[en] Since the first transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in 2002, the paradigm for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis has changed. In the recent past, medical therapy with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty was the only option for inoperable patients but now, TAVI has become the treatment of choice for these patients and the preferred alternative for high-risk operable patients. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) currently remains the gold standard for patients at low operative risk. As randomized trials have demonstrated comparable (or better results with TAVI) between TAVI and SAVR in the high-risk population, there is now a clear trend towards performing TAVI even in intermediate-risk. Nevertheless, there are still questions regarding TAVI involving paravalvular leak, stroke, pacemaker requirements, and durability, which remain to be more definitively answered before TAVI can routinely be performed in lower risk and younger population. Improvements in patient selection, multimodal imaging, and third generation devices have significantly decreased the incidence of TAVI complications. A role for post-procedure antithrombotic or anticoagulant management remains unanswered. Waiting for current studies to provide us with clear answers to these questions, it is the Heart Team's task to determine the optimal treatment for each patient based on risk scores, frailty metrics, comorbidities, patient's preference, and potential for improvement in quality of life.
Disciplines :
Cardiovascular & respiratory systems
Author, co-author :
MARTINEZ, Christophe ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de médecine interne > Cardiologie interventionnelle
GACH, Olivier ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de médecine interne > Cardiologie interventionnelle
RADERMECKER, Marc ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de chirurgie > Service de chirurgie cardio-vasculaire et thoracique
Lancellotti, Patrizio ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Cardiologie - Pathologie spéciale et réhabilitation
Language :
French
Title :
Remplacement valvulaire aortique par voie transcatheter : du concept au changement de paradigme dans le traitement des stenoses aortiques.
Alternative titles :
[en] Transcatheter aortic valve replacement : from a concept to a medical revolution
Publication date :
2019
Journal title :
Revue Médicale de Liège
ISSN :
0370-629X
eISSN :
2566-1566
Publisher :
Université de Liège. Revue Médicale de Liège, Liège, Belgium
Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al.- Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, 29, 630-634.
Martinsson A, Li X, Andersson C, et al.- Temporal trends in the incidence and prognosis of aortic stenosis: a nationwide study of the Swedish population. Circulation, 2015, 131, 988-994.
Lancellotti P, Magne J, Dulgheru R, et al.- Outcomes of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis followed up in heart valve clinics. JAMA Cardiol, 2018, 3, 1060-1068.
O'Neill WW.- Predictors of long term survival after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty: report of the Mansfield scientific balloon aortic valvuloplasty registry. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1991, 17, 193-198.
Eltchaninoff H, Nusimovici-Avadis D, Babaliaros V, et al.- Five month study of percutaneous heart valves in the systemic circulation of sheep using a novel model of aortic insufficiency. Eurointerv, 2006, 1, 438-444.
Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A et al.- Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation, 2002, 106, 3006-3008.
Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C et al.- Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve mid-term follow-up from the Initial feasibility stu- dies: the french experience. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47, 1214-1223.
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al.- Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med, 2010, 363, 1597-1607.
Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al.- Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2011, 364, 2187-2198.
Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Jilaihawi H, et al.-Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366, 1696-1704.
Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al.- Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366, 1686-1695.
Mack M, Leon M, Smith C, et al.- 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis. Lancet, 2015, 385, 2477-2784.
Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ.- Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med, 2014, 371, 967-968.
Reardon MJ, Adams DH, Kleiman NS, et al.-2-year outcomes in patients undergoing surgical or selfexpanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015, 66, 113-121.
Webb JG, Altwegg L, Boone RH, et al.- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Impact on clinical and valve-related outcomes. Circulation, 2009, 119, 3009-3016.
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al.- PARTNER 2 Investigators. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374, 1609-1620.
Lancellotti P, Kulbertus H.- PARTNER-2: TAVI versus chirurgie dans les risques intermédiaires de sténose aortique sévère symptomatique. Rev Med Liege, 2016, 71, 302-307.
Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, et al.-Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a selfexpanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370, 1790-1798.
Thyregod HG, Steinbrüchel DA 2, Ihlemann N 3, et al.- Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: 1-year results from the all-comers NOTION randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015, 65, 2184-2194.
Søndergaard L, Ihlemann N, Capodanno D, et al.-Durability of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients at lower surgical risk. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73, 546-553.
Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ et al.- 2017 ESC/ EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heat J, 2017, 38, 2739-2791.
Lancellotti P, Ancion A, Davin L, et al. - Le « Heart Team»: définition et organisation. Point de vue du cardiologue. Rev Med Liege, 2019, NHS, 5-9.
Lancellotti P, Martinez C, Radermecker M.- The long quest for the holy grail in transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis: durability and long-term performance. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73, 554-558.
Blackman DJ, Saraf S, MacCarthy PA, et al.-Long-term durability of transcatheter aortic valve Q5 prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 73, 537-545.
Daneault B, Kirtane AJ, Kodali SK, et al.- Stroke associated with surgical and transcatheter treatment of aortic stenosis: a comprehensive review. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 58, 2143-2150.
Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S et al.- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA, 2014, 312, 162-170.
O'Sullivan CJ, Windecker S.- Implications of bicuspid aortic valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 6, 204-206.
Shreenivas S, Kaneko T, Tang GHL.- Predicting the future of TAVR: an obituary to open aortic valve replacement? Curr Opin Cardiol, 2019, 34, 112-123.