[en] Gene content is the number of copies of a particular allele in a genotype of an animal. Gene content can be used to study additive gene action of candidate gene. Usually genotype data are available only for a part of population and for the rest gene contents have to be calculated based on typed relatives. Methods to calculate expected gene content for animals on large complex pedigrees are relatively complex. in this paper we proposed a practical method to calculate gene content using a linear regression. The method does not estimate genotype probabilities but these can be approximated from gene content assuming Hardy-Weinberg proportions. The approach was compared with other methods on multiple simulated data sets for real bovine pedigrees of 1082 and 907 903 animals. Different allelic frequencies (0.4 and 0.2) and proportions of the missing genotypes (90, 70, and 50%) were considered in simulation. The simulation showed that the proposed method has similar capability to predict gene content as the iterative peeling method, however it requires less time and can be more practical for large pedigrees. The method was also applied to real data on the bovine myostatin locus on a large dual-purpose Belgian Blue pedigree of 235 133 animals. It was demonstrated that the proposed method can be easily adapted for particular pedigrees.
Disciplines :
Genetics & genetic processes Animal production & animal husbandry
Author, co-author :
Gengler, Nicolas ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech > Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech
Mayeres, P.
Szydlowski, M.
Language :
English
Title :
A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle
Publication date :
2007
Journal title :
Animal
ISSN :
1751-7311
eISSN :
1751-732X
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Banos G, Wiggans GR and Powell RL 2001. Impact of paternity errors in cow identification on genetic evaluations and international comparisons. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2523-2529.
Charlier C, Coppieters W, Farnir F, Grobet L, Leroy PL, Michaux C, Mni M, Schwers A, Vanmanshoven P, Hanset R and Georges M 1995. The mh gene causing double-muscling in cattle maps to bovine chromosome 2. Mammalian Genome 6, 788-792.
Elston RC and Stewart J 1971. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Human Heredity 21, 523-542.
Fernandez SA, Fernando RL, Guldbrandtsen B, Totir LR and Carriquiry AL 2001. Sampling genotypes in large pedigrees with loops. Genetics Selection Evolution 33, 337-367.
Gianola D 1980. A method of sire evaluation for dichotomies. Journal of Animal Science 51, 1266-1271.
Hasstedt SJ 2002. Pedigree analysis package, revision 5.0 edition. In Department of Human Genetics. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Hoeschele I 1986. Estimation of breeding values and variance components with quasi-continuos data. Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat Hohenheim, Germany.
Israel C and Weller JI 1998. Estimation of candidate gene effects in dairy cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1653-1662.
Janss LLG, Van Arendonk JAM and Van der Werf JHJ 1995. Computing approximate monogenic model likelihoods in large pedigrees with loops. Genetics Selection Evolution 27, 567-579.
Kong A 1991. Analysis of pedigree data using methods combining peeling abd Gibbs sampling. In Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd symposium on the Interface (eds EM Keramidas and SM Kaufman), pp. 379-385. Interface Foundation of North America, Fairfax Station, VA.
Lange K and Goradia TM 1987. An algorithm for automatic genotype elimination. American Journal of Human Genetics 40, 250-256.
Lauritzen SL and Sheehan NA 2003. Graphical models for genetic analyses. Statistical Science 18, 489-514.
Misztal I 1999. Complex models, more data: simpler programming? Proceedings of the Interbull Workshop Computers and Cattle Breeds, Tuusala, Finland. Interbull Bulletin 20, 33-42.
O'Connell JR and Weeks DE 1995. The VITESSE algorithm for rapid exact multilocus linkage analysis via genotype set-recoding and fuzzy inheritance. Nature Genetics 11, 402-408.
Thallman RM, Bennett GL, Keele JW and Kappes SM 2001. Efficient computation of genotype probabilities for loci with many alleles: II. Iterative method for large, complex pedigrees. Journal of Animal Science 79, 34-44.
Totir LR, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM, Fernandez SA and Guldbrandtsen B 2003. A comparison of alternative methods to compute conditional genotype probabilities for genetic evaluation with finite locus models. Genetics Selection Evolution 35, 585-604.
Thompson E 1981. Pedigree analysis of Hodgkin's disease in a Newfoundland genealogy. Annals of Human Genetics 45, 279-292.
Van Arendonk JAM, Smith C and Kennedy BW 1989. Method to estimate genotype probabilities at individual loci in farm livestock. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 78, 735-740.
Wang T, Fernando RL, Stricker C and Elston RC 1996. An approximation to the likelihood for a pedigree with loops. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93, 1299-1309.
Westell RA, Quaas LR and Van Vleck LD 1988. Genetic groups in an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 1310-1318.