[en] Our interest lies in quality control for clinical trials, in the context of risk-based monitoring (RBM). We specifically study the use of central statistical monitoring (CSM) to support RBM. Under an RBM paradigm, we claim that CSM has a key role to play in identifying the “risks to the most critical data elements and processes” that will drive targeted oversight. In order to support this claim, we first see how to characterize the risks that may affect clinical trials. We then discuss how CSM can be understood as a tool for providing a set of data-driven key risk indicators (KRIs), which help to organize adaptive targeted monitoring. Several case studies are provided where issues in a clinical trial have been identified thanks to targeted investigation after the identification of a risk using CSM. Using CSM to build data-driven KRIs helps to identify different kinds of issues in clinical trials. This ability is directly linked with the exhaustiveness of the CSM approach and its flexibility in the definition of the risks that are searched for when identifying the KRIs. In practice, a CSM assessment of the clinical database seems essential to ensure data quality. The atypical data patterns found in some centers and variables are seen as KRIs under a RBM approach. Targeted monitoring or data management queries can be used to confirm whether the KRIs point to an actual issue or not.
Disciplines :
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others Human health sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Timmermans, Catherine ; Université Catholique de Louvain - UCL > Institut de Statistique, Biostatistique et Sciences Actuarielles (ISBA)
Venet, David; Université Libre de Bruxelles - ULB > IRIDIA
Burzykowski, Tomasz; Hasselt University ; International Drug Development Institute
Language :
English
Title :
Data-driven risk identification in phase III clinical trials using central statistical monitoring
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
European Commission (2005) Commission directive 2005/28/EC. Off J Eur Union L91:13–19
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (1996) Guidelines for good clinical practices E6(R1). http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R1_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2015
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (2013) Guidance for industry: oversight of clinical investigations—a risk-based approach to monitoring. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM269919.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2015
Duley L, Antman K, Arena J et al (2008) Specific barriers to the conduct of randomized trials. Clin Trials 5:40–48
De S (2011) Hybrid approaches to clinical trial monitoring: practical alternatives to 100% source data verification. Perspect Clin Res 2:100–104
Tudur Smith C, Stocken DD, Dunn J et al (2012) The value of source data verification in a cancer clinical trial. PLoS One 7:e51623
Buyse M (2014) Centralized statistical monitoring as a way to improve the quality of clinical trials. Appl Clin Trials. http://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/centralized-statistical-monitoring-way-improve-quality-clinical-data
Bakobaki JM, Rauchenberger M, Joffe N et al (2012) The potential for central monitoring techniques to replace on-site monitoring: findings from an international multi-centre clinical trial. Clin Trials 9:257–264
Morrison BW, Cochran CJ, White JG et al (2011) Monitoring the quality of conduct of clinical trials: a survey of current practices. Clin Trials 8:342–349
European Medicines Agency (2011). Reflection paper on risk based quality management in clinical trials. EMA/INS/GCP/394194/2011. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2011/08/WC500110059.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2015
Baigent C, Harrell FE, Buyse M et al (2008) Ensuring trial validity by data quality assurance and diversification of monitoring methods. Clin Trials 5:49–55
George SL, Buyse M (2015) Data fraud in clinical trials. Clin Investig (Lond) 5:161–173
Venet D, Doffagne E, Burzykowski T et al (2012) A statistical approach to central monitoring of data quality in clinical trials. Clin Trials 9:705–713
Desmet L, Venet D, Doffagne E et al (2014) Linear mixed-effects models for central statistical monitoring of multicenter clinical trials. Stat Med 33:5265–5279
Timmermans C, Doffagne E, Venet D et al (2015) Using central statistical monitoring to assess data quality and consistency in the stomach cancer adjuvant multi-institutional group trial (SAMIT). In submission
Desmet L, Venet D, Doffagne E et al (2015) Use of the beta-binomial model for central statistical monitoring of multicenter clinical trials. In submission
Kirkwood AA, Cox T, Hackshaw A (2013) Application of methods for central statistical monitoring in clinical trials. Clin Trials 10:783–806
Edwards P, Shakur H, Barnetson L et al (2013) Central and statistical data monitoring in the Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage (CRASH-2) trial. Clin Trials 11:336–343
Pogue JM, Devereaux PJ, Thorlund K et al (2013) Central statistical monitoring: detecting fraud in clinical trials. Clin Trials 10:225–235
Al-Marzouki S, Evans S, Marshall T et al (2005) Are these data real? Statistical methods for the detection of data fabrication in clinical trials. BMJ 331:267–270
The SYMPHONY Investigators (2000) Comparison of sibrafiban with aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes: a randomised trial. Sibrafiban versus aspirin to yield maximum protection from ischemic heart events post-acute coronary syndromes. Lancet 355:337–345
Altman DG (2000) Randomisation in the SYMPHONY trial. Lancet 356:1521–1522
The SYMPHONY Investigators (2000) Author’s reply to randomisation in the symphony trial. Lancet 356:1521–1522
Peto R, Collins R, Sackett D et al (1997) The trials of Dr. Bernard Fisher: a European perspective on an American episode. Control Clin Trials 18:1–13
European Stroke Prevention Study 2 Group (1997) European Stroke Prevention Study 2. Efficacy and safety data. J Neurol Sci 151(Suppl): S1–S77
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.