Article (Scientific journals)
How do vulnerable road users look at road safety? International comparison based on ESRA data from 25 countries
Torfs, K.; Meesmann, Uta
2019In Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 63, p. 144-152
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
TRF_ESRA1_vulnerable road users_Torfs_Meesmann_2019.pdf
Publisher postprint (507.34 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Attitudes; Safety culture; Self-reported behavior; Vulnerable road users; Accident prevention; Highway accidents; Motor transportation; Regression analysis; Roads and streets; International comparison; Logistic regression models; Representative sample; Road safety policies; Road users; Surveys
Abstract :
[en] The overall aim of the ESRA project is to provide scientific support to road safety policy by generating comparable national data on the current road safety situation. The first ESRA survey was conducted online using representative samples (N = 1000) of the national adult populations in 25 countries across the world. The field work was carried out in two waves: (1) June/July 2015, and (2) November 2016. In total, the first ESRA1 survey covers almost 27,000 respondents, among which roughly 21,000 were identified as vulnerable road users. Vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists, or motorcyclists suffer the most severe consequences in road crashes with other road users, because they cannot protect themselves against the speed and mass of the other party. Given their high vulnerability, these types of road users are of special interest to policy makers. The objective of this paper is to present the ESRA1 results regarding the safety attitudes of vulnerable road users. Special attention was given to ‘road crash involvement’, ‘safety feeling’, and ‘self-reported unsafe traffic behavior’ (i.e., the use of headphone and (motor)cycle helmet). Results show that vulnerable road users were more involved in road crashes compared to car drivers and that they feel less safe. Pedestrians feel safer in traffic compared to other types of vulnerable road users. Logistic regression models show that the use of headphones while walking and cycling is associated with gender, age, and support of policy measures. The use of a (motor)cycle helmet is associated with age and support of policy measures. The ESRA project has shown the feasibility and the added value of joint data collection by a network of road safety organizations. The intention is to extend the ESRA survey to an increasing number of countries and to repeat it on a triennial basis. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Torfs, K.;  Knowledge Centre Road Safety, Vias Institute, Haachtsesteenweg 1405, Brussels, BE-1130, Belgium
Meesmann, Uta ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Doct. art bâtir & urba. (FSA -paysage)
Language :
English
Title :
How do vulnerable road users look at road safety? International comparison based on ESRA data from 25 countries
Publication date :
2019
Journal title :
Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
ISSN :
1369-8478
eISSN :
1873-5517
Publisher :
Elsevier Ltd
Volume :
63
Pages :
144-152
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 08 May 2019

Statistics


Number of views
87 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
299 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
9
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
9
OpenCitations
 
5
OpenAlex citations
 
11

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi