Environmental assessment of waste feedstock mono-dimensional and bio-refinery systems: Combining manure co-digestion and municipal waste anaerobic digestion

Moretti, Michele; Van Dael, M.; Malina, R.; Van Passel, S.

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.097

Article (Scientific journals)

Environmental assessment of waste feedstock mono-dimensional and bio-refinery systems: Combining manure co-digestion and municipal waste anaerobic digestion

Moretti, Michele; Van Dael, M.; Malina, R. et al.

2018 • In Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, p. 954-961

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/240298

DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.097

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Environmental assessment of waste feedstock.pdf

Publisher postprint (1.03 MB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Anaerobic digestion; Bioenergy; Biomass; CHP; Life-cycle assessment; Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Commerce; Environmental impact; Environmental management; Eutrophication; Feedstocks; Fertilizers; Gas emissions; Life cycle; Manures; Municipal solid waste; Solid wastes; Waste disposal; Waste management; Waste treatment; Wastes; Bio-energy; Biological treatment; Combined heat and power engines; Environmental assessment; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Organic municipal solid wastes; Resource depletion; Waste management strategies

Abstract :

[en] Organic municipal solid waste (OMSW) as a feedstock for energy recovery and material recycling offers the potential to reduce environmental impacts from energy production while displacing emission-intensive waste management strategies such as landfills. This paper quantifies the environmental impact of anaerobic digestion of local, residual biomass. A life-cycle assessment was jointly performed for two scenarios for the biological treatment of local organic municipal solid waste and pig manure in the Netherlands. Scenario 1 was a separate treatment using anaerobic digestion, and Scenario 2 was a bio-refinery system that integrates anaerobic digestion of organic, municipal solid waste, and co-digestion of pig manure and other organic co-substrates∖. For both scenarios, electricity and heat are generated using a combined heat and power engine. The bio-refinery system (Scenario 2) contribution to climate change resulted in 0.16 Mt CO2 eq./yr, which is lower than the 0.17 Mt CO2 eq./yr of Scenario 1. Both scenarios are found to be beneficial with regard to resource depletion and human toxicity. The integration of organic waste and manure anaerobic digestion has no effect on acidification and terrestrial eutrophication impact categories, resulting in 43.59 AE eq. and 86.33 AE eq. for Scenario 1 and 43.58 AE eq. and 86.30 AE eq. for Scenario 2. Moreover, Scenario 2 yields 18% lower emissions than those from natural gas derived electricity in the Netherlands. The biorefinery system represents an opportunity to improve organic waste-management strategies, at the same time as reducing the environmental impact from energy production and the costs for surplus manure disposal by producing high-quality commodities that can be traded on the market. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd

Disciplines :

Business & economic sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others

Author, co-author :

Moretti, Michele ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Modélisation et développement

Van Dael, M.; UHasselt, Faculty of Business Economics, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium, VITO, Unit of Separation and Conversion Technologies, Boeretang 200, Mol, 2400, Belgium

Malina, R.; UHasselt, Faculty of Business Economics, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium

Van Passel, S.; UHasselt, Faculty of Business Economics, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium, Antwerp University, Faculty of Applied Economics, Department of Engineering Management, Prinsstraat 13, Antwerp, B-2000, Belgium

Language :

English

Title :

Environmental assessment of waste feedstock mono-dimensional and bio-refinery systems: Combining manure co-digestion and municipal waste anaerobic digestion

Publication date :

2018

Journal title :

Journal of Cleaner Production

ISSN :

0959-6526

eISSN :

1879-1786

Publisher :

Elsevier Ltd

Volume :

171

Pages :

954-961

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 15 October 2019

Statistics

Number of views

60 (1 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Agostini, A., Battini, F., Giuntoli, J., Tabaglio, V., Environmentally sustainable Biogas? The key role of manure co-digestion with energy crops. Energies, 2015, 5234–5265, 10.3390/en8065234.
Allwood, J.M., Squaring the circular economy: the role of recycling within a hierarchy of material management strategies. Handbook of Recycling: State-of-the-art for Practitioners, Analysts, and Scientists, 2014, 445–477, 10.1016/B978-0-12-396459-5.00030-1.
Bare, J.C., Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy, 2010, 341–351, 10.1007/s10098-009-0265-9.
Battini, F., Agostini, A., Boulamanti, A.K., Giuntoli, J., Amaducci, S., Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley. Sci. Total Environ. 481 (2014), 196–208, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038.
Belboom, S., Digneffe, J.-M., Renzoni, R., Germain, A., Léonard, A., Comparing technologies for municipal solid waste management using life cycle assessment methodology: a Belgian case study. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18 (2013), 1513–1523, 10.1007/s11367-013-0603-3.
Bernstad Saraiva Schott, A., Wenzel, H., La Cour Jansen, J., Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative life cycle assessments of food waste management - an analytical review. J. Clean. Prod. 119 (2016), 13–24, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.079.
Bisinella, V., Conradsen, K., Christensen, T.H., Astrup, T.F., A global approach for sparse representation of uncertainty in Life Cycle Assessments of waste management systems. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21 (2016), 378–394, 10.1007/s11367-015-1014-4.
Boldrin, A., Andersen, J.K., Møller, J., Christensen, T.H., Favoino, E., Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manag. Res. 27 (2009), 789–799, 10.1177/0734242x09348529.
Boldrin, A., Neidel, T.L., Damgaard, A., Bhander, G.S., Møller, J., Christensen, T.H., Modelling of environmental impacts from biological treatment of organic municipal waste in EASEWASTE. Waste Manag. 31 (2011), 619–630, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.025.
Brambilla Pisoni, E., Raccanelli, R., Dotelli, G., Botta, D., Melià, P., Accounting for transportation impacts in the environmental assessment of waste management plans. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 14 (2009), 248–256, 10.1007/s11367-009-0061-0.
Cherubini, F., Bird, N.D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B., Woess-gallasch, S., Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl 53 (2009), 434–447, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013.
Colón, J., Cadena, E., Pognani, M., Barrena, R., Sánchez, A., Font, X., Artola, A., Determination of the energy and environmental burdens associated with the biological treatment of source-separated municipal solid wastes. Energy Environ. Sci., 5, 2012, 5731, 10.1039/c2ee01085b.
Corsten, M., Worrell, E., Rouw, M., Van Duin, A., The potential contribution of sustainable waste management to energy use and greenhouse gas emission reduction in The Netherlands. Resour. Conserv. Recycl 77 (2013), 13–21, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.002.
De Vries, J.W., Groenestein, C.M., Schröder, J.J., Hoogmoed, W.B., Sukkel, W., Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G., De Boer, I.J.M., Integrated manure management to reduce environmental impact: II. Environmental impact assessment of strategies. Agric. Syst. 138 (2015), 88–99, 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.05.006.
De Vries, J.W., Vinken, T.M.W.J., Hamelin, L., De Boer, I.J.M., Bioresource Technology Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy – a life cycle perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 125 (2012), 239–248, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124.
Eriksson, O., Reich, M.C., Frostell, B., Björklund, A., Assefa, G., Sundqvist, J.O., Granath, J., Baky, A., Thyselius, L., Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 13 (2005), 241–252, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.018.
European Commission, The EU Nitrates Directive. 2010, The EU Nitrates Directive.
European Commission - Joint Research Center, International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - Recommendation for Life Cycle Impact Assesment in the European Context. first ed., 2011, 10.278/33030 Luxemburg.
Evangelisti, S., Lettieri, P., Borello, D., Clift, R., Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. Waste Manag. 34 (2014), 226–237, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.013.
Faaij, A., Van Ree, R., Waldheim, L., Olsson, E., Oudhuis, A., Van Wijk, A., Daey-Ouwens, C., Turkenburg, W., Gasification of biomass wastes and residues for electricity production. Biomass Bioenergy 12 (1997), 387–407, 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00010-X.
Finnveden, G., Johansson, J., Lind, P., Life cycle assessment of energy from solid waste–part 1: general methodology and results. J. Clean. 13 (2005), 213–229, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.023.
Fodor, Z., Klemeš, J.J., Waste as alternative fuel - minimising emissions and effluents by advanced design. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 90 (2012), 263–284, 10.1016/j.psep.2011.09.004.
Gebrezgabher, S.A., Meuwissen, M.P.M., Prins, B.A.M., Lansink, A.G.J.M.O., Economic analysis of anaerobic digestion-A case of Green power biogas plant in The Netherlands. NJAS - Wageningen. J. Life Sci. 57 (2010), 109–115, 10.1016/j.njas.2009.07.006.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., The Circular Economy – a new sustainability paradigm?. J. Clean. Prod. 143 (2017), 757–768, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., Ulgiati, S., A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 114 (2014), 11–32, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007.
Groen, E.A., Heijungs, R., Bokkers, E.A.M., de Boer, I.J.M., Methods for uncertainty propagation in life cycle assessment. Environ. Model. Softw. 62 (2014), 316–325, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.006.
Groen, E.A., Heijungs, R., Bokkers, E.A.M., Boer, I.J.M. De, Sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. LCA Food San Fr. USA 8-10 Oct. 2014, 2014, 482–488.
Hijazi, O., Munro, S., Zerhusen, B., Effenberger, M., Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54 (2016), 1291–1300, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.013.
Huijbreghts, M.A.J., Seppälä, J., Towards region-specific, European fate factors for airborne nitrogen compounds causing aquatic eutrophication. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 5 (2000), 65–67.
Laurent, A., Bakas, I., Clavreul, J., Bernstad, A., Niero, M., Gentil, E., Hauschild, M.Z., Christensen, T.H., Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems - Part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag. 34 (2014), 573–588, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045.
Lopez-Ridaura, S., Werf, H. Van Der, Marie, J., Le, B., Environmental evaluation of transfer and treatment of excess pig slurry by life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage 90 (2009), 1296–1304, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.008.
Maes, D., Van Dael, M., Vanheusden, B., Goovaerts, L., Reumerman, P., Marquez Luzardo, N., Van Passel, S., Assessment of the sustainability guidelines of EU Renewable Energy Directive: the case of biorefineries. J. Clean. Prod. 88 (2015), 61–70, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.051.
Mezzullo, W.G., McManus, M.C., Hammond, G.P., Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste. Appl. Energy 102 (2013), 657–664, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.008.
Møller, J., Boldrin, A., Christensen, T.H., Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution. Waste Manag. Res. 27 (2009), 813–824, 10.1177/0734242X09344876.
Morris, J., Scott Matthews, H., Morawski, C., Review and meta-analysis of 82 studies on end-of-life management methods for source separated organics. Waste Manag. 33 (2013), 545–551, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.004.
Mosquera, J., Schils, R., Groenestein, K., Hoeksma, P., Velthof, G., Hummelink, E., Emissies van lachgas, methaan en ammoniak uit mest na scheiding. (Wageningen), 2010.
Oenema, O., Oudendag, D., Velthof, G.L., Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livest. Sci. 112 (2007), 261–272, 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.007.
Prapaspongsa, T., Christensen, P., Schmidt, J.H., Thrane, M., LCA of comprehensive pig manure management incorporating integrated technology systems. J. Clean. Prod. 18 (2010), 1413–1422, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.05.015.
Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., Bras, B., A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13 (2008), 374–388, 10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9.
Rentizelas, A., Karellas, S., Kakaras, E., Tatsiopoulos, I., Comparative techno-economic analysis of ORC and gasification for bioenergy applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 50 (2009), 674–681, 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.10.008.
Rosenbaum, R.K., Bachmann, T.M., Jolliet, O., Juraske, R., Koehler, A., Hauschild, M.Z., USEtox — the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2008, 532–546, 10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4.
Saer, A., Lansing, S., Davitt, N.H., Graves, R.E., Life cycle assessment of a food waste composting system: environmental impact hotspots. J. Clean. Prod. 52 (2013), 234–244, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.022.
Sawatdeenarunat, C., Nguyen, D., Surendra, K.C., Shrestha, S., Rajendran, K., Oechsner, H., Xie, L., Khanal, S.K., Anaerobic biorefinery: current status, challenges, and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol., 2016, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.074.
Seber, G., Malina, R., Pearlson, M.N., Olcay, H., Hileman, J.I., Barrett, S.R.H., Environmental and economic assessment of producing hydroprocessed jet and diesel fuel from waste oils and tallow. Biomass Bioenergy 67 (2014), 108–118, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.024.
Seppälä, J., Posch, M., Johansson, M., Hettelingh, J., LCA methodology country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11 (2006), 403–416.
Soltani, A., Sadiq, R., Hewage, K., Selecting sustainable waste-to-energy technologies for municipal solid waste treatment: a game theory approach for group decision-making. J. Clean. Prod. 113 (2016), 388–399, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.041.
Staples, M.D., Malina, R., Barrett, S.R.H., The limits of bioenergy for mitigating global life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels. Nat. Energy, 2, 2017, 16202, 10.1038/nenergy.2016.202.
Styles, D., Dominguez, E.M., Chadwick, D., Science of the Total Environment Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: an evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 560–561 (2016), 241–253, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.236.
SWD 259, State of Play on the Sustainability of Solid and Gaseous Biomass Used for Electricity, Heating and Cooling in the EU. (Brussels), 2014.
Turner, D.A., Williams, I.D., Kemp, S., Combined material flow analysis and life cycle assessment as a support tool for solid waste management decision making. J. Clean. Prod. 129 (2016), 234–248, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.077.
Van Dael, M., Marquez, N., Reumermann, P., Pelkmans, L., Kuppens, T., Van Passel, S., On the Map Development and techno-economic evaluation of a biorefi nery based on biomass ( waste ) streams – case study in The Netherlands. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefining 5 (2013), 635–644, 10.1002/bbb.
Van Dael, M., Van Passel, S., Pelkmans, L., Guisson, R., Reumermann, P., Luzardo, N.M., Witters, N., Broeze, J., A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park. Appl. Energy 104 (2013), 611–622, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.071.
VROM, Landelijk Afvalbeheerplan 2009-2021-Naar Een Materiaalketenbeleid [National Waste Managment Plan 2009-2021-towards a Material Life Cycle Policy]. The Netheralands), 2010.
Wang, M., Huo, H., Arora, S., Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5726–5736, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.052.
Weidema, B., Hischier, R., Ecoinvent Data v2.2. The 2010 Version of the Most Comprehensive and Most Popular Public LCI Database 3. 2010.
Weidema, B., Hischier, R., Althaus, H., Bauer, C., Code of Practice. ecoinvent report No. 2. Swiss Cent. Life Cycle Invent, 1, 2009, 32, 10.1108/eb003163.
Whiting, A., Azapagic, A., Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion. Energy 70 (2014), 181–193, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.103.
Willems, J., Van Grinsven, H.J.M., Jacobsen, B.H., Jensen, T., Dalgaard, T., Westhoek, H., Kristensen, I.S., Why Danish pig farms have far more land and pigs than Dutch farms? Implications for feed supply, manure recycling and production costs. Agric. Syst. 144 (2016), 122–132, 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.002.
Willems, W.J., Van Grinsven, H.J.M., Ex Ante Evaluatie Mestbeleid 2013, Gevolgen van de invoering van verplichte mestverwerking en het afschaffen van productierechten in de veehouderij. 2013, Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving, Wageningen UR, Den Haag.