Realist evaluation of the role of the Universal Health Coverage Partnership in strengthening policy dialogue for health planning and financing: A protocol
[en] Introduction: In 2011, WHO, the European Union and
Luxembourg entered into a collaborative agreement to
support policy dialogue for health planning and financing;
these were acknowledged as core areas in need of
targeted support in countries’ quest towards universal
health coverage (UHC). Entitled ‘Universal Health Coverage
Partnership’, this intervention is intended to strengthen
countries’ capacity to develop, negotiate, implement,
monitor and evaluate robust and integrated national health
policies oriented towards UHC. It is a complex intervention
involving a multitude of actors working on a significant
number of remarkably diverse activities in different
countries.
Methods and analysis: The researchers will conduct a
realist evaluation to answer the following question: How, in
what contexts, and triggering what mechanisms, does the
Partnership support policy dialogue for health planning and
financing towards UHC? A qualitative multiple case study
will be undertaken in Togo, Liberia, Democratic Republic
of Congo, Cape Verde, Burkina Faso and Niger. Three steps
will be implemented: (1) formulating context–mechanism–
outcome explanatory propositions to guide data collection,
based on expert knowledge and theoretical literature;
(2) collecting empirical data through semistructured
interviews with key informants and observations of key
events, and analysing data; (3) specifying the intervention
theory.
Ethics and dissemination: The primary target audiences
are WHO and its partner countries; international and
national stakeholders involved in or supporting policy
dialogues in the health sector, especially in low-income
countries; and researchers with interest in UHC, policy
dialogue, evaluation research and/or realist evaluation.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Robert, Emilie
Ridde, Valery
Rajan, Dheepa
Sam, Omar
Drave, Mamadou
Porignon, Denis ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique : aspects spécifiques
Language :
English
Title :
Realist evaluation of the role of the Universal Health Coverage Partnership in strengthening policy dialogue for health planning and financing: A protocol
Schmets G, Rajan D, Kadandale S. Strategizing national health in the 21st century: A handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016.
Evans T, Pablos-Méndez A. Shaping of a new era for health financing. Lancet 2016;387:2482-4.
World Health Organization. Health Systems Strengthening: Glossary. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2011.
Rajan D, Adam T, El Husseiny D, et al. Briefing Note-Policy dialogue: what it is and how it can contribute to evidence-informed decision-making. Geneva: WHO, 2015.
Uneke CJ, Ezeoha AE, Ndukwe CD, et al. Enhancing leadership and governance competencies to strengthen health systems in Nigeria: Assessment of organizational human resources development. Healthc Policy 2012;7:73-84.
Quinn M. Governance and health in post-conflict countries: The Ebola outbreak in Liberia and Sierra Leone. New York: International Peace Institute, 2016.
Nabyonga-Orem J, Ota M, Mwisongo A, et al. Health policy dialogue: lessons from Africa. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16.
Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Oxman AD, et al. SUPPORT Tools for evidenceinformed health Policymaking (STP) 14: organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2009;7:514-9.
Uneke CJ, Ebeh Ezeoha A, Uro-Chukwu H, et al. Promoting evidence to policy link on the control of infectious diseases of poverty in Nigeria: outcome of a multi-stakeholders policy dialogue. Health Promot Perspect 2015;5:104-15.
Drechsel P, Cofie OO, Van Veenhuizen R, et al. Linking research, capacity building, and policy dialogue in support of informal irrigation in urban West Africa. Irrig Drain 2008;57:268-78.
Babu SC, Ergeneman A. Policy dialogue with Indian parliamentarians: outcomes and lessons from the CGIAR. J Int Commun 2005;11:41-54.
Nabyonga-Orem J, Dovlo D, Kwamie A, et al. Policy dialogue to improve health outcomes in low income countries: what are the issues and way forward? BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:217.
Kwamie A, Nabyonga-Orem J. Improved harmonisation from policy dialogue? Realist perspectives from Guinea and Chad. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:222.
Molenaers N. The Great Divide? Donor perceptions of budget support, eligibility and policy dialogue. Third World Q 2012;33:791-806.
Ade N, Réne A, Khalifa M, et al. Coordination of the health policy dialogue process in Guinea: pre-And post-Ebola. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16 Suppl 4:220.
White LG. Policy reforms in sub-Saharan Africa: conditions for establishing a dialogue. Stud Comp Int Dev 1990;25:24-42.
Scholten P, Verbeek S. Politicization and expertise: changing research-policy dialogues on migrant integration in Europe. Science and Public Policy 2015;42:188-200.
Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Gauvin FP. Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1287.
Baumann C, White S. Collaborative stakeholder dialogue: A catalyst for better transport policy choices. Int J Sustain Transp 2015;9:30-8.
Susskind L, Hoben M. Making regional policy dialogues work: A credo for metro-scale consensus building. Temp Envtl Law & Tech J 2004:123-38.
Perin E. Au coeur du dialogue social sectoriel européen: entre coordination européenne et négociations nationales: Analyse de la mise en oeuvre des textes de nouvelle génération. Université catholique de Louvain 2014.
Executive Board of the World Health Assembly. Strengthening national policy dialogue to build more robust health policies, strategies and plans EB128R12: Executive Board of the World Health Assembly, 2011.
Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications, 1997.
Lacouture A, Breton E, Guichard A, et al. The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: A scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation. Implement Sci 2015;10:153.
Jones J, Barry MM. Exploring the relationship between synergy and partnership functioning factors in health promotion partnerships. Health Promot Int 2011;26:408-20.
Christopoulos D, Ingold K. Exceptional or just well connected? Political entrepreneurs and brokers in policy making. European Political Science Review 2015;7:475-98.
Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 5 edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.
Lasker RD, Weiss ES, Miller R. Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Q 2001;79:179-205. III-IV.
Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q 2012;90:311-46.
Robert E, Ridde V Policy dialogue (dialogue sur les politiques): une synthèse exploratoire des écrits scientifiques. Cahiers REALISME 2018;16.
Pires A. Echantillonnage et recherche qualitative: essai théorique et méthodologique. In: Poupart J, Deslauriers J-P, Groulx L-H, eds. La recherche qualitative: Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Montréal, QC: Gaëtan Morin, 1997:113-69.
Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy Plan 2000;15:239-46.
Abimbola S, Molemodile SK, Okonkwo OA, et al. The government cannot do it all alone: realist analysis of the minutes of community health committee meetings in Nigeria. Health Policy Plan 2016;31:332-45.
Bhaskar R. Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso, 1989.
Trimarchi M. Theory building: A realist methodology for case study driven research Faculty of Business Working Paper Series. Sippy Downs, Australia: University of the Sunshine Coast, 1998:19-35.
Bhaskar R. Scientific realism and human emancipation. London, United Kingdom: Verso, 1986.
Yeung HW-chung, Wai-chung Yeung H. Critical realism and realist research in human geography: A method or a philosophy in search of a method? Prog Hum Geogr 1997;21:51-74.
McEvoy P, Richards D. A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. J Res Nurs 2006;11:66-78.
Pawson R. Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications, 2006.
Nabyonga-Orem J, Ousman K, Estrelli Y, et al. Perspectives on health policy dialogue: definition, perceived importance and coordination. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16 Suppl 4:218.