Reference : Cloud microphysics and circulation anomalies control differences in future Greenland melt
Scientific journals : Article
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences : Earth sciences & physical geography
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/237499
Cloud microphysics and circulation anomalies control differences in future Greenland melt
English
Hofer, Stefan mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Département de géographie >]
Tedstone, A. []
Fettweis, Xavier mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Climatologie et Topoclimatologie >]
Bamber, J. []
23-Jun-2019
Nature Climate Change
Nature Publishing Group
9
523–528
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
1758-678X
1758-6798
United Kingdom
[en] Recently, the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has become the main source of barystatic sea-level rise. The increase in the GrIS melt is linked to anticyclonic circulation anomalies, a reduction in cloud cover and enhanced warm-air advection. The Climate Model Intercomparison Project fifth phase (CMIP5) General Circulation Models (GCMs) do not capture recent circulation dynamics; therefore, regional climate models (RCMs) driven by GCMs still show significant uncertainties in future GrIS sea-level contribution, even within one emission scenario. Here, we use the RCM Modèle Atmosphèrique Règional to show that the modelled cloud water phase is the main source of disagreement among future GrIS melt projections. We show that, in the current climate, anticyclonic circulation results in more melting than under a neutral-circulation regime. However, we find that the GrIS longwave cloud radiative effect is extremely sensitive to the modelled cloud liquid-water path, which explains melt anomalies of +378 Gt yr–1 (+1.04 mm yr–1 global sea level equivalent) in a +2 °C-warmer climate with a neutral-circulation regime (equivalent to 21% more melt than under anticyclonic circulation). The discrepancies between modelled cloud properties within a high-emission scenario introduce larger uncertainties in projected melt volumes than the difference in melt between low- and high-emission scenarios.
Fédération Wallonie Bruxelles. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - F.R.S.-FNRS ; CECI
Researchers ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/237499
10.1038/s41558-019-0507-8
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-019-0507-8

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
Hofer-2019-Nature CC (GRD, MAR,clouds).pdfPublisher postprint2.43 MBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.