Exploring the future of carbon capture and utilisation by combining an international Delphi study with local scenario development

Vreys, K.; Lizin, S.; Van Dael, M.; Tharakan, Joseph; Malina, R.

doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.027

Article (Scientific journals)

Exploring the future of carbon capture and utilisation by combining an international Delphi study with local scenario development

Vreys, K.; Lizin, S.; Van Dael, M. et al.

2019 • In Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, p. 484-501

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/235052

DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.027

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Vreys et al RCR 2019.pdf

Publisher postprint (1.24 MB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

CCU; CDU; Delphi method; Futures study; Scenario development; Technological foresight

Abstract :

[en] This article identifies the factors that, according to international experts, will have substantial effects on the future development and commercialisation of carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) technologies. A two-round online Delphi study with 15 international experts in the field of CCU enabled us to explore the main items within five impact categories: (1) benefits, (2) risks, (3) future developments, (4) demand, and (5) supply constraints. Based on the results of the Delphi study, we constructed 4 future scenarios that represent how the CCU sector could develop within 10 years, using a local scenario development workshop with 9 experts from within Flanders (Belgium) and the Netherlands. We used a deductive, explorative scenario development method, which resulted in a two-by-two scenario matrix. We find that the local experts consider the role of the government and the development of CCU costs to be the most uncertain factors and could have the highest impact on the development of the sector within the next 10 years. Our insights can be instructive for facilitating the process of scenario planning for CCU development activities. Finally, although we work with a regionally specific case study, the same method could be implemented in other regions, using the general findings from our Delphi study as a starting point for the scenario development. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.

Disciplines :

Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...)

Author, co-author :

Vreys, K.; Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan Building D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium, Université de Liège, HEC-Liège, Department of Economics, bd du Rectorat B31, Liège, B-4000, Belgium

Lizin, S.; Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan Building D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium

Van Dael, M.; Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan Building D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium, VITO, Unit of Separation and Conversion Technologies, Boeretang 200, Mol, 2400, Belgium

Tharakan, Joseph ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > Economie internationale

Malina, R.; Hasselt University, Faculty of Business Economics, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Agoralaan Building D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium

Language :

English

Title :

Exploring the future of carbon capture and utilisation by combining an international Delphi study with local scenario development

Publication date :

2019

Journal title :

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

ISSN :

0921-3449

eISSN :

1879-0658

Publisher :

Elsevier B.V.

Volume :

146

Pages :

484-501

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 02 May 2019

Statistics

Number of views

116 (6 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Abanades, J.C., et al. On the climate change mitigation potential of CO2 conversion to fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 10:12 (2017), 2491–2499.
Al-Mamoori, A., et al. Carbon capture and utilization update. Energy Technol., 2017.
Alwin, D.F., Krosnick, J.A., The measurement of values in surveys: a comparison of ratings and rankings. Public Opin. Q. 49:4 (1985), 535–552.
Amer, M., Daim, T.U., Jetter, A., A review of scenario planning. Futures 46 (2013), 23–40.
Arakawa, H., et al. Catalysis research of relevance to carbon management: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Chem. Rev. 101:4 (2001), 953–996.
Aresta, M., Carbon Dioxide Recovery and Utilization. 2013, Springer Science & Business Media.
Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., Angelini, A., The changing paradigm in CO2 utilization. J.CO2 Utiliz. 3 (2013), 65–73.
Armstrong, K., Styring, P., Assessing the potential of utilization and storage strategies for post-combustion CO2 emissions reduction. Front. Energy Res., 3(8), 2015.
Artz, J., et al. Sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide: an integrated review of catalysis and life cycle assessment. Chem. Rev., 2017.
Beckman, E.J., Supercritical and near-critical CO2 in green chemical synthesis and processing. J. Supercrit. Fluids 28:2 (2004), 121–191.
Bishop, P., Hines, A., Collins, T., The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9:1 (2007), 5–25.
Blanken, W., et al. Optimizing carbon dioxide utilization for microalgae biofilm cultivation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114:4 (2017), 769–776.
Börjeson, L., et al. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures 38:7 (2006), 723–739.
Brancheau, J.C., Janz, B.D., Wetheerbe, J.C., Key issues in information systems management: 1994–95 SIM Delphi results. MIS Q., 1996, 225–242.
Bruhn, T., Naims, H., Olfe-Kräutlein, B., Separating the debate on CO2 utilisation from carbon capture and storage. Environ. Sci. Policy 60 (2016), 38–43.
Carlsson Reich, M., Economic assessment of municipal waste management systems – case studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). J. Clean. Prod. 13:3 (2005), 253–263.
Copeman, C., Picture This – A Guide to Scenario Planning for Voluntary Organisations. 2006, NCVO Publications.
Corbin, J., Strauss, A., Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Z. Soziol. 19:6 (1990), 418–427.
Cuéllar-Franca, R.M., Azapagic, A., Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: a critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J. CO2 Utiliz. 9 (2015), 82–102.
Dalkey, N., Helmer, O., An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage. Sci. 9:3 (1963), 458–467.
Dekleva, S., Zupančič, J., Key issues in information systems management: a Delphi study in Slovenia. Inform. Manage. 31:1 (1996), 1–11.
Dimitriou, I., et al. Carbon dioxide utilisation for production of transport fuels: process and economic analysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 8:6 (1789), 1775–1789.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. 2012 Available at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf.
Fraga, E.S., Ng, M., A framework for the analysis of the security of supply of utilising carbon dioxide as a chemical feedstock. Faraday Discuss. 183 (2015), 309–326.
Gilbart, E., Kreiger, N., Improvement in cumulative response rates following implementation of a financial incentive. Am. J. Epidemiol. 148:1 (1998), 97–99.
Goeppert, A., et al. Recycling of carbon dioxide to methanol and derived products – closing the loop. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43:23 (2014), 7995–8048.
Goodman, L.A., Snowball sampling. Ann. Math. Stat., 1961, 148–170.
Gordon, T., Pease, A., Delphi: R.T., An efficient “round-less” almost real time Delphi method. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73:4 (2006), 321–333.
Gupta, U.G., Clarke, R.E., Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: a bibliography (1975–1994). Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 53:2 (1996), 185–211.
Hall, J.K., Martin, M.J., Disruptive technologies, stakeholders and the innovation value-added chain: a framework for evaluating radical technology development. R&D Manage. 35:3 (2005), 273–284.
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78:9 (2011), 1695–1704.
Hunt, A.J., et al. Generation capture, and utilization of industrial carbon dioxide. ChemSusChem 3:3 (2010), 306–322.
Jacobsson, S., Lauber, V., The politics and policy of energy system transformation – explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34:3 (2006), 256–276.
Jones, C.R., et al. What a waste! Assessing public perceptions of carbon dioxide utilisation technology. J. CO2 Utiliz. 7 (2014), 51–54.
Kang, D., et al. Carbon capture and utilization using industrial wastewater under ambient conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 308 (2017), 1073–1080.
Karatayev, M., et al. Renewable energy technology uptake in Kazakhstan: policy drivers and barriers in a transitional economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 66 (2016), 120–136.
Keil, M., Tiwana, A., Bush, A., Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study 1. Inform. Syst. J. 12:2 (2002), 103–119.
Keith, D.W., Why capture CO2 from the atmosphere?. Science 325:5948 (2009), 1654–1655.
Kendall, M.G., Smith, B.B., The Problem of m Rankings. 1939, 275–287.
Khoo, H.H., et al. Carbon capture and utilization: preliminary life cycle CO2, energy, and cost results of potential mineral carbonation. Energy Procedia 4 (2011), 2494–2501.
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M., Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 127 (2017), 221–232.
Kobus, J., Westner, M., Ranking-type Delphi studies in is research: step-by-step guide and analytical extension. 9th IADIS International Conference, 2016.
Kosow, H., Gaßner, R., Methods of Future and Scenario Analysis: Overview, Assessment, and Selection Criteria. 2008.
Kunc, M.F., O'Brien, A., Exploring the development of a methodology for scenario use: combining scenario and resource mapping approaches. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 124 (2017), 150–159.
Lainez-Aguirre, J.M., Pérez-Fortes, M., Puigjaner, L., Economic evaluation of bio-based supply chains with CO2 capture and utilisation. Comput. Chem. Eng., 2017.
Lehr, T., et al. Scenario-based strategizing: advancing the applicability in strategists’ teams. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 124 (2017), 214–224.
Li, L., et al. A review of research progress on CO2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel 108 (2013), 112–130.
Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M., The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, vol. 29, 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Loo, R., The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing 25:4 (2002), 762–769.
Mac Dowell, N., et al. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7:4 (2017), 243–249.
Mahmoud, M., et al. A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24:7 (2009), 798–808.
Margolis, R., Zuboy, J., Nontechnical Barriers to Solar Energy Use: Review of Recent Literature. 2006, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO.
Markewitz, P., et al. Worldwide innovations in the development of carbon capture technologies and the utilization of CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 5:6 (2012), 7281–7305.
Melander, L., Dubois, A., Hedvall, K., Lind, F., Future goods transport in Sweden 2050: using a Delphi-based scenario analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 138 (2019), 178–189.
Mikkelsen, M., Jørgensen, M., Krebs, F.C., The teraton challenge. A review of fixation and transformation of carbon dioxide. Energy Environ. Sci. 3:1 (2010), 43–81.
Mullen, P.M., Delphi: myths and reality. J. Health Organ. Manage. 17:1 (2003), 37–52.
Müller, K., Mokrushina, L., Arlt, W., Thermodynamic constraints for the utilization of CO2. Chem. Ing. Techn. 86:4 (2014), 497–503.
Najera, M., et al. Carbon capture and utilization via chemical looping dry reforming. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89:9 (2011), 1533–1543.
Negro, S.O., Suurs, R.A.A., Hekkert, M.P., The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 75:1 (2008), 57–77.
Nowack, M., Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: quality and design considerations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78:9 (2011), 1603–1615.
Nygrén, N.A., Tapio, P., Qi, Y., Lake management in 2030—five future images based on an international Delphi study. Futures 93 (2017), 1–13.
O'Brien, F.A., Meadows, M., Scenario orientation and use to support strategy development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80:4 (2013), 643–656.
Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D., The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform. Manage. 42:1 (2004), 15–29.
Pare, G., et al. A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Inform. Manage. 50:5 (2013), 207–217.
Patricio, J., et al. Region prioritization for the development of carbon capture and utilization technologies. J. CO2 Utiliz. 17 (2017), 50–59.
Powell, C., The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J. Adv. Nurs. 41:4 (2003), 376–382.
Quadrelli, E.A., et al. Carbon dioxide recycling: emerging large-scale technologies with industrial potential. ChemSusChem 4:9 (2011), 1194–1215.
Rahman, F.A., et al. Pollution to solution: capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 71 (2017), 112–126.
Riduan, S.N., Zhang, Y., Recent developments in carbon dioxide utilization under mild conditions. Dalton Trans. 39:14 (2010), 3347–3357.
Rowe, G., Wright, G., The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int. J. Forecast. 15:4 (1999), 353–375.
Rowe, G., Wright, G., Expert opinions in forecasting: the role of the Delphi technique. Principles of Forecasting, 2001, Springer, 125–144.
Sayre, R., Microalgae: the potential for carbon capture. BioScience 60:9 (2010), 722–727.
Schmidt, R.C., Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decis. Sci. 28:3 (1997), 763–774.
Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Mark Keil, P.C., Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 17:4 (2001), 5–36.
Schoemaker, P.J., Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Manage. Rev. 36:2 (1995), 25–50.
Schrag, D.P., Storage of carbon dioxide in offshore sediments. Science 325:5948 (2009), 1658–1659.
Siebelink, R., Halman, J.I., Hofman, E., Scenario-driven roadmapping to cope with uncertainty: its application in the construction industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. change 110 (2016), 226–238.
Song, C., Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing. Catal. Today 115:1–4 (2006), 2–32.
Styring, P., Jansen, D., Carbon Capture and Utilisation in the Green Economy: Using CO2 to Manufacture Fuel, Chemicals and Materials. 2011, Centre for Low Carbon Futures.
Styring, P., Quadrelli, E.A., Armstrong, K., Carbon Dioxide Utilisation: Closing the Carbon Cycle. 2014, Elsevier.
TGC Initiative, A Roadmap for the Global Implementation of Carbon Utilization Technologies: Transforming CO2 from a Liability to an Asset at Significant Market Scale. 2016.
The Royal Society, The Potential and Limitations of Using Carbon Dioxide. 2017, Royal Society.
Thomassen, G., et al. A review of the sustainability of algal-based biorefineries: towards an integrated assessment framework. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68 (2017), 876–887.
UNEP, Global Environment Outlook 3. 2002, 320.
Van der Heijden, K., Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. 2011, John Wiley & Sons.
van Heek, J., Arning, K., Ziefle, M., Reduce, reuse, recycle: acceptance of CO2-utilization for plastic products. Energy Policy 105 (2017), 53–66.
Van Notten, P.W., et al. An updated scenario typology. Futures 35:5 (2003), 423–443.
van't Klooster, S.A., van Asselt, M.B.A., Practising the scenario-axes technique. Futures 38:1 (2006), 15–30.
von der Assen, N., Bardow, A., Life cycle assessment of polyols for polyurethane production using CO2 as feedstock: insights from an industrial case study. Green Chem. 16:6 (2014), 3272–3280.
von der Assen, N., Jung, J., Bardow, A., Life-cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and utilization: avoiding the pitfalls. Energy Environ. Sci. 6:9 (2013), 2721–2734.
von der Gracht, H.A., Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79:8 (2012), 1525–1536.
von der Gracht, H.A., Darkow, I.-L., Scenarios for the logistics services industry: a Delphi-based analysis for 2025. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 127:1 (2010), 46–59.
Wilson, G., et al. A vision for Smart CO2 Transformation in Europe (SCOT) using CO2 as a resource. Seventh Framework Programme and European Union, 2016.
Wulf, T., Meissner, P., Stubner, S., A Scenario-based Approach to Strategic Planning–Integrating Planning and Process Perspective of Strategy. 2010, Leipzig Graduate School of Management.
Yaqoot, M., Diwan, P., Kandpal, T.C., Review of barriers to the dissemination of decentralized renewable energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58 (2016), 477–490.
Yousuf, M.I., Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 12:4 (2007), 1–8.
Yu, K.M.K., et al. Recent advances in CO2 capture and utilization. ChemSusChem 1:11 (2008), 893–899.
Zhang, X., Fan, J.-L., Wei, Y.-M., Technology roadmap study on carbon capture, utilization and storage in China. Energy Policy 59 (2013), 536–550.