Article (Scientific journals)
Participatory innovation analysis along livestock value chains: Case of swine value chain in Benin
Govoeyi, Benoit; Ahounou, Serge G.; Agbokounou, Aristide Mahoutin et al.
2019In Agricultural Systems, 174, p. 11-22
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
19_AgrSyst.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.28 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Benin; Innovation characterisation; Participatory; Swine value chain; Suidae
Abstract :
[en] Rural poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa remains a huge challenge despite the successive agricultural development policies, most of which have failed to involve stakeholders actively. The present rise of pork demand in Benin calls for an assessment of the swine value chain (VC) to envision its development. A participatory approach is here proposed to join this assessment to a stimulation of innovation among stakeholders. The approach is divided in four stages: i) identification of actors and direct links along the VC, ii) characterisation of innovation practices, iii) identification of bottlenecks and opportunities using innovation system framework, and iv) measurement of agreement among VC actors about constraints and value-added sharing, using proportional piling tool. A second survey, two full years after the first one, assessed the impact of actions conducted with VC actors. A typological analysis of innovation practices was conducted to define “innovation profiles” among each of the three main categories of actors: swine stockbreeders (n = 134), pork butchers (n = 45) and input suppliers (n = 25). Three innovation profiles were retained for each category, which may be understood as covering 2 distinct innovator profiles and one non-innovator profile. The profiles qualified as “innovators” accounted for 82%, 84%, and 76%, respectively in stockbreeders, pork butchers and input suppliers. The lack of professionalisation appeared to actors as the main constraint. The Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) indicated that actors agreed to state that pork butchers gained the most part of the value-added, followed by input suppliers. The second survey showed favorable impacts of the approach and follow-up activities on exchanges and organisation within the VC. It is here advocated that the present participatory method, while characterising the value-chain in a rapid way, further sets the basis for the dialogue between actors and the stimulation of innovation along the VC, which can be further sustained through an exchange platform. © 2019
Disciplines :
Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...)
Author, co-author :
Govoeyi, Benoit ;  Polytechnic School of Abomey Calavi, Department of Animal Health and Production, Benin
Ahounou, Serge G.;  Polytechnic School of Abomey Calavi, Department of Animal Health and Production, Benin
Agbokounou, Aristide Mahoutin;  Benin Center of Scientific and Technical Research (CBRST), Cotonou, Benin
Salifou, Chakirath F.A.;  Polytechnic School of Abomey Calavi, Department of Animal Health and Production, Benin
Dotche, Ignace O.;  Polytechnic School of Abomey Calavi, Department of Animal Health and Production, Benin
Kiki, Pascal S.;  Polytechnic School of Abomey Calavi, Department of Animal Health and Production, Benin
Youssao Abdou Karim, Issaka;  Polytechnic School of Abomey Calavi, Department of Animal Health and Production, Benin
Antoine-Moussiaux, Nicolas  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Dpt. de gestion vétérinaire des Ressources Animales (DRA) > Biostatistique, économie, sélection animale
Language :
English
Title :
Participatory innovation analysis along livestock value chains: Case of swine value chain in Benin
Publication date :
2019
Journal title :
Agricultural Systems
ISSN :
0308-521X
eISSN :
1873-2267
Publisher :
Elsevier
Volume :
174
Pages :
11-22
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 12 June 2019

Statistics


Number of views
80 (9 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
5 (5 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
12
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
8
OpenCitations
 
9

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi