Article (Scientific journals)
Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies
Geerinck, Anton; Alekna, Vidmantas; Beaudart, Charlotte et al.
2019In PLoS ONE, 14 (4)
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Geerinck et al (2019) Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the SarQoL questionnaire.pdf
Author postprint (628.63 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Objectives The Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire, a sarcopenia-specific patient- reported outcome measure, evaluates quality of life with 55 items. It produces 7 domain scores and 1 overall quality of life score, all between 0 and 100 points. This study aims to contribute to the interpretation of the SarQoL scores by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) in a sample of subjects from 9 studies. Methods Subjects from 9 studies (conducted in Belgium, Brazil, Czech Republic, England, Greece, Lithuania, Poland and Spain) were included. The SEM, a measure of the error in the scores that is not due to true changes, was calculated by dividing the standard deviation of the dif- ference between test and retest scores (SDdiff) by p2. The SDC, defined as change beyond measurement error, was calculated by multiplying SDdiff by 1.96. Bland-Altman plots were assessed for the presence of systematic errors. Results A total of 278 sarcopenic subjects, aged 77.67 ± 7.64 years and 61.5% women, were included. The SEM for the overall SarQoL score ranged from 0.18 to 4.20 points for the indi- vidual studies, and was 2.65 points when all subjects were analyzed together. The SDC forhe overall score ranged from 0.49 to 11.65 points for the individual studies, and was 7.35 points for all subjects. The Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic errors in the questionnaire. Conclusion This study shows that, for individual subjects, a change in overall quality of life of at least 7.35 points (on a scale from 0 to 100) would have to be observed to confirm that a true change, beyond measurement error, has occurred. It also demonstrated that the SarQoL questionnaire is a precise instrument, with the observed scores within less than 3 points of the theoretical “true score”.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Geerinck, Anton ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Alekna, Vidmantas
Beaudart, Charlotte ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Bautmans, Ivan
Cooper, Cyrus ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Département des sciences de la santé publique
De Souza Orlandi, Fabiana
Konstantynowicz, Jerzy
Monterro-Errasquin, Beatriz
Topinkova, Eva
Tsekoura, Maria
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Bruyère, Olivier  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Language :
English
Title :
Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies
Publication date :
29 April 2019
Journal title :
PLoS ONE
eISSN :
1932-6203
Publisher :
Public Library of Science, United States - California
Volume :
14
Issue :
4
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
Fonds pour la formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (Communauté française de Belgique) - FRIA
Available on ORBi :
since 30 April 2019

Statistics


Number of views
84 (17 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
18 (5 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
31
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
23
OpenCitations
 
17

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi