a developmental perspective. Therefore, 107 children aged from 6 to 12 years old were given a stop-signal task in which we distinguished proactive (delaying response) from reactive (post-error slowing) adjustments in order to study developmental trends in the inhibition of a prepotent response, as well as proactive and reactive response-strategy adjustments. Developmental improvement in inhibition of a prepotent response and proactive adjustment abilities were observed, whereas reactive response-strategy adjustment remained stable during the age span studied here. These results replicated and extended previous knowledge about the development of cognitive control.
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Urben, Sébastien; Child Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland, Research Unit, University Service of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Rue du Bugnon 25A, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
Barisnikov, Koviljka; Child Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Van der Linden, Martial ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Département de Psychologie
Language :
English
Title :
Inhibition of a prepotent response and response-strategy adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm: A developmental study
Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist, 13, 214-228. doi:10.1177/1073858407299288.
Band, G. P., van der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2003). Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica, 112, 105-142. doi:S0001691802000793.
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65-94. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65.
Bedard, A. C., Nichols, S., Barbosa, J. A., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (2002). The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21, 93-111. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN2101-5.
Bissett, P. G., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Balancing cognitive demands: Control adjustments in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 37, 392-404. doi: 10.1037/a0021800.
Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The Evolution of InhibitionMechanisms and Their Role in Human Cognition and Behavior. In F. N. Dempster & H. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 141-173). London: Academic Press, Inc.
Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A.Miyake & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation inWorkingMemory (pp. 76-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., & Munakata, Y. (2009). Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science USA, 106, 5529-5533. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810002106.
Ciesielski, K. T., & Harris, R. J. (1997). Factors related to performance failure on executive tasks in autism. Child Neuropsychology, 3, 1-12. doi:10.1080/09297049708401364.
Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental change in a basic processing dimension. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging Themes in Cognitive Development, Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 3-27). New York: Springer-Verlag.
de Frias, C. M., Dixon, R. A., & Strauss, E. (2006). Structure of four executive functioning tests in healthy older adults. Neuropsychology, 20, 206-214. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.206.
Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of Frontal Lobe Function (pp. 466-503). New York: Oxford University Press.
Huizinga, M., Dolan, C. V., & van der Molen, M. W. (2006). Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2017-2036. doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2006.01.010.
Largo, R. H., Pfister, D., Molinari, L., Kundu, S., Lipp, A., & Duc, G. (1989). Significance of prenatal, perinatal and postnatal factors in the development of AGA preterm infants at five to seven years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 440-456. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb04022. x.
Li, C. S., Chao, H. H., & Lee, T. W. (2009). Neural correlates of speeded as compared with delayed responses in a stop signal task: An indirect analog of risk taking and association with an anxiety trait. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 839-848. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn132.
Logan, G. D. (1985). Exectuvie control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193-210. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90055-1.
Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory, and Language (pp. 189-239). London: Academic Press, Inc.
Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563. doi: 0096-1523/86/100.75.
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-237. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295.
Lorsbach, T. C., & Reimer, J. F. (2011). Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 138-147. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02011.x
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
Munakata, Y., Snyder, H. R., & Chatham, C. H. (2012). Developing Cognitive Control: Three Key Transitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 71-77. doi:10.1177/0963721412436807.
Nestor, P. G., & O'Donnell, B. F. (1998). The mind adrift: Attentional dysregulation in schizophrenia. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The Attentive Brain (pp. 527-546). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
Ornstein, T. J., Levin, H. S., Chen, S., Hanten, G., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Dennis, M., . . . Schachar, R. (2009). Performance monitoring in children following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 506-513. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01997.x.
Rabbitt, P. M. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272. doi: 10.1037/h0022853
Raven, J. C., Court, J.H., & Raven, J. (1998). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Band, G. P., & Logan, G. D. (1999). A study of adaptative behavior: effect of age and irrelevant information on the ability to inhibit one's actions. Acta Psychologica, 101, 315-337. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00010-4
Schachar, R., Chen, S., Logan, G. D., Ornstein, T. J., Crosbie, J., Ickowicz, A., & Pakulak, A. (2004). Evidence for an error monitoring deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 285-293. doi: 0091-0627/04/0600-0285/0.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461-479.
Thatcher, R. W. (1991). Maturation of the human frontal lobes: Physiological evidence for staging. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 397-419. doi:10.1080/87565649109540500
Tillman, C. M., Thorell, L. B., Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2008). Motor response inhibition and execution in the stop-signal task: development and relation to ADHD behaviors. Child Neuropsychology, 14, 42-59. doi: 10.1080/09297040701249020.
Urben, S., Van der Linden, M., & Barisnikov, K. (2011). Development of the Ability to Inhibit a Prepotent Response: Influence ofWorkingMemory and Processing Speed. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 981-998. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02037.x
van den Wildenberg, W. P., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 201-220. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.003.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008a). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649-672. doi: 10.1037/a0013170.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008b). Long-term aftereffects of response inhibition: Memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1229-1235. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1229.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009a). Models of response inhibition in the stopsignal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 647-661. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009b). Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 835-854. doi:10.1037/a0012726.
Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2008). Shortterm aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 413-426. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.413.
Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., & Roeyers, H. (2007). Developmental changes in error monitoring: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1649-1657. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.004.
Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205-213. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.205.
