Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, Jourdan C, Ghout I, Bosserelle V, Azerad S, Weiss JJ, Joel ME, Aegerter P, Azouvi P. Predictors of informal care burden 1 year after a severe traumatic brain injury: Results from the PariS-TBI study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2013; 28: 408-418
Mosconi P, Taricco M, Bergamini M, Bosisio Fazzi L, Colombo C, Patrucco V, Corti M, Giobbe D, Guerreschi M, Magnarella MR, et al. Family burden after severe brain injury: The Italian experience with families and volunteer associations. Patient 2011; 4: 55-65
Pielmaier L, Walder B, Rebetez MML, Maercker A. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in relatives in the first weeks after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2011; 25: 259-265
von Elm E, Osterwalder J, Graber C, Schoettker P, Stocker R, Zangger P, Vuadens P, Egger M, Walder B. Severe traumatic brain injury in Switzerland: Feasibility and first results of a cohort study. Swiss Medicine Weekly 2008; 138: 327-334
Milders M, Fuchs S, Crawford JR. Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2003; 25: 157-172
Lippert-Grüner M, Kuchta J, Hellmich M, Klug N. Neurobehavioural deficits after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Injury 2006; 20: 569-574
McAllister TW. Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury: Evaluation and management. World Psychiatry 2008; 7: 3-10
Wood RL. Understanding neurobehavioural disability. In: Wood RL, McMillan TM., editors. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury. Hove: Psychology Press; 2001. pp 1-28
Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 2001; 30: 669-689
Cyders MA, Smith GT. Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: Positive and negative urgency. Psychological Bulletin 2008; 134: 807-828
Cyders MA, Dzemidzic M, Eiler WJ, Coskunpinar A, Karyadi KA, Kareken DA. Negative urgency mediates the relationship between amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex activation to negative emotional stimuli and general risk-taking. Cerebral Cortex 2014; pii;bhu123
Smith GT, Fischer S, Cyders MA, Annus AM, Spillane NS, McCarthy DM. On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits. Assessment 2007; 14: 155-170
Rochat L, Beni C, Annoni JM, Vuadens P, Van der Linden M. How inhibition relates to impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2013; 19: 890-898
Rochat L, Billieux J, Juillerat Van der Linden AC, Annoni JM, Zekry D, Gold G, Van der Linden M. A multidimensional approach to impulsivity changes in mild Alzheimers disease and control participants: Cognitive correlates. Cortex 2013; 49: 90-100
Rochat L, Beni C, Billieux J, Azouvi P, Annoni JM, Van der Linden M. Assessment of impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2010; 20: 778-797
Rochat L, Delbeuck X, Billieux J, dAcremont M, Juillerat Van der Linden AC, Van der Linden M. Assessing impulsivity changes in Alzheimer Disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 2008; 22: 278-283
Rochat L, Beni C, Billieux J, Annoni JM, Van der Linden M. How impulsivity relates to compulsive buying and the burden perceived by caregivers after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Psychopathology 2011; 44: 158-164
Garthe E, States JD, Mango NK. Abbreviated injury scale unification: The case for a unified injury system for global use. Journal of Trauma 1999; 47: 309-323
Levin HS, Mazaux JM, Vanier M, Dartigues JF, Giroire JM, Daverat P, Pilon M, Hebert D, Johnson C, Fournier G, Barat M. Evaluation des troubles neuropsychologiques et comportementaux des traumatisés crâniens par le clinicien: Proposition d'une échelle neurocomportementale et premiers résultats de sa version francąise. Annales de Reádaptation et de Médecine Physique 1990; 33: 35-40
Vanier M, Mazaux JM, Lambert J, Dassa C, Levin HS. Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: Interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 796-806
McCauley SR, Levin HS, Vanier M, Mazaux JM, Boake C, Goldfader PR, Rockers D, Butters M, Kareken DA, Lambert J, et al. The neurobehavioural rating scale-revised: Sensitivity and validity in closed head injury assessment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2001; 71: 643-651
Soury S, Mazaux JM, Lambert J, De Seze M, Joseph PA, Lozes-Boudillon S, McCauley SR, Vanier M, Levin HS. The neurobehavioral rating scale-revised: Assessment of concurrent validity. Annales de Reádaptation et de Médecine Physique 2005; 48: 61-70
Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 573-585
Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2000; 69: 204-209
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008; 40: 879-891
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986; 51: 1173-1182
Fritz MS, MacKinnon DP. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science 2007; 18: 233-239
Weston R, Gore PA. A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist 2006; 34: 719-751
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988
Zermatten A, Van der Linden M, d'Acremont M, Jermann F, Bechara A. Impulsivity and decision making. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 2005; 193: 647-650
Bechara A, Van der Linden M. Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries. Current Opinion in Neurology 2005; 18: 734-739
Friedman NP, Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004; 133: 101-135
Dimoska-Di Marco A, McDonald S, Kelly M, Tate R, Johnstone S. A meta-analysis of response inhibition and Stroop interference control deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011; 33: 471-485
Gay P, Rochat L, Billieux J, d'Acremont M, Van der Linden M. Heterogeneous inhibition processes involved in different facets of self-reported impulsivity: Evidence from a community sample. Acta Psychologica 2008; 129: 332-339
Arnould A, Rochat L, Azouvi P, Van der Linden M. A multidimensional approach to apathy after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology Review 2013; 23: 210-233
Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist 1999; 54: 493-503
Burkard C, Rochat L, Van der Linden M. Enhancing inhibition: How impulsivity and emotional activation interact with different implementation intentions. Acta Psychologica 2013; 144: 291-297
Demark J, Gemeinhardt M. Anger and its management for survivors of acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 91-108