Syncope aux Urgences: Diagnostic differentiel et stratification du risque.

Marechal, P.; Scheen, André; Lancellotti, Patrizio

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Syncope aux Urgences: Diagnostic differentiel et stratification du risque.

Marechal, P.; Scheen, André; Lancellotti, Patrizio

2018 • In Revue Médicale de Liège, 73 (5-6), p. 237-242

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/230421

PubMed
29926561

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

20180506_04.pdf

Publisher postprint (485.3 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Risk stratification; Sudden cardiac death; Syncope

Abstract :

[en] Syncope is one of the most common reasons of emergency admission and hospitalisation. Management of syncope remains challenging for the medical staff as there are a multitude of possible etiologies ranging from benign to potentially life-threatening causes. Historically, 30-40% of patients presenting for syncope are hospitalized for further exploration, resulting in a significant cost to health care. The purpose of this article is to clarify the etiologies of syncope and to stratify their risk for a better managment.

Disciplines :

Cardiovascular & respiratory systems

Author, co-author :

Marechal, P.

Scheen, André ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Département des sciences cliniques

Lancellotti, Patrizio ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Cardiologie - Pathologie spéciale et réhabilitation

Language :

French

Title :

Syncope aux Urgences: Diagnostic differentiel et stratification du risque.

Alternative titles :

[en] Syncope in the emergencry room: Differential diagnosis and risk stratification

Publication date :

2018

Journal title :

Revue Médicale de Liège

ISSN :

0370-629X

eISSN :

2566-1566

Publisher :

Université de Liège. Revue Médicale de Liège, Liège, Belgium

Volume :

Issue :

5-6

Pages :

237-242

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Available on ORBi :

since 21 December 2018

Statistics

Number of views

341 (9 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

1000 (9 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, et al.— Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J, 2009, 30, 2631-2671.
Strickberger SA, Benson DW, Biaggioni I, et al.—AHA/ACCF scientific statement on the evaluation of syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47, 473-484.
Baron-Esquivias, Moreno SG, Martinez A, et al.—Cost of diagnosis and treatment of syncope in patients admitted to a cardiology unit. Europace, 2006, 8, 122-127.
Mathieu F, Melon P, Waleffe A, Pierard L.— La syncope. Rev Med Liege, 2004, 59, 311-314.
Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson, et al.— Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347, 878-885.
Ruwald MH, Hansen ML, Lamberts M, et al.— The relation between age, sex, comorbidity, and phar-macothérapy and the risk of syncope: a Danish nationwide study. Europace, 2012, 14, 1506-1514.
Ganzeboom KS, Mairuhu G, Reitsma JB, et al.—Lifetime cumulative incidence of syncope in the general population: a study of 549 Dutch subjects aged 36-60 years. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2006, 17, 1172-1176.
Freed LA, Eagle KA, Mahjoub ZA, et al.— Gender differences in presentation, management, and cardiac event-free survival in patients with syncopes. Am J Cardiol, 1997, 80, 1183-1187.
Summer GL, Rose S, Koshman ML, et al.— Prevention of Syncope Trial Investigators. – Recent history of vasovagal syncope in a young, referral-based population is a stronger predictor of recurrent syncope than lifetime syncope burden. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2010, 21, 1375-1380.
Hansen I, Melon P, Creemers E, Moonen G.— La vignette diagnostique de l’étudiant. Diagnostic différentiel structuré d’une perte brève de conscience. Rev Med Liege, 2012, 67, 157-162.
Scheen AJ, Philips JC, Krzesinski JM.— Diagnostic différentiel d’un malaise: hypoglycémie, hypotension ou spasmophilie? Rev Med Liege, 2011, 66, 48-54.
Numeroso F, Mossini G, Lippi G, et al.— Role of emergency department observation units in the management of patients with unexplained syncope: a critical creview and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Emerg Med, 2017, 4, 201-207.
Ungar A, Del Rosso A, Giada F, et al.— Evaluation of Guidelines of Syncope Study 2 Group. – Early and late outcome of treatet patients referred for syncope to emergency department: the EGSYS 2 follow-up study. Eur Heart J, 2010, 31, 2021-2026.
Solbiati M, Bozzano V, Barbic F, et al.— Outcomes in syncope research: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Intern Emerg Med, 2018, 18. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1788.
Kulbertus H, Melon P.— Comment j’explore … Une syncope. Rev Med Liege, 1998, 53, 38-40.
Scheen AJ, Geronooz I, Marchand M.— Le Finapres, une technique performante pour évaluer l’hypotension orthostatique, la neuropathie autonome et la syncope vaso-vagale. Rev Med Liege, 2001, 56, 577-582.
Scheen AJ, Marchand M, Juchmes J.— L’image du mois. Syncope vaso-vagale en direct. Rev Med Liege, 1997, 52, 315.
Philips JC, Scheen AJ.— Squatting test: a posture to study and counteract cardiovascular abnormalities associated with autonomic dysfunction. Auton Neurosci, 2011, 162, 3-9.
Kulbertus H, Melon P.— Comment je traite … La syncope vaso-vagale. Rev Med Liege, 1999, 54, 510-513.
Tyberghein M, Philips JM, Krzesinski JM, Scheen AJ.— L’hypotension orthostatique (2ème partie). Epidémiologie, complications et traitements. Rev Med Liege, 2013, 68, 163-170.