Article (Scientific journals)
Comparison of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells From Different Origins for the Treatment of Graft-vs.-Host-Disease in a Humanized Mouse Model.
Grégoire, Céline; Ritacco, Caroline; Hannon, Muriel et al.
2019In Frontiers in Immunology, 10, p. 619
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
fimmu-10-00619.pdf
Publisher postprint (4.44 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
NSG; adipose tissue; bone marrow; graft-vs.-host-disease; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; mesenchymal stromal cells; umbilical cord; xenogeneic
Abstract :
[en] Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have potent immunomodulatory properties that make them an attractive tool against graft- vs.-host disease (GVHD). However, despite promising results in phase I/II studies, bone marrow (BM-) derived MSCs failed to demonstrate their superiority over placebo in the sole phase III trial reported thus far. MSCs from different tissue origins display different characteristics, but their therapeutic benefits have never been directly compared in GVHD. Here, we compared the impact of BM-, umbilical cord (UC-), and adipose-tissue (AT-) derived MSCs on T-cell function in vitro and assessed their efficacy for the treatment of GVHD induced by injection of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in NOD-scid IL-2Rgamma(null) HLA-A2/HHD mice. In vitro, resting BM- and AT-MSCs were more potent than UC-MSCs to inhibit lymphocyte proliferation, whereas UC- and AT-MSCs induced a higher regulatory T-cell (CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+))/T helper 17 ratio. Interestingly, AT-MSCs and UC-MSCs activated the coagulation pathway at a higher level than BM-MSCs. In vivo, AT-MSC infusions were complicated by sudden death in 4 of 16 animals, precluding an analysis of their efficacy. Intravenous MSC infusions (UC- or BM- combined) failed to significantly increase overall survival (OS) in an analysis combining data from 80 mice (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-1.08, P = 0.087). In a sensitivity analysis we also compared OS in control vs. each MSC group separately. The results for the BM-MSC vs. control comparison was HR = 0.63 (95% CI 0.30-1.34, P = 0.24) while the figures for the UC-MSC vs. control comparison was HR = 0.56 (95% CI 0.28-1.10, P = 0.09). Altogether, these results suggest that MSCs from various origins have different effects on immune cells in vitro and in vivo. However, none significantly prevented death from GVHD. Finally, our data suggest that the safety profile of AT-MSC and UC-MSC need to be closely monitored given their pro-coagulant activities in vitro.
Disciplines :
Hematology
Author, co-author :
Grégoire, Céline  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA-R : Hématologie
Ritacco, Caroline ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > I3-Hematology
Hannon, Muriel 
SEIDEL, Laurence  
Delens, Loïc ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA-R : Hématologie
Belle, Ludovic ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > I3-Hematology
DUBOIS, Sophie 
Veriter, Sophie;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de médecine interne > Laboratoire de thérapie cellulaire et génique (LTCG)
LECHANTEUR, Chantal 
BRIQUET, Alexandra 
Beguin, Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Hématologie
Baron, Frédéric  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > I3-Hematology
More authors (4 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells From Different Origins for the Treatment of Graft-vs.-Host-Disease in a Humanized Mouse Model.
Publication date :
2019
Journal title :
Frontiers in Immunology
eISSN :
1664-3224
Publisher :
Frontiers Research Foundation, Lausanne, Switzerland
Volume :
10
Pages :
619
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 22 May 2019

Statistics


Number of views
116 (23 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
67 (11 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
56
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
52
OpenCitations
 
42

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi