Revisiting ‘it-extraposition’: The historical development of constructions with matrices (it)/(there) be + NP followed by a complement clause
Davidse, Kristin; Van linden, An
2020 • In Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma; López-Couso, María José; Méndez-Naya, Belénet al. (Eds.) Crossing Linguistic Boundaries: Systemic, Synchronic and Diachronic Variation in English
[en] This article traces the historical development of complement constructions with matrices containing be + NP with wonder as well as those containing be + tweo/doubt, and proposes an analysis of them at two levels of generality. At the meso-constructional level, all the forms of (it/that) + be + wundor are analysed as historical variants of a predicative matrix and those with (of that) + (it/there) + be + tweo as historical variants of an existential clause. At the macro-constructional level, we argue that the two meso-constructions share the same schematic functional and structural components, which is evidenced by the fact that they both allow for comparable lexical and grammatical readings, and that the latter readings have the same paradigmatic variants, viz. parentheticals and discursively juxtaposed independent sentences. In view of this we posit a single macro-construction, with matrix and complement clause as the primary structural units. We thus propose a different analysis for the subtype with predicative matrix than the traditional it-extraposition account, which treats the that-clause as the extraposed subject of the whole construction, and views subject extraposition as a phenomenon sui generis. Against this, our analysis “respects the overt form” (Langacker 1991: 69) which the existential and predicative matrices and their complement clause have had through their whole history, and proposes semantics naturally coded by this form.
Research Center/Unit :
Lilith - Liège, Literature, Linguistics - ULiège
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Davidse, Kristin
Van linden, An ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de langues modernes : ling., litt. et trad. > Linguistique synchronique anglaise
Language :
English
Title :
Revisiting ‘it-extraposition’: The historical development of constructions with matrices (it)/(there) be + NP followed by a complement clause
Publication date :
2020
Main work title :
Crossing Linguistic Boundaries: Systemic, Synchronic and Diachronic Variation in English
Publishing director :
Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma
López-Couso, María José
Méndez-Naya, Belén
Pérez-Guerra, Javier
Publisher :
Bloomsbury Academic, London, United Kingdom
Pages :
81-103
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Name of the research project :
Negation and grammaticalization: The development of modal, polar and mirative meanings by expressions with 'no' need, 'no' wonder, 'no' chance and 'no' way
Bolinger, Dwight (1973), Ambient It Is Meaningful too!’, Journal of Linguistics, 9: 261-70.
Boye, Kasper and Peter Harder (2007),‘Complement-taking Predicates: Usage and Linguistic Structure’, Studies in Language, 31: 569-606.
Breivik, Leiv E. (1983), Existential There. A Synchronic and Diachronic Study, Bergen: University of Bergen.
Breivik, Leiv E. (1989),‘On the Causes of Syntactic Change in English’, in Leiv E. Breivik and Ernst Hakon Jahr (eds), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes, 29-70, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brinton, Laurel (2008), The Comment Clause in English. Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidse, Kristin (1999), ‘ The Semantics of Cardinal versus Enumerative Existential Constructions, Cognitive Linguistics, 10 (3): 203-50.
Davidse, Kristin, Simon De Wolf and An Van linden (2015),‘The Development of the Modal and Discourse Marker Uses of (there/it is/I have) no doubt’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 16 (1): 25-58.
Gentens Caroline, Ditte Kimps, Gilles Jacobs, Kristine Davidse, An Van linden and Lot Brems (2016),‘Mirativity and Rhetorical Structure: The Development and Prosody of Disjunct and Anaphoric Adverbials with No Wonder, in Gunther Kaltenbock, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann (eds), Outside the Clause, 125-56, Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994), An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn, London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen (2004), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn, London: Arnold.
Heyvaert, Lisbet (2003), A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hopper, Paul and Elizabeth C. Traugott (2003), Grammaticalization, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulk, Aafte and Ans van Kemenade (1993),‘Subjects, Nominative Case, Agreement, and Functional Heads’, Lingua, 89: 181-215.
Kaltenbock, Gunther (2000),‘It-extraposition and Non-extraposition in English Discourse’, in Christian Mair and Marianne Hundt (eds), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 157-75, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kaltenbock, Gunther (2003), ‘On the Syntactic and Semantic Status of Anticipatory It’, English Language and Linguistics, 7: 235-55.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar 1: Theoretical Preliminaries, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar2: Descriptive Application, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2002),‘Deixis and Subjectivity’, in Frank Brisard (ed), Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, 373-97, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Larsson, Ida (2014),‘Choice of Non-referential Subject in Existential Constructions and with Weather-Verbs’, Nordic Atlas of Language Structures, 1: 55-71.
Lopez-Couso, Maria Jose (2006),‘On Negative Existentials in Early English,, in Leiv E. Breivik, Sandra Halverson and Kari E. Haugland (eds), ‘These things write I vnto thee…’: Essays in Honour of Bjorg Bxkken, 175-87, Oslo: Novus Press.
Lopez-Couso, Maria Jose (2011),‘Developmental Parallels in Diachronic and Ontogenetic Grammaticalization: Existential There as a Test Case’, Folia Linguistica 45(1): 81-102.
Los, Bettelou (2015), Historical Syntax of English, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Loureiro-Porto, Lucia (2010),‘Verbo-nominal Constructions of Necessity with pearf n. and Need n.: Competition and Grammaticalization from OE to eModE’, English Language and Linguistics, 14 (3): 373-97.
Lyons, John (1977), Semantics. Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGregor, William B. (1997), Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mitchell, Bruce (1985), Old English Syntax, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mohlig-Falke, Ruth (2012), The Early English Impersonal Construction: An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pfenninger, Simone E. (2009), Grammaticalization Paths of English and High German Existential Constructions: A Corpus-based Study, Bern: Peter Lang.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985), A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Ramhoj, Rickard (2016),‘On Clausal Subjects and Extraposition in the History of English,, PhD diss., University of Gothenburg.
Rosenbaum, Peter S. (1967), The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie and Karin Aijmer (2007), The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty. A Corpus-based Study of English Adverbs, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. (1992), ‘Syntax’, in Richard M. Hogg (ed), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. I: The beginnings to 1066, 168-229, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2008), ‘Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Incremental Development of Language: Suggestions from the Development of Degree Modifiers in English’, in Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jager and Tonjes Veenstra (eds), Variation, Selection, Development: Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, 219-50, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Van linden, An (2012), Modal Adjectives: English Deontic and Evaluative Constructions in Diachrony and Synchrony, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Williams, Alexander (2000),‘Null Subjects in Middle English Existentials’, in Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas and Anthony Warner (eds), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, 164-87, Oxford: Oxford University Press.