Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: comparison between weight-bearing conditions

Evrard, Laurence; Audigié, Fabrice; Bertoni, Lélia; Jacquet, Sandrine; Denoix, Jean-Marie; Busoni, Valeria

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211101

Article (Scientific journals)

Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: comparison between weight-bearing conditions

Evrard, Laurence; Audigié, Fabrice; Bertoni, Lélia et al.

2019 • In PLoS ONE

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/236895

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0211101

PubMed
30689659

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

journal.pone.0211101.pdf

Publisher postprint (2.48 MB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Abstract :

[en] This descriptive study aimed to compare the magnetic resonance appearance of the distal interphalangeal joint articular cartilage between standing weight-bearing and non-weightbearing conditions. Ten forefeet of live horses were scanned in a standing low-field magnetic resonance system (0.27 T). After euthanasia for reasons unrelated to the study, the non-weight-bearing isolated feet were scanned in a vertical positioning reproducing limb orientation in live horses. The same acquisition settings as during the weight-bearing examination were used. Thickness and cross-sectional area of the distal interphalangeal articular cartilage and joint space were measured on tridimensional T1-weighted gradient echo high resolution frontal and sagittal images at predetermined landmarks in both conditions and were compared using a linear mixed-effects model. Frontal images were randomized and submitted to 9 blinded readers with 3 different experience levels for identification of weightbearing versus non-weight-bearing acquisitions based on cartilage appearance. Weightbearing limbs had significantly thinner distal interphalangeal cartilage (p = 0.0001) than nonweight-bearing limbs. This change was greater in the distal phalanx cartilage than that of the middle phalanx. Blinded readers correctly identified 83% (range 65 to 95%) of the images as weight-bearing or non-weight-bearing acquisitions, with significantly different results observed among the different readers (p < 0.001) and groups (p < 0.001). These results indicate that distal interphalangeal articular cartilage and particularly cartilage of the distal phalanx thins when weight-bearing compared to the non-weight-bearing standing postmortem conditions and suggest that cartilage abnormalities may be more difficult to identify on weight-bearing standing magnetic resonance imaging.

Disciplines :

Veterinary medicine & animal health

Author, co-author :

Evrard, Laurence ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Clinique vétérinaire universitaire (CVU)

Audigié, Fabrice

Bertoni, Lélia

Jacquet, Sandrine

Denoix, Jean-Marie

Busoni, Valeria ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés (DCA) > Imagerie médicale

Language :

English

Title :

Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine distal interphalangeal joint: comparison between weight-bearing conditions

Publication date :

28 January 2019

Journal title :

PLoS ONE

eISSN :

1932-6203

Publisher :

Public Library of Science, United States - California

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 16 June 2019

Statistics

Number of views

63 (12 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

21 (6 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Dyson SJ, Murray R, Schramme MC. Lameness associated with foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses (January 2001—December 2003) and response to treatment. Equine Vet J 2005; 37: 113–121. PMID: 15779622
Dyson SJ, Murray R. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 264 horses with foot pain: the podotro-chlear apparatus, deep digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint. Equine Vet J 2007; 39: 340–343. PMID: 17722726
Sherlock CE, Kinns J, Mair TS. Evaluation of foot pain in the standing horse by magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Rec 2007; 161: 739–744. PMID: 18056010
Sampson SN, Schneider RK, Gavin PR, Ho CP, Tucker RL, Charles EM. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in horses with recent onset navicular syndrome but without radiographic abnormalities. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 339–346. PMID: 19697596
Olive J. Distal interphalangeal articular cartilage assessment using low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51: 259–266. PMID: 20469547
Olive J, D’Anjou MA, Girard C Laverty S, Theoret C. Fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of equine metacarpophalangeal articular cartilage. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51: 107–115. PMID: 20402392
Werpy NM, Ho CP, Pease AP, Kawcak CE. The effect of sequence selection and field strength on detection of osteochondral defects in the metacarpophalangeal joint. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011; 52: 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01761.x PMID: 21388466
Smith MA, Dyson SJ, Murray RC. Reliability of high- and low-field magnetic resonance imaging systems for detection of cartilage and bone lesions in the equine cadaver fetlock. Equine Vet J 2012; 44: 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00561.x PMID: 22435499
Pease A. Biochemical evaluation of equine articular cartilage through imaging. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2012; 28: 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2012.08.004 PMID: 23177136
Carstens A, Kirberger RM, Velleman M, Dahlberg LE, Fletcher L, Lammentausta E. Feasibility for mapping cartilage T1 relaxation times in the distal metacarpus3/metatarsus3 of thoroughbred racehorses using delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC): normal cadaver study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013; 54: 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12030 PMID: 23551282
Carstens A, Kirberger RM, Dahlberg LE, Prozesky L, Fletcher L, Lammentausta E. Validation of delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage and T2 mapping for quantifying distal metacarpus/metatarsus cartilage thickness in Thoroughbred racehorses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013; 54: 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12002 PMID: 23279707
Murray RC, Branch MV, Tranquille C, Woods S. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 1999–2005. PMID: 16334962
Anastasiou A, Skioldebrand E, Ekman S, Hall LD. Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of the distal row of equine carpal bones: assessment of bone sclerosis and cartilage damage. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003; 44: 501–512. PMID: 14599160
Hontoir F, Nisolle JF, Meurisse H, Simon V, Tallier M, Vanderstricht R, et al. A comparison of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography to identify structural cartilage defects of the fetlock joint in the horse. Vet J 2014; 199: 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.021PMID: 24321368
McKnight AL, Posh J. Articular cartilage lesions seen with MRI at 0.25T in the distal equine limb. J Equ Vet Science 2012; 32: 667–673.
Bischofberger AS, Fürst AE, Torgerson PR, Carstens A, Hilbe M, Kircher P. Use of a 3-Tesla magnet to perform delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the distal interphalangeal joint of horses with and without naturally occuring osteoarthritis. Am J Vet Res 2018; 79: 287–298. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.79.3.287 PMID: 29466042
Porter E, Winter M, Sheppard B, Berry C, Hernandez J. Correlation of articular cartilage thickness measurements made with magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography, and computed tomographic arthrography with gross articular cartilage thickness in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2016; 57: 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12390 PMID: 27478155
Spriet M. Letter to the editor. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55: 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12110_1PMID: 25132614
Liu F, Kozanek M, Hosseini A, Velde SKVd, Gill TJ, Rubash HE, et al. In vivo tibiofemoral cartilage deformation during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech 2010; 43: 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.028 PMID: 19896131
Cotofana S, Eckstein F, Wirth W, Souza RB, Li X, Wyman B, et al. In vivo measures of cartilage deformation: patterns in healthy and osteoarthritic female knees using 3T MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1127–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2057-y PMID: 21448616
Wang H, Koff MF, Potter HG, Warren RF, Rodeo SA, Maher SA. An MRI-compatible loading device to assess knee joint cartilage deformation: Effect of preloading and inter-test repeatability. J Biomech 2015; 48: 2934–2940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.006 PMID: 26303166
Hosseini A, Van de Velde SK, Kozanek M, Gill TJ, Grodzinsky AJ, Rubash HE, et al. In-vivo time-dependent articular cartilage contact behavior of the tibiofemoral joint. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.011 PMID: 20434573
Chan DD, Cai L, Butz KD, Trippel SB, Nauman EA, Veu CP. In vivo articular cartilage deformation: noninvasive quantification of intratissue strain during joint contact in the human knee. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 19220. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19220 PMID: 26752228
Bingham JT, Papannagari R, Van de Velde SK, Gross C, Gill TJ, Felson DT, et al. In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint. Rheumatology 2008; 47: 1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken345 PMID: 18775967
Greaves LL, Gilbart MK, Yung A, Kozlowski P, Wilson DR. Deformation and recovery of cartilage in the intact hip under physiological loads using 7T MRI. J Biomech 2009; 42: 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.11.025 PMID: 19147144
Wan L, de Asla RJ, Rubash HE, Li G. In vivo cartilage contact deformation of human ankle joints under full body weight. J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 1081–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20593 PMID: 18327792
Subburaj K, Souza RB, Stehling C, Wyman BT, Le Graverand-Gastineau MP, Link TM, et al. Association of MR relaxation and cartilage deformation in knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 2012; 30: 919–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22031 PMID: 22161783
Neu CP. Functional imaging in OA: role of imaging in the evaluation of tissue biomechanics. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22: 1349–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.05.016 PMID: 25278049
Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld JP, Waterton JC, Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14, s1: 46–75.
Kladny B, Bail H, Swoboda B, Schiwy-Bochat H, Beyer WF, Weseloh G. Cartilage thickness measurement in magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996; 4:181–186. PMID: 8895219
The R Core Team. Changes in R. The R journal 2015; 7: 227–238.
Lee H, Kirkland WG, Whitmore RN, Theis KM, Young HE, Richardson AJ, et al. Comparison of equine articular cartilage thickness in various joints. Connect Tissue Res 2014; 55: 339–347. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008207.2014.949698 PMID: 25111191
Lee H, Theis K, Jackson R, Hanson R. Equine articular cartilage stiffness determination using indentation. J Tribol 2015; 137: 1–9.
Brama PAJ, Tekoppele JM, Bank RA, Kassenberg D, Barneveld A, Van Weeren PR. Topographical mapping of biochemical properties of articular cartilage in the equine fetlock joint. Equine Vet J 2000; 32: 19–26. PMID: 10661380
Chen SS, Falcovitz YH, Schneiderman R, Maroudas A, Sah RL. Depth-dependent compressive properties of normal aged human femoral head articular cartilage: relationship to fixed charge density. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9: 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.2001.0424 PMID: 11520170
Szarko M, Xia Y. Direct visualisation of the depth-dependent mechanical properties of full-thickness articular cartilage. Open J Orthop 2012; 2: 34–39.
Gahunia HK, Pritzker KP. Effect of exercise on articular cartilage. Orthop Clin N Am 2012; 43: 187–199.
Wong BL, Sah RL. Mechanical asymmetry during articulation of tibial and femoral cartilage: local and overall compressive and shear deformation and properties. J Biomech 2010; 43: 1689–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.035 PMID: 20394929
Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Putz R. The effects of exercise on human articular cartilage. J Anat 2006; 208: 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00546.x PMID: 16637874
Lyyra T, Kiviranta I, Vaatainen U, Helminen HJ, Jurvelin JS. In vivo characterization of indentation stiffness of articular cartilage in the normal human knee. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 48: 482–487. PMID: 10421691
Kersting UG, Stubendorff JJ, Schmidt MC, Bruggemann GP. Changes in knee cartilage volume and serum comp concentration after running exercise. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.005 PMID: 16154364
Werpy NM. Low-field MRI in horses: practicalities and image acquisition. In: Murray RC, ed. Equine MRI. West Sussex, England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2011; 81.
Contino EK, Barrett MF, Werpy NM. Effect of limb positioning on the radiographic appearance of the distal and proximal interphalangeal joint spaces of the forelimbs of horses during evaluation of dorsopalmar radiographs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014; 244: 1186–1190. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.244.10. 1186 PMID: 24786167
McGibbon CA, Bencardino J, Palmer WE. Subchondral bone and cartilage thickness from MRI: effects of chemical-shift artifact. MAGMA 2003; 16: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-003-0001-0 PMID: 12695880
Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Edwin M, Leidholdt J, Boone JM. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Advanced image acquisition methods, artifacts, spectroscopy, quality control, siting, bioeffects, and safety. In: Bushberg JT, ed. The essential physics of medical imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2012; 449–499
Murray RC, Mair TS, Sherlock CE, Blunden AS. Comparison of high-field and low-field magnetic resonance images of cadaver limbs of horses. Vet Rec 2009; 165: 281–288. PMID: 19734560