Request a copy

Full Text

• Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G.D., Venture capital in emerging economies: networks and institutional change. Enterp. Theory Pract. 30:2 (2006), 299–320.
• Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G., Yeh, K., Venture capital in China: past, present, and future. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 24:3 (2007), 247–268.
• Aidis, R., Estrin, S., Institutions, networks, and entrepreneurship development in Russia: an exploration, William Davidson Institute working paper no. 833. Retrieved from, on 8 November 2017 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=924422, 2006.
• Akcura, M.T., Avci, S.B., How to make global cities: information communication technologies and macro-level variables. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 89 (2014), 68–79.
• Arnold, D.J., Quelch, J.A., New strategies in emerging markets. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 40:1 (1998), 7–20.
• Berrone, P., Ricart, J.E., Carrasco, C., The open kimono: toward a general framework for open data initiatives in cities. Calif. Manag. Rev. 59:1 (2016), 39–70.
• Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D., An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: explaining the difference between China and the West. J. Bus. Ventur. 18:2 (2003), 233–259.
• Bruton, G., Rubanik, Y., Resources of the firm. Russian high-technology start-ups, and firm growth. J. Bus. Ventur. 17 (2002), 553–576.
• Bruton, G., Dess, G., Janney, G., Knowledge management in technology-focused firms in emerging economies: caveats on capabilities, networks, and real options. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 24:2 (2007), 115–130.
• Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D., Obloj, K., Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: where are we today and where should the research go in the future?. Enterp. Theory Pract. 32:1 (2008), 1–14.
• Calzada, I., Cobo, C., Unplugging: deconstructing the smart city. J. Urban Technol. 22:1 (2015), 23–43.
• Cheng, J., Xu, L.D., Chen, W., Tao, F., Lin, C., Industrial IoT in 5G environment towards smart manufacturing. J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 2018, 10.1016/j.jii.2018.04.001.
• Civerchia, F., Bocchino, S., Salvadori, C., Rossi, E., Maggiani, L., Petracca, M., Industrial internet of things monitoring solution for advanced predictive maintenance applications. J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 2017, 10.1016/j.jii.2017.02.003.
• Cohen, B., Almirall, E., Chesbrought, H., The city as a lab: open innovation meets the collaborative economy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 59:1 (2016), 5–13.
• Datta, A., New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogue Hum. Geogr. 5:1 (2015), 3–22.
• Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., The regulation of entry. Q. J. Econ. 117 (2002), 1–37.
• Florida, R., Cities and the Creative Class. 2005, Routledge, London.
• Florida, R., Mellander, C., Rise of the startup city: the changing geography of the venture capital financed innovation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 59:1 (2016), 14–38.
• George, G., Prabhu, G.N., Developmental financial institutions as technology policy instruments: implications for innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Res. Policy 32 (2003), 89–108.
• Glasmeier, A., Christopherson, S., Thinking about smart cities. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 8 (2015), 3–12.
• Golafshani, N., Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual. Rep. 8:4 (2003), 597–606.
• Gupta, A., Red Tape: bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. 2012, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
• Hamzah, Z.L., Alwi, S.F.S., Othman, M.N., Designing corporate brand experience in an online context: a qualitative insight. J. Bus. Res. 67:11 (2014), 2299–2310.
• Hannah, D.R., Robertson, K., Why and how do employees break and bend confidential information protection rules?. J. Manag. Stud. 52:3 (2015), 381–413.
• Healy, M., Perry, C., Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qual. Mark. Res. 3:3 (2000), 118–126.
• Hollands, R.G., Will the real smart city please stand up?. City 12:3 (2008), 303–320.
• Hollands, R.G., (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 8, 61–77.
• Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C.M., Wright, M., Strategy in emerging economies. Acad. Manag. J. 43:3 (2000), 249–267.
• Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15:9 (2005), 1277–1288.
• Hultman, M., Yaboah-Banin, A.A., Formaniuk, L., Demand-and supply-side perspectives of city branding: a qualitative investigation. J. Bus. Res. 69:11 (2016), 5153–5157.
• Ianuale, N., Schiavon, D., Capobianco, E., Smart cities and urban networks: smart networks what we need?. J. Manag. Anal. 2:4 (2015), 285–294.
• Isenberg, D.J., How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harv. Bus. Rev.(June), 2010, 1–11.
• Kitchin, R., The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79:1 (2014), 1–14.
• Kummitha, R.K.R., Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: why smart city planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?. Tech. Forcasting Soc. Chang. 137 (2018), 330–339.
• Kummitha, R.K.R., Crutzen, N., How do we understand smart cities: an evolutionary perspective. Cities 67 (2017), 43–52.
• Lee, S.M., Peterson, S.J., Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. J. World Bus. 35:4 (2000), 401–416.
• Leydesdorff, L., Deakin, M., The triple-helix model of smart cities: a neoevolutionary perspective. J. Urban Technol. 18 (2011), 3–63.
• Li, L., China's manufacturing locus in 2025: with a compassion of “made in China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 2017, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.028.
• Li, S., Xu, L.D., Zhao, S., 5G Internet of things: a survey. J. Ind. Inf. Integr.(2018), 2018, 10.1016/j.jii.2018.01.005.
• Luque-Ayala, A., Marvin, S., Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism?. Urban Stud. 52:12 (2015), 2105–2116.
• Manovala, T.S., Eunni, R.V., Gyoshev, B., Institutional Environments for Entrepreneurship: Evidence From Emerging Economies in Eastern Europe. Enterp. Theory Pract. 32:1 (2008), 203–218.
• March, H., The smart city and other ICT-led techno-imaginaries: any room for dialogue with degrowth?. J. Clean. Prod. 197:2 (2018), 1694–1703.
• Martin, C.J., Evans, J., Karvonen, A., Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 133 (2018), 269–278.
• Munoz, P., Cohen, B., The making of the urban entrepreneur. Calif. Manag. Rev. 59:1 (2016), 71–91.
• Musteen, M., Behavioral factors in offshoring decisions: a qualitative analysis. J. Bus. Res. 69:9 (2016), 3439–3446.
• Nam, T., Pardo, T.A., Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Retrieved from https://inta-aivn.org/images/cc/Urbanism/background%20documents/dgo_2011_smartcity.pdf, 2011.
• North, D., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Nylund, P.A., Cohen, B., Collision density: driving growth in urban entrepreneurial ecosystems. Int. Entrep. Manag. J., 2016, 10.1007/s11365-016-0424-5.
• Patton, M.Q., Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd ed., 2002, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Peng, M.W., Business Strategies in Transition Economies. 2000, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Reay, T., Publishing qualitative research. Fam. Bus. Rev. 27:2 (2014), 95–102.
• Scott, W.R., Institutions and Organisations. 1995, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Shelton, T., Zook, M., Wiig, A., The ‘actually existing smart city’. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 8 (2015), 13–25.
• Siqueira, A.C.O., Bruton, G.D., High-technology entrepreneurship in emerging economies: firm informality and contextualization of resource-based theory. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 57:1 (2010), 39–50.
• Snow, C.C., Hakonsson, D.D., Obel, B., A smart city is a collaborative community: lessons from smart Aarhus. Calif. Manag. Rev. 59:1 (2016), 92–108.
• Spigel, B., The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Enterp. Theory Pract. 41:1 (2017), 49–72.
• Suddaby, R., From the editors: what grounded theory is not. Acad. Manag. J. 49:4 (2006), 633–642.
• United Nations, World urbanisation prospects. (Retrieved from, on 10 August 2016) https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf, 2014.
• van Waart, P., Mulder, I., de Bont, C., A participatory approach for envisioning a smart city. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 2015, 10.1177/0894439315611099.
• Visnjic, I., Neely, A., Cennamo, C., Visnjic, N., Governing the city: unleashing value from the business ecosystem. Calif. Manag. Rev. 59:1 (2016), 109–140.
• Wright, M., Robbie, K., Venture capital and private equity: a review and synthesis. J. Financ. Account. 25:5-6 (1998), 521–570.
• Xu, B., Xu, L.D., Cai, H., Xie, C., Hu, J., Bu, F., Ubiquitous data assessing method in IoT-Based information system for emergency medical services. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 10:2 (2014), 1578–1586.
• Xu, L.D., He, W., Li, S., Internet of things in industries: a survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 10:4 (2014), 2233–2243.
• Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M.W., Deeds, D.L., What drives new ventures to internationalise from emerging to developed economies?. Enterp. Theory Pract. 32:1 (2008), 59–82.
• Yigitcanlar, T., Lee, S.H., Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: a smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 89 (2014), 100–114.