Wickland, D.P., Hanzawa, Y., The FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER 1 gene family: functional evolution and molecular mechanisms. Mol. Plant 8 (2015), 983–997.
McGarry, R.C., Ayre, B.G., Manipulating plant architecture with members of the CETS gene family. Plant Sci., 2012 188–189, 71–81.
Shannon, S., Meeks-Wagner, D.R., A mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Plant Cell 3 (1991), 877–892.
Ratcliffe, O.J., et al. Separation of shoot and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Development 126 (1999), 1109–1120.
Ratcliffe, O.J., et al. A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development 125 (1998), 1609–1615.
Wang, Z., et al. Functional evolution of phosphatidylethanolamine binding proteins in soybean and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27 (2015), 323–336.
Weigel, D., et al. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell 69 (1992), 843–859.
Mandel, M.A., et al. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360 (1992), 273–277.
Weigel, D., Nilsson, O., A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature 377 (1995), 495–500.
Ohshima, S., et al. Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 254 (1997), 186–194.
Serrano-Mislata, A., et al. Separate elements of the TERMINAL FLOWER 1 cis-regulatory region integrate pathways to control flowering time and shoot meristem identity. Development 143 (2016), 3315–3327.
Bradley, D., et al. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science 275 (1997), 80–83.
Bradley, D., et al. Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 379 (1996), 791–797.
Foucher, F., et al. DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING are two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15 (2003), 2742–2754.
Mohamed, R., et al. Populus CEN/TFL1 regulates first onset of flowering, axillary meristem identity and dormancy release in Populus. Plant J. 62 (2010), 674–688.
Kotoda, N., et al. Antisense expression of MdTFL1, a TFL1-like gene, reduces the juvenility phase in apple. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 131 (2006), 74–81.
Freiman, A., et al. Development of a transgenic early flowering pear (Pyrus communis L.) genotype by RNAi silencing of PcTFL1-1 and PcTFL1-2. Planta 235 (2012), 1239–1251.
Iwata, H., et al. The TFL1 homologue KSN is a regulator of continuous flowering in rose and strawberry. Plant J. 69 (2012), 116–125.
Pillitteri, L.J., et al. Isolation and characterization of a TERMINAL FLOWER homolog and its correlation with juvenility in citrus. Plant Physiol. 135 (2004), 1540–1551.
Matsoukas, I.G., et al. Starch metabolism and antiflorigenic signals modulate the juvenile-to-adult phase transition in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 36 (2013), 1802–1811.
Wang, R., et al. Aa TFL1 confers an age-dependent response to vernalization in perennial Arabis alpina. Plant Cell 23 (2011), 1307–1321.
Blazquez, M.A., et al. LEAFY expression and flower initiation in Arabidopsis. Development 124 (1997), 3835–3844.
Bergonzi, S., et al. Mechanisms of age-dependent response to winter temperature in perennial flowering of Arabis alpina. Science 340 (2013), 1094–1097.
Yamaguchi, A., et al. The microRNA-regulated SBP-Box transcription factor SPL3 is a direct upstream activator of LEAFY FRUITFULL, and APETALA1. Dev. Cell 17 (2009), 268–278.
Winter, C.M., et al. LEAFY target genes reveal floral regulatory logic, cis motifs, and a link to biotic stimulus response. Dev. Cell 20 (2011), 430–443.
Serrano-Mislata, A., et al. Regulatory interplay between LEAFY, APETALA1/CAULIFLOWER and TERMINAL FLOWER1: new insights into an old relationship. Plant Signal. Behav., 12, 2017, e1370164.
Goslin, K., et al. Transcription factor interplay between LEAFY and APETALA1/CAULIFLOWER during floral initiation. Plant Physiol. 174 (2017), 1097–1109.
Jensen, C.S., et al. A TERMINAL FLOWER1-like gene from perennial ryegrass involved in floral transition and axillary meristem identity. Plant Physiol. 125 (2001), 1517–1528.
Rantanen, M., et al. Strawberry homologue of TERMINAL FLOWER1 integrates photoperiod and temperature signals to inhibit flowering. Plant J. 82 (2015), 163–173.
Koskela, E.A., et al. Altered regulation of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 causes the unique vernalisation response in an arctic woodland strawberry accession. New Phytol. 216 (2017), 841–853.
Bull-Herenu, K., Classen-Bockhoff, R., Open and closed inflorescences: more than simple opposites. J. Exp. Bot. 62 (2011), 79–88.
Zhao, Y., et al. Evolutionary co-option of floral meristem identity genes for patterning of the flower-like Asteraceae inflorescence. Plant Physiol. 172 (2016), 284–296.
Bull-Herenu, K., Classen-Bockhoff, R., Ontogenetic course and spatial constraints in the appearance and disappearance of the terminal flower in inflorescences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 172 (2011), 471–498.
Park, S.J., et al. Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 639–644.
Prusinkiewicz, P., et al. Evolution and development of inflorescence architectures. Science 316 (2007), 1452–1456.
Périlleux, C., et al. Inflorescence development in tomato: gene functions within a zigzag model. Front. Plant Sci., 5, 2014, 121.
Thouet, J., et al. Revisiting the involvement of SELF-PRUNING in the sympodial growth of tomato. Plant Physiol. 148 (2008), 61–64.
Crane, O., et al. Cytokinin-induced VvTFL1A expression may be involved in the control of grapevine fruitfulness. Planta 235 (2012), 181–192.
Fernandez, L., et al. Transposon-induced gene activation as a mechanism generating cluster shape somatic variation in grapevine. Plant J. 61 (2010), 545–557.
Danilevskaya, O.N., et al. Concerted modification of flowering time and inflorescence architecture by ectopic expression of TFL1-like genes in maize. Plant Physiol. 153 (2010), 238–251.
Ma, Q., et al. Alterations of CorTFL1 and CorAP1 expression correlate with major evolutionary shifts of inflorescence architecture in Cornus (Cornaceae) - a proposed model for variation of closed inflorescence forms. New Phytol. 216 (2017), 519–535.
Cheng, X., et al. Dissection of genetic regulation of compound inflorescence development in Medicago truncatula. Development, 145, 2018, dev158766.
Jaeger, K.E., et al. Interlocking feedback loops govern the dynamic behavior of the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25 (2013), 820–833.
Eriksson, S., et al. GA4 is the active gibberellin in the regulation of LEAFY transcription and Arabidopsis floral initiation. Plant Cell 18 (2006), 2172–2181.
Corbesier, L., et al. Cytokinin levels in leaves, leaf exudate and shoot apical meristem of Arabidopsis thaliana during floral transition. J. Exp. Bot. 54 (2003), 2511–2517.
Wahl, V., et al. Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 339 (2013), 704–707.
Sessions, A., et al. Cell-cell signaling and movement by the floral transcription factors LEAFY and APETALA1. Science 289 (2000), 779–782.
Perez-Ruiz, R.V., et al. XAANTAL2 (AGL14) is an important component of the complex gene regulatory network that underlies Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem transitions. Mol. Plant 8 (2015), 796–813.
Repinski, S.L., et al. The common bean growth habit gene PvTFL1y is a functional homolog of Arabidopsis TFL1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124 (2012), 1539–1547.
Tian, Z., et al. Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (2010), 8563–8568.
McGarry, R.C., et al. Monopodial and sympodial branching architecture in cotton is differentially regulated by the Gossypium hirsutum SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS and SELF-PRUNING orthologs. New Phytol. 212 (2016), 244–258.
Si, Z., et al. Mutation of SELF-PRUNING homologs in cotton promotes short-branching plant architecture. J. Exp. Bot. 69 (2018), 2543–2553.
Benlloch, R., et al. Genetic control of inflorescence architecture in legumes. Front. Plant Sci., 6, 2015, 543.
Wagner, D., et al. Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFY. Science 285 (1999), 582–584.
Liljegren, S.J., et al. Interactions among APETALA1 LEAFY, and TERMINAL FLOWER1 specify meristem fate. Plant Cell 11 (1999), 1007–1018.
Liu, C., et al. A conserved genetic pathway determines inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis and rice. Dev. Cell 24 (2013), 612–622.
Fernandez-Nohales, P., et al. AGO1 controls Arabidopsis inflorescence architecture possibly by regulating TFL1 expression. Ann. Bot. 114 (2014), 1471–1481.
Berbel, A., et al. VEGETATIVE1 is essential for development of the compound inflorescence in pea. Nat. Commun., 3, 2012, 797.
Ping, J., et al. Dt2 is a gain-of-function MADS-domain factor gene that specifies semideterminacy in soybean. Plant Cell 26 (2014), 2831–2842.
Conti, L., Bradley, D., TERMINAL FLOWER1 is a mobile signal controlling Arabidopsis architecture. Plant Cell 19 (2007), 767–778.
Alvarez, J., et al. Terminal flower - a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2 (1992), 103–116.
Aguilar-Martinez, J.A., et al. Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell 19 (2007), 458–472.
Niwa, M., et al. BRANCHED1 interacts with FLOWERING LOCUS T to repress the floral transition of the axillary meristems in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25 (2013), 1228–1242.
Pnueli, L., et al. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125 (1998), 1979–1989.
Randoux, M., et al. Gibberellins regulate the transcription of the continuous flowering regulator RoKSN, a rose TFL1 homologue. J. Exp. Bot. 63 (2012), 6543–6554.
Koskela, E.A., et al. Mutation in TERMINAL FLOWER1 reverses the photoperiodic requirement for flowering in the wild strawberry Fragaria vesca. Plant Physiol. 159 (2012), 1043–1054.
Tenreira, T., et al. A specific gibberellin 20-oxidase dictates the flowering-runnering decision in diploid strawberry. Plant Cell 29 (2017), 2168–2182.
Caruana, J.C., et al. Suppressor of Runnerless encodes a DELLA protein that controls runner formation for asexual reproduction in strawberry. Mol. Plant 11 (2018), 230–233.
Haberman, A., et al. Different flowering response to various fruit loads in apple cultivars correlates with degree of transcript reaccumulation of a TFL1-encoding gene. Plant J. 87 (2016), 161–173.
Monselise, S.P., Goldschmidt, E.E., Alternate bearing in fruit trees. Hortic Rev. 4 (1982), 128–173.
Haberman, A., et al. A possible role for flowering locus T-encoding genes in interpreting environmental and internal cues affecting olive (Olea europaea L.) flower induction. Plant Cell Environ. 40 (2017), 1263–1280.
Kobayashi, Y., et al. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science 286 (1999), 1960–1962.
Abe, M., et al. FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science 309 (2005), 1052–1056.
Wigge, P.A., et al. Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science 309 (2005), 1056–1059.
Corbesier, L., et al. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316 (2007), 1030–1033.
Taoka, K., et al. 14-3-3 proteins act as intracellular receptors for rice Hd3a florigen. Nature 476 (2011), 332–335.
Lifschitz, E., et al. Florigen and anti-florigen - a systemic mechanism for coordinating growth and termination in flowering plants. Front. Plant Sci., 5, 2014, 465.
Pnueli, L., et al. Tomato SP-interacting proteins define a conserved signaling system that regulates shoot architecture and flowering. Plant Cell 13 (2001), 2687–2702.
Randoux, M., et al. RoKSN, a floral repressor, forms protein complexes with RoFD and RoFT to regulate vegetative and reproductive development in rose. New Phytol. 202 (2014), 161–173.
Varkonyi-Gasic, E., et al. Homologs of FT, CEN and FD respond to developmental and environmental signals affecting growth and flowering in the perennial vine kiwifruit. New Phytol. 198 (2013), 732–746.
Hanano, S., Goto, K., Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1 is involved in the regulation of flowering time and inflorescence development through transcriptional repression. Plant Cell 23 (2011), 3172–3184.
Kaneko-Suzuki, M., et al. TFL1-like proteins in rice antagonize rice FT-like protein in inflorescence development by competition for complex formation with 14-3-3 and FD. Plant Cell Physiol. 59 (2018), 458–468.
Higuchi, Y., et al. The gated induction system of a systemic floral inhibitor, antiflorigen, determines obligate short-day flowering in chrysanthemums. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), 17137–17142.
Pin, P.A., et al. An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediates the control of flowering time in sugar beet. Science 330 (2010), 1397–1400.
Hsu, C.Y., et al. FLOWERING LOCUS T duplication coordinates reproductive and vegetative growth in perennial poplar. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108 (2011), 10756–10761.
Liu, W., et al. Functional diversification of Flowering Locus T homologs in soybean: GmFT1a and GmFT2a/5a have opposite roles in controlling flowering and maturation. New Phytol. 217 (2018), 1335–1345.
Cao, K., et al. Four tomato FLOWERING LOCUS T-like proteins act antagonistically to regulate floral initiation. Front. Plant Sci., 6, 2016, 1213.
Liu, L., et al. FTIP1 is an essential regulator required for florigen transport. PLoS Biol., 10, 2012, e1001313.
Zhu, Y., et al. NaKR1 regulates long-distance movement of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants, 2, 2016, 16075.
Ahn, J.H., et al. A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO J. 25 (2006), 605–614.
Hanzawa, Y., et al. A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005), 7748–7753.
Ho, W.W., Weigel, D., Structural features determining flower-promoting activity of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant Cell 26 (2014), 552–564.
Wang, Z., et al. The divergence of flowering time modulated by FT/TFL1 is independent to their interaction and binding activities. Front. Plant Sci., 8, 2017, 697.
Sohn, E.J., et al. The shoot meristem identity gene TFL1 is involved in flower development and trafficking to the protein storage vacuole. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (2007), 18801–18806.
Nakamura, Y., et al. Arabidopsis florigen FT binds to diurnally oscillating phospholipids that accelerate flowering. Nat. Commun., 5, 2014, 3553.
Koskela, E.A., et al. TERMINAL FLOWER1 is a breeding target for a novel everbearing trait and tailored flowering responses in cultivated strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 14 (2016), 1852–1861.
Silva, W.B., et al. SELF-PRUNING acts synergistically with DIAGEOTROPICA to guide auxin responses and proper growth form. Plant Physiol. 176 (2018), 2904–2916.
Guo, X., et al. A putative CENTRORADIALIS/TERMINAL FLOWER 1-like gene, Ljcen1, plays a role in phase transition in Lotus japonicus. J. Plant Physiol. 163 (2006), 436–444.
Argiriou, A., et al. Characterization and expression analysis of TERMINAL FLOWER1 homologs from cultivated allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and its diploid progenitors. J. Plant Physiol. 165 (2008), 1636–1646.
Drabesova, J., et al. The evolution of the FT/TFL1 genes in Amaranthaceae and their expression patterns in the course of vegetative growth and flowering in Chenopodium rubrum. G3 (Bethesda) 6 (2016), 3065–3076.
Neetu, K.-S., et al. Characterization of promoter of Terminal Flower1 (TFL1) gene of Arabidopsis. Res. J. Biotechnol. 9 (2014), 35–40.
Bouché, F., et al. Integrating roots into a whole plant network of flowering time genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 29042.
Lachowiec, J., et al. A genome-wide association analysis reveals epistatic cancellation of additive genetic variance for root length in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1005541.
Liu, Y.Y., et al. Revisiting the phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP) gene family reveals cryptic FLOWERING LOCUS T gene homologs in gymnosperms and sheds new light on functional evolution. New Phytol. 212 (2016), 730–744.
