ORBi: Detailled Reference

Article (Scientific journals)

Measuring dating violence: Conflict or non-conflict related instructions?

Courtain, Audrey; Glowacz, Fabienne

2019 • In European Review of Applied Psychology, 69, p. 1-8

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/231539

DOI
10.1016/j.erap.2018.11.001

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

10. Courtain & Glowacz 2018 - Measuring dating violence.pdf

Publisher postprint (526.81 kB)

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

dating violence; conflict; situational couple violence

Abstract :

[en] Introduction. – Dating violence, as well as the broader field of intimate partner violence, has mainly been investigated with two conflict-related questionnaires (Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationship Inventory CADRI, Conflict Tactics Scale CTS). Indeed, the respondents have to report aggressive behaviors that occurred in a context of conflict. Such conflict-related instructions prevent us from investigating violence occurring outside a context of conflict. Objective. – The aim of the study was to explore whether the use of a conflict-related or a non-conflict-related version of the CADRI could impact dating violence prevalences and scores, and to investigate conceptual issues associated with conflict-related questionnaires.Method. – A total of 186 participants ranging in age from 16 to 23 years (M = 18.93, SD = 1.52, 64.5%girls) were administered a new version of the CADRI (i.e. with non-conflict related instructions) and then the original version of the CADRI (i.e. with conflict-related instructions). The instrument investigated threatening behaviors, relational, physical, sexual and verbal dating violence. Results. – For several forms of dating violence, prevalence rates and scores decreased from the non-conflict-related version to the conflict-related version: males showed more frequent drops than females.There were more frequent gender differences for rates and scores on the conflict-related version than onthe non-conflict-related version. Conclusion. – The use of non-conflict-related instructions is an opportunity not to limit the study of dating violence to behaviors occurring during a conflict or an argument. It allows a broader understanding ofdating violence beyond any conflict-related instruction.

Disciplines :

Theoretical & cognitive psychology

Author, co-author :

Courtain, Audrey ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychol. de la Délinqu.,des inadapt.soc.& proces.d'insert.

Glowacz, Fabienne ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychol. de la Délinqu.,des inadapt.soc.& proces.d'insert.

Language :

English

Title :

Measuring dating violence: Conflict or non-conflict related instructions?

Alternative titles :

[fr] Évaluer la violence dans les relations amoureuses : des instructions relatives ou non relatives à un contexte de conflit ?

Publication date :

2019

Journal title :

European Review of Applied Psychology

ISSN :

1162-9088

eISSN :

1878-3457

Publisher :

Centre de Psychologie appliquée, France

Volume :

69

Pages :

1-8

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique

Available on ORBi :

since 16 January 2019

Statistics

Number of views

98 (17 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

7 (4 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

7

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

5

OpenCitations

3

OpenAlex citations

8

Bibliography

Ackard, D.M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Date violence and date rape among adolescents: associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(5), 2002, 455, 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00322-8.
Archer, J., Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 126 (2000), 651–680, 10.1037//0033-2909.126.5.65.
Beretta, L., Santaniello, A., Nearest neighbor imputation algorithms: a critical evaluation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16(Suppl 3), 2016, 74, 10.1186/s12911-016-0318-z.
Cascardi, M., Muzyczyn, B., Concordant responding on the Physical Assault/Abuse Subscales of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales 2 and Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychology of Violence 6:2 (2016), 303–312, 10.1037/a0039128.
Cascardi, M., Vivian, D., Context for specific episodes of marital violence: gender and severity of violence differences. Journal of Family Violence 10:3 (1995), 265–293, 10.1007/BF02110993.
Caulfield, M.B., Riggs, D.S., The assessment of dating aggression: empirical evaluation of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 7:4 (1992), 549–558, 10.1177/088626092007004010.
Cormier, R.A., The Conflict Tactics Scale: assessing the meaning, context, and consequences of partner violence. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 1995 [Paper 3802].
Courtain, A., Glowacz, F., Exploration of Dating Violence and Related Attitudes Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2018, 10.1177/0886260518770185.
Crick, N.R., Grotpeter, J.K., Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development 66 (1994), 710–722.
De Koker, P., Mathews, C., Zuch, M., Bastien, S., Mason-Jones, A.J., A systematic review of interventions for preventing adolescent intimate partner violence. Journal of Adolescent Health 54:1 (2014), 3–13, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.08.008.
Dekeseredy, W.S., Schwartz, M.D., Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: a critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales (Applied Research Forum, National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women). 1998 http://stoprelationshipabuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/A-Critique-of-the-Conflict-Tactics-Scales.pdf [Retrieved June, 2, 2016].
Dobash, R.P., Dobash, R.E., Wilson, M., Daly, M., The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems 39 (1992), 71–91, 10.2307/3096914.
Exner-Cortens, D., Gill, L., Eckenrode, J., Measurement of adolescent dating violence: a comprehensive review (Part 1, behaviors). Aggression and Violent Behavior 27 (2016), 64–78, 10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.007.
Gagné M., Lavoie, F., Young people's views on the causes of violence in adolescents’ romantic relationships. Canada's Mental Health 41 (1993), 11–15.
Giordano, P.C., Soto, D.A., Manning, W.D., Longmore, M.A., The characteristics of romantic relationships associated with teen dating violence. Social Science Research 39:6 (2010), 863–874, 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.03.009.
Guerrero, L.K., Andersen, P.A., Afifi, W.A., Close encounters: communicating in close relationships. 2001, Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View, CA.
Hamby, S., The gender debate about intimate partner violence: solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 1:1 (2009), 24–34, 10.1037/a0015066.
Hamby, S., Intimate partner and sexual violence research: scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 15:3 (2014), 149–158.
Hamby, S., Self-report measures that do not produce gender parity in intimate partner violence: a Multi-Study Investigation. Psychol Violence 6:2 (2016), 323–335, 10.1037/a003820.
Hamby, S., A scientific answer to a scientific question. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 18:2 (2017), 145–154, 10.1177/1524838015596963.
Hampel, P., Petermann, F., Perceived stress, coping, and adjustment in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health 38:4 (2006), 409–415, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.02.014.
Jackson, S.M., Cram, F., Seymour, F.W., Violence and sexual coercion in high school students’ dating relationships. Journal of Family Violence 15 (2000), 23–36, 10.1023/A:1007545302987.
Johnson, M.P., Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family 57:2 (1995), 283–294, 10.2307/353683.
Johnson, M.P., Conflict and control gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women 12:11 (2006), 1003–1018, 10.1177/1077801206293328.
Johnson, M.P., Leone, J.M., The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues 26:3 (2005), 322–349, 10.1177/1077801214521324.
Johnson, M.P., Leone, J.M., Xu, X., Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women 20:2 (2014), 186–207, 10.1177/1077801214521324.
Jönsson, P., Wohlin, C., An evaluation of k-nearest neighbour imputation Using Likert Data, 10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, Septembre 11–17, 2004, Chicago, USA, 10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357895 http://www.wohlin.eu/metrics04.pdf [Retrieved on June 15 in 2017].
Josephson, W.L., Proulx, J.B., Violence in young adolescents’ relationships: a path model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 23:2 (2008), 189–208, 10.1177/0886260507309340.
Kimmel, M.S., “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: a Substantive and Methodological Research Review. Violence Against Women 8:11 (2002), 1332–1363, 10.1177/107780102762478037.
Lavoie, F., Robitaille, L., Hébert, M., Teen dating relationships and aggression: an exploratory study. Violence Against Women 6:1 (2000), 6–36, 10.1177/10778010022181688.
Lavoie, F., Vézina, L., Piché C., Boivin, M., Evaluation of a prevention program for violence in teen dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 10 (1995), 516–524, 10.1177/088626095010004009.
Leen, E., Sorbring, E., Mawer, M., Holdsworth, E., Helsing, B., Bowen, E., Prevalence, dynamic risk factors and the efficacy of primary interventions for adolescent dating violence: an international review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 18 (2013), 159–174, 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.015.
Lundeberg, K., Stith, S.M., Penn, C.E., Ward, D.B., A comparison of nonviolent, psychologically violent, and physically violent male college daters. Journal of interpersonal Violence 19:10 (2004), 1191–1200, 10.1177/0886260504269096.
Makepeace, J.M., Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations 30 (1981), 97–102.
Marasca, A.R., Falcke, D., Forms of violence in the affective-sexual relationships of adolescents. Interpersona 9:2 (2015), 200–214, 10.5964/ijprv9i2.176.
McGregor, H., Conceptualising male violence against female partners. Australia New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 11 (1990), 65–90, 10.1002/j.1467-8438.1990.tb00793.x.
Messinger, A.M., Fry, D.A., Rickert, V.I., Catallozzi, M., Davidson, L.L., Extending Johnson's Intimate Partner Violence Typology: lessons from an adolescent sample. Violence Against Women 20:8 (2014), 948–971, 10.1177/1077801214546907.
Moffitt, T.E., Caspi, A., Krueger, R.F., Magdol, L., Margolin, G., Silva, P.A., et al. Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment 9 (1997), 47–56, 10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.47.
Molidor, C.E., Tolman, R.M., Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence. Violence Against Women 4 (1998), 180–194, 10.1177/1077801298004002004.
Niolon, P.H., Vivolo-Kantor, A.M., Latzman, N.E., Valle, L.A., Kuoh, H., Burton, T., et al. Prevalence of teen dating violence and co-occurring risk factors among middle school youth in high-risk urban communities. Journal of Adolescent Health 56:2 (2015), S5–S13, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.019.
Peterson, D.R., Conflict. Kelley, H.H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Christensen, A., Harvey, J.H., Huston, T.L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L.A., Peterson, D.R., (eds.) Close relationships, 1983, Freeman, New York, 360–396.
Pietri, M., Bonnet, A., Analysis of early representations and personality among victims of domestic violence. European Review of Applied Psychology 67:4 (2017), 199–206, 10.1016/j.erap.2017.04.001.
Sears, H.A., Byers, E.S., Whelan, J.J., Saint-Pierre, M., the Dating Violence Research Team. “If it hurts you, then it's not a joke”: adolescents’ ideas about girls’ and boys’ use and experience of abusive behavior in dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 21:9 (2006), 1191–1207.
Sears, H.A., Byers, E.S., Adolescent girls’ and boys’ experiences of psychologically, physically, and sexually aggressive behaviors in their dating relationships: co-occurrence and emotional reaction. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 19:5 (2010), 517–539, 10.1080/10926771.2010.495035.
Shaughnessy, J.J., Zechmeister, E.B., Zechmeister, J.S., Research Methods in Psychology. 9th Ed., 2012, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Smith, J., Mulford, C., Latzman, N.E., Tharp, A.T., Niolon, P.H., Blachman-Demner, D., Taking stock of behavioral measures of adolescent dating violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 24:6 (2015), 674–692, 10.1080/10926771.2015.1049767.
Sontag, L.M., Graber, J.A., Coping with perceived peer stress: gender-specific and common pathways to symptoms of psychopathology. Developmental Psychology 46:6 (2010), 1605–1620, 10.1037/a0020617.
Straus, M.A., Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and Family 41 (1979), 75–88, 10.2307/351733.
Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., Sugarman, D.B., The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues 17:3 (1996), 283–316, 10.1177/019251396017003001.
Straus, M.A., The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics: an evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. Straus, M.A., Gelles, R.J., (eds.) Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8145 families, 1990, Transaction Publishing, New Brunswick, NJ, 49–73.
Temple, J.R., Shorey, R.C., Tortolero, S.R., Wolfe, D.A., Stuart, G.L., Importance of gender and attitudes about violence in the relationship between exposure to interparental violence and the perpetration of teen dating violence. Child Abuse and Neglect 37:5 (2013), 343–352, 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.02.001.
Temple, J.R., Weston, R., Marshall, L.L., Physical and mental health outcomes of women in nonviolent, unilaterally violent, and mutually violent relationships. Violence and Victims 20:3 (2005), 335–359.
Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N., Extent, nature and consequences of rape victimization: findings from the National Violence against Women Survey. 2006, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
Vagi, K.J., Rothman, E.F., Latzman, N.E., Tharp, A.T., Hall, D.M., Breiding, M.J., Beyond correlates: a review of risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence perpetration. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 42:4 (2013), 633–649, 10.1007/s10964-013-9907-7.
Wincentak, K., Connolly, J., Card, N., Teen dating violence: a meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychology of Violence 7:2 (2016), 224–241, 10.1037/a0040194.
Winstok, Z., Critical review of Hamby's (2014) article titled “Intimate partner and sexual violence research, scientific progress, scientific challenges, and gender”. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 2015, 1–11, 10.1177/1524838015596962.
Wolfe, D.A., Scott, K., Reitzel-Jaffe, D., Wekerle, C., Grasley, C., Straatman, A.L., Development and validation of the conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory. Psychological Assessment 13:2 (2001), 277–293, 10.1037/1040-3590.13.2.277.
Wood, J.T., Gendered lives: communication, gender and culture. 2011, Wadsworth Cenage Learning, Boston, MA.
Zweig, J.M., Yahner, J., Dank, M., Lachman, P., Can Johnson's typology of adult partner violence apply to teen dating violence?. Journal of Marriage and Family 76:4 (2014), 808–825, 10.1111/jomf.12121.

Similar publications