Article (Scientific journals)
Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice: a position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).
Beaudart, Charlotte; Rolland, Y.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.J. et al.
2019In Calcified Tissue International, 105 (1), p. 1-14
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Assessment of Muscle Function and Physical Performance in ....pdf
Publisher postprint (683.17 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
muscle function; muscle strenght; physical performance; daily practice; sarcopenia; muscle strength
Abstract :
[en] It is well recognized that poor muscle function and poor physical performance are strong predictors of clinically relevant adverse events in older people. Given the large number of approaches to measure muscle function and physical performance, clinicians often struggle to choose a tool that is appropriate and validated for the population of older people they deal with. In this paper, an overview of different methods available and applicable in clinical settings is proposed. This paper is based on literature reviews performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face-to-face meetings were organized afterwards where the whole group could amend and discuss the recommendations further. Several characteristics should be considered when choosing a tool: (1) purpose of the assessment (intervention, screening, diagnosis); (2) patient characteristics (population, settings, functional ability, etc.); (3) psychometric properties of the tool (test–retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, etc.); (4) applicability of the tool in clinical settings (overall cost, time required for the examination, level of training, equipment, patient acceptance, etc.); (5) prognostic reliability for relevant clinical outcomes. Based on these criteria and the available evidence, the expert group advises the use of grip strength to measure muscle strength and the use of 4-m gait speed or the Short Physical Performance Battery test to measure physical performance in daily practice. The tools proposed are relevant for the assessment of muscle weakness and physical performance. Subjects with low values should receive additional diagnostic workups to achieve a full diagnosis of the underlying condition responsible (sarcopenia, frailty or other).
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Beaudart, Charlotte ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Rolland, Y.
Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.
Bauer, J.M.
Sieber, C.
Cooper, C.
Al-Daghri, N.
Araujo de Carvalho, I.
Bautmans, I.
Bernabei, R.
Bruyère, Olivier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Cesari, M.
Cherubini, A.
Dawson-Hughes, B.
Kanis, J.A.
Kaufman, J.M.
Landi, F.
Maggi, S.
McCloskey, J.
PETERMANS, Jean ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Département de médecine interne > Service de gériatrie
Rodriguez Manas, L.
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Roller-Wirnsberger
Schaap, L.A.
Uebelhart, D.
Rizzoli, R.
Fielding, R.A.
More authors (17 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice: a position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).
Publication date :
July 2019
Journal title :
Calcified Tissue International
ISSN :
0171-967X
eISSN :
1432-0827
Publisher :
Springer, Germany
Volume :
105
Issue :
1
Pages :
1-14
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 16 May 2019

Statistics


Number of views
96 (17 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
11 (8 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
334
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
291
OpenCitations
 
197
OpenAlex citations
 
386

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi